*/
Bobbie Cheema and Sarah Perry discuss the forthcoming Advocacy Training Council Report on Vulnerable Witness, Victim and Defendant Handling
The manner in which the vulnerable are treated in our court system is a mark of how civilised a society we are.
The Advocacy Training Council (“ATC”), which oversees advocacy training for the Bar of England and Wales, is shortly to publish its Report on Vulnerable Witness, Victim and Defendant Handling. It is the first major research project in England and Wales to focus specifically on how best to train barristers in handling the most vulnerable people in court, whether witness or defendant, and whether vulnerable by reason of youth, learning disabilities or a mental health diagnosis.
The Report is the culmination of more than 12 months’ work undertaken by the ATC’s Vulnerable Witnesses and Defendants Handling Group (“VWDHG”). This Group – chaired by Bobbie Cheema and comprising Charles Haddon-Cave QC, Judge Wendy Joseph, Sally O’Neill QC, Johannah Cutts QC, Philip Mott QC and Rachel O’Driscoll – was set up in June 2009, in response to a number of striking cases highlighting the need to ensure all advocates are equipped to respond effectively to the needs of vulnerable people in court.
The VWDHG heard evidence from a broad range of experts, including members of the judiciary, practitioners, child/adolescent psychiatrists, intermediaries and social workers, adult learning experts, officials from the Ministry of Justice and members of the police force. This VWDHG research has ensured that the Report, its findings and its recommendations have a sound evidence base, drawn from the collective experience and expertise of those most qualified in their field.
The Report analyses the evidence under a number of thematic headings, comprising the full range of key issues to be addressed, including (1) pre-trial preparation and ABE interviews; (2) the crucial role to be played by the judiciary; (3) the use of intermediaries, psychiatrists, and social workers; (4) communication and questioning methods; (5) “coping” strategies helpful to a vulnerable person; and (6) the design and delivery of effective training programmes.
Three major themes emerged as the evidence was examined:
The urgent need to address the significant problems faced by vulnerable people in the court system (including feelings of intimidation and isolation; some advocates’ poor understanding of their particular needs; and marked inconsistencies and weaknesses in advocates’ handling during questioning).
The considerable benefits that effective education and training would bring to barristers as they approach the task of advising, examining and cross-examining vulnerable people.
The handling and questioning of vulnerable witnesses, victims and defendants is a specialist skill, and should be acknowledged as such by practitioners, judges, training providers and regulators. Furthermore, there should not be a perceived conflict between treating vulnerable witnesses and defendants fairly and appropriately, and where necessary testing their evidence.
The Report – which will be made available through the ATC’s website – makes a series of practical and far-reaching recommendations to ensure barristers are properly equipped to handle vulnerable witnesses, victims and defendants.
Key to these recommendations (see “Meeting the needs of the vulnerable in court” on p 37) is the need to ensure that advocates are sensitive and responsive to the particular vulnerabilities of the witness/defendant; that they are equipped to rigorously examine the evidence, fulfilling their duty to both client and court; and that they are able to elicit “Best Evidence”.
In addition, the Report will include a “Toolkit” to assist barristers in the preparation of their lines of questioning, identifying common problems likely to be encountered when examining particular vulnerabilities, and recommending possible solutions. The Toolkit is intended to be of practical use, a living document that will adapt and develop as progress in this area is made. It will be freely available to all advocates, both online and in document form.
The Report also makes a series of suggestions for the consideration of bodies including the Judicial Studies Board and the police force, as they continue to develop their own training programmes in this area.
It is believed that the forthcoming Report will represent a significant step forward for the handling of the vulnerable in the court system and for ensuring access to justice for all.
Bobbie Cheema is the Chair of the Vulnerable Witnesses and Defendants Handling Group. Sarah Perry is the Secretary of the Advocacy Training Council.
MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE VULNERABLE IN COURT
The 45 recommendations made in the Report fall under six headings:
For further information on the Report – including details of its launch and publication – visit the ATC’s website at www.advocacytrainingcouncil.org
The Report is the culmination of more than 12 months’ work undertaken by the ATC’s Vulnerable Witnesses and Defendants Handling Group (“VWDHG”). This Group – chaired by Bobbie Cheema and comprising Charles Haddon-Cave QC, Judge Wendy Joseph, Sally O’Neill QC, Johannah Cutts QC, Philip Mott QC and Rachel O’Driscoll – was set up in June 2009, in response to a number of striking cases highlighting the need to ensure all advocates are equipped to respond effectively to the needs of vulnerable people in court.
The VWDHG heard evidence from a broad range of experts, including members of the judiciary, practitioners, child/adolescent psychiatrists, intermediaries and social workers, adult learning experts, officials from the Ministry of Justice and members of the police force. This VWDHG research has ensured that the Report, its findings and its recommendations have a sound evidence base, drawn from the collective experience and expertise of those most qualified in their field.
The Report analyses the evidence under a number of thematic headings, comprising the full range of key issues to be addressed, including (1) pre-trial preparation and ABE interviews; (2) the crucial role to be played by the judiciary; (3) the use of intermediaries, psychiatrists, and social workers; (4) communication and questioning methods; (5) “coping” strategies helpful to a vulnerable person; and (6) the design and delivery of effective training programmes.
Three major themes emerged as the evidence was examined:
The urgent need to address the significant problems faced by vulnerable people in the court system (including feelings of intimidation and isolation; some advocates’ poor understanding of their particular needs; and marked inconsistencies and weaknesses in advocates’ handling during questioning).
The considerable benefits that effective education and training would bring to barristers as they approach the task of advising, examining and cross-examining vulnerable people.
The handling and questioning of vulnerable witnesses, victims and defendants is a specialist skill, and should be acknowledged as such by practitioners, judges, training providers and regulators. Furthermore, there should not be a perceived conflict between treating vulnerable witnesses and defendants fairly and appropriately, and where necessary testing their evidence.
The Report – which will be made available through the ATC’s website – makes a series of practical and far-reaching recommendations to ensure barristers are properly equipped to handle vulnerable witnesses, victims and defendants.
Key to these recommendations (see “Meeting the needs of the vulnerable in court” on p 37) is the need to ensure that advocates are sensitive and responsive to the particular vulnerabilities of the witness/defendant; that they are equipped to rigorously examine the evidence, fulfilling their duty to both client and court; and that they are able to elicit “Best Evidence”.
In addition, the Report will include a “Toolkit” to assist barristers in the preparation of their lines of questioning, identifying common problems likely to be encountered when examining particular vulnerabilities, and recommending possible solutions. The Toolkit is intended to be of practical use, a living document that will adapt and develop as progress in this area is made. It will be freely available to all advocates, both online and in document form.
The Report also makes a series of suggestions for the consideration of bodies including the Judicial Studies Board and the police force, as they continue to develop their own training programmes in this area.
It is believed that the forthcoming Report will represent a significant step forward for the handling of the vulnerable in the court system and for ensuring access to justice for all.
Bobbie Cheema is the Chair of the Vulnerable Witnesses and Defendants Handling Group. Sarah Perry is the Secretary of the Advocacy Training Council.
MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE VULNERABLE IN COURT
The 45 recommendations made in the Report fall under six headings:
For further information on the Report – including details of its launch and publication – visit the ATC’s website at www.advocacytrainingcouncil.org
Bobbie Cheema and Sarah Perry discuss the forthcoming Advocacy Training Council Report on Vulnerable Witness, Victim and Defendant Handling
The manner in which the vulnerable are treated in our court system is a mark of how civilised a society we are.
The Advocacy Training Council (“ATC”), which oversees advocacy training for the Bar of England and Wales, is shortly to publish its Report on Vulnerable Witness, Victim and Defendant Handling. It is the first major research project in England and Wales to focus specifically on how best to train barristers in handling the most vulnerable people in court, whether witness or defendant, and whether vulnerable by reason of youth, learning disabilities or a mental health diagnosis.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
AlphaBiolabs has been awarded the contract to provide drug, alcohol, and DNA testing services for Hull City Council, following a rigorous competitive tender process
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
At least not that way, says Richard Paige
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
