Practice – Appeal. The judge had been wrong to separate out the interest claim prior to demand from the claim to the principal loan sum. If, as the Judge found, there was a good arguable case that the primary claim fell within at least one of the gateways in CPR PD6B for service out of the jurisdiction, the accessory claim for interest did so. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held however that there was no serious issue to be tried in relation to the claim for interest as an implied term of the loan agreement.