*/
“Plague over England” by Nicholas de Jongh plays at the Duchess Theatre until 16 May. Martin Bowley QC explains the background.
In the autumn of 1953 John Gielgud was at the height of his powers. He was widely treated as the greatest classical actor of his generation, triumphing as Lear and Hamlet as well as John Worthing in “The Importance of Being Ernest”. He had been knighted in the Coronation Honours List. And he was gay.
On 22 October he was convicted of “cottaging” (“persistently importuning for an immoral purpose”) in a public lavatory just off the Fulham Road. He was fined £10 and advised to consult his doctor. The early 1950s had seen a major increase in the number of convictions for “gross indecency” from less than 300 a year before the war to nearly 1,700 in 1952, over 2,000 in 1954 and more than 2,300 in 1955. All sexual activity between men of any age was illegal and offenders were often given immediate and lengthy sentences of imprisonment.
It was a time when “pretty police officers” acting as “agents provocateurs” enthusiastically engaged in witch hunts which were encouraged and supported by the established Church, the popular press, the then Home Secretary, and the judiciary up to and including the Lord Chief Justice. The list of those arrested included Alan Turing – who helped to break the Enigma code at Bletchley Park – and the author Rupert Croft-Cooke.
Against that background, and focusing on Gielgud’s experience, Nicholas de Jongh has provided a fascinating picture of a now long forgotten and almost unbelievably sexually oppressive society. He takes his title from the then Home Secretary’s public description of homosexuality. In telling his story he uses to great effect the waspish wit which has marked his nearly 20 years as theatre critic of the London Evening Standard. He is greatly helped by Tamara Harvey’s quietly efficient direction, by Alex Marker’s clever multi-scene settings, by performances from John Warmaby as the Home Secretary, Hugh Ross as the Lord Chief Justice and Celia Imrie as Dame Sybil Thorndike. Above all there is Michael Feast who captures brilliantly every nuance of Gielgud’s physical and vocal mannerisms, and who gives a moving picture of a deeply insecure man, almost fatally destroyed by the trauma of his conviction and the resulting prurient publicity. The play ends with a 1975 epilogue in which he is preparing to play the gay Spooner in Pinter’s No Man’s Land.
As a theatre critic it is perhaps not surprising that de Jongh uses Gielgud to make his case, though much more significant at the time were the convictions in 1954 of Edward Montagu, Peter Wildeblood and Michael Pitt Rivers. As they left court to begin their prison sentences the waiting crowd shouted words of encouragement and tried to pat them on the back, having earlier booed and jeered the prosecution witnesses.
The Wolfenden Committee, set up within weeks of those convictions, reported in 1957; a decade later the law began to change, culminating in the 2003 Sexual Offences Act which repealed the “crimes” under which Gielgud and Oscar Wilde were convicted. However Gielgud maintained a dignified silence about the matter. He died at 96 as a national treasure. But he always remained a very private man.
Martin Bowley QC
On 22 October he was convicted of “cottaging” (“persistently importuning for an immoral purpose”) in a public lavatory just off the Fulham Road. He was fined £10 and advised to consult his doctor. The early 1950s had seen a major increase in the number of convictions for “gross indecency” from less than 300 a year before the war to nearly 1,700 in 1952, over 2,000 in 1954 and more than 2,300 in 1955. All sexual activity between men of any age was illegal and offenders were often given immediate and lengthy sentences of imprisonment.
It was a time when “pretty police officers” acting as “agents provocateurs” enthusiastically engaged in witch hunts which were encouraged and supported by the established Church, the popular press, the then Home Secretary, and the judiciary up to and including the Lord Chief Justice. The list of those arrested included Alan Turing – who helped to break the Enigma code at Bletchley Park – and the author Rupert Croft-Cooke.
Against that background, and focusing on Gielgud’s experience, Nicholas de Jongh has provided a fascinating picture of a now long forgotten and almost unbelievably sexually oppressive society. He takes his title from the then Home Secretary’s public description of homosexuality. In telling his story he uses to great effect the waspish wit which has marked his nearly 20 years as theatre critic of the London Evening Standard. He is greatly helped by Tamara Harvey’s quietly efficient direction, by Alex Marker’s clever multi-scene settings, by performances from John Warmaby as the Home Secretary, Hugh Ross as the Lord Chief Justice and Celia Imrie as Dame Sybil Thorndike. Above all there is Michael Feast who captures brilliantly every nuance of Gielgud’s physical and vocal mannerisms, and who gives a moving picture of a deeply insecure man, almost fatally destroyed by the trauma of his conviction and the resulting prurient publicity. The play ends with a 1975 epilogue in which he is preparing to play the gay Spooner in Pinter’s No Man’s Land.
As a theatre critic it is perhaps not surprising that de Jongh uses Gielgud to make his case, though much more significant at the time were the convictions in 1954 of Edward Montagu, Peter Wildeblood and Michael Pitt Rivers. As they left court to begin their prison sentences the waiting crowd shouted words of encouragement and tried to pat them on the back, having earlier booed and jeered the prosecution witnesses.
The Wolfenden Committee, set up within weeks of those convictions, reported in 1957; a decade later the law began to change, culminating in the 2003 Sexual Offences Act which repealed the “crimes” under which Gielgud and Oscar Wilde were convicted. However Gielgud maintained a dignified silence about the matter. He died at 96 as a national treasure. But he always remained a very private man.
Martin Bowley QC
“Plague over England” by Nicholas de Jongh plays at the Duchess Theatre until 16 May. Martin Bowley QC explains the background.
In the autumn of 1953 John Gielgud was at the height of his powers. He was widely treated as the greatest classical actor of his generation, triumphing as Lear and Hamlet as well as John Worthing in “The Importance of Being Ernest”. He had been knighted in the Coronation Honours List. And he was gay.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will
