*/
Patent – Petition for revocation. The hearing officer, Deputy Director acting for the Comptroller of Patents, held that two patents held by the claimant company (Farrow) were invalid for obviousness and lack of inventive step. Farrow appealed against the decision concerning one of the two patents. The Patents Court held that, on the evidence, the appeal would be dismissed.
Patent – Petition for revocation. The hearing officer, Deputy Director acting for the Comptroller of Patents, held that two patents held by the claimant company (Farrow) were invalid for obviousness and lack of inventive step. Farrow appealed against the decision concerning one of the two patents. The Patents Court held that, on the evidence, the appeal would be dismissed.
It’s been a particularly hectic period in both the political sphere and our working lives
Casey Randall explores the benefits of prenatal paternity testing and explains how the test is performed
Philip N Bristow explains how to unlock your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step
Kate West discusses how best to interpret a drug test report, and the common misconceptions about what can be learnt from a drug test
Ashley Hodgkinson looks at drug testing methods and some of the most common ways people try to cheat a drug test
Clerksroom Chambers has recruited Matthew Wildish from 3 Paper Buildings (3PB) to a newly created position of Director of Clerking. Matthew joined the team at Clerksroom on 1 June
How did the international DJ and BBC Radio 1Xtra presenter find his transition to the Criminal Bar? Mark Robinsons secrets of a successful career change and his perception-breaking projects
Barrister, historian, legal biographer it was pure serendipity that the whirlwind silk went into the law and found his niche as a bestselling author, finds David Rhodes
A reminder of whats at stake. By Stephen Akinsanya
Surely diversity of thought at the Bar is a good thing? Why are chambers shoehorning all applicants for pupillage into the same mould? Roxy Lackschewitz-Martin looks at the diagnostic gap and neurodiversity in pupillage applications
Should counsel be allowed to express a personal opinion about their cases in public, when they cannot do so in court? asks Patrick O'Connor QC
