Contract – Agent. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held that the restrictions on the second respondent in his contract with the appellant company were enforceable and there had, therefore, been a breach of contract on the part of the second respondent. The judge's finding that the first respondent had unlawfully procured a breach of the second respondent's contract with the appellant was upheld. Accordingly, judgment for the appellant would be entered but, since it could not quantify its loss, no more would be done.