*/
Rhys Taylor, a barrister at 30 Park Place, Cardiff, explains how BARCO has worked for him.
Sitting on my desk early last year was a print out from Carol Harris, with 13 attachments relating to something called BARCO, the new Bar Council escrow account.
Over the summer I was instructed by a Public Access client for a one day final Financial Remedy hearing. For one reason and another, the final hearing ended up as a day’s worth of negotiation, with every prospect of settlement. The case was adjourned for three months for a further final hearing. At the end of day the client said to me, “Can you please continue to represent me?”
The problem for us both was, at that moment, I had no idea how much work I was going to be asked to do. Was it merely the drafting of letters to try and fi nalise settlement, was there to be a round table meeting, did I need to draft an order? Neither of us had any idea precisely how much work was going to be required to either settle the matter, or to bridge us over to the adjourned final hearing.
The 13 attachments came to mind and I explained, briefly, about barristers not being able to hold client money and the nature of an escrow account. Back at my desk, with plenty of other things to do, I started to study the detail contained within the 13 attachments...
Then a light came on: was not Carol Harris of BARCO that helpful lady who used to administer the FLBA? Having picked up the phone to Carol, I established within about 5 minutes how the account worked. In short, the client funds would be securely deposited and could not be unilaterally withdrawn by the client. With the client’s and my respective signatures, and two certified identification documents, an escrow account was open and ready to receive client funds. It was really easy to set up.
I agreed a further retainer with the client; she could instruct me in various matters relating to her Financial Remedy claim, up to a limit of 10 further hours, whereupon she would have to enter into a new retainer with me or cease to instruct me. 10 hours’ worth of fees were deposited into the account. This was far easier than having to agree a new retainer every time she asked me to do a further piece of work.
The matter was eventually contested at the adjourned final hearing. Prior to this I drew down fees incurred to date. The escrow account was then topped up and a new retainer signed to cover the final hearing – once a BARCO account is open, all future fees in that matter must be paid via the account.
The BARCO service may also be of use to barrister mediators and arbitrators, wanting to secure funds. It may also assist members of the Bar being instructed via solicitor referral, where the parties wish to apply the ‘COMBAR basis B’ contractual terms (i.e. the solicitor will pay counsel if they receive funds from lay client, which the solicitor endeavours to do) and there are particular concerns about the lay client’s solvency or willingness to pay. In that event that barrister may wish to secure the fee, by way of an advance deposit into BARCO, falling short of having to ask for payment of fees up front. This may be of particular relevance to barristers undertaking family instructions.
The cost of 2% of gross fees is a tax deductible expense.
Rhys Taylor is a barrister at The 36 Group, specialising in financial remedies. He is a contributing editor to The Family Court Practice (The Red Book) and editor of the Financial Remedies Journal.
Over the summer I was instructed by a Public Access client for a one day final Financial Remedy hearing. For one reason and another, the final hearing ended up as a day’s worth of negotiation, with every prospect of settlement. The case was adjourned for three months for a further final hearing. At the end of day the client said to me, “Can you please continue to represent me?”
The problem for us both was, at that moment, I had no idea how much work I was going to be asked to do. Was it merely the drafting of letters to try and fi nalise settlement, was there to be a round table meeting, did I need to draft an order? Neither of us had any idea precisely how much work was going to be required to either settle the matter, or to bridge us over to the adjourned final hearing.
The 13 attachments came to mind and I explained, briefly, about barristers not being able to hold client money and the nature of an escrow account. Back at my desk, with plenty of other things to do, I started to study the detail contained within the 13 attachments...
Then a light came on: was not Carol Harris of BARCO that helpful lady who used to administer the FLBA? Having picked up the phone to Carol, I established within about 5 minutes how the account worked. In short, the client funds would be securely deposited and could not be unilaterally withdrawn by the client. With the client’s and my respective signatures, and two certified identification documents, an escrow account was open and ready to receive client funds. It was really easy to set up.
I agreed a further retainer with the client; she could instruct me in various matters relating to her Financial Remedy claim, up to a limit of 10 further hours, whereupon she would have to enter into a new retainer with me or cease to instruct me. 10 hours’ worth of fees were deposited into the account. This was far easier than having to agree a new retainer every time she asked me to do a further piece of work.
The matter was eventually contested at the adjourned final hearing. Prior to this I drew down fees incurred to date. The escrow account was then topped up and a new retainer signed to cover the final hearing – once a BARCO account is open, all future fees in that matter must be paid via the account.
The BARCO service may also be of use to barrister mediators and arbitrators, wanting to secure funds. It may also assist members of the Bar being instructed via solicitor referral, where the parties wish to apply the ‘COMBAR basis B’ contractual terms (i.e. the solicitor will pay counsel if they receive funds from lay client, which the solicitor endeavours to do) and there are particular concerns about the lay client’s solvency or willingness to pay. In that event that barrister may wish to secure the fee, by way of an advance deposit into BARCO, falling short of having to ask for payment of fees up front. This may be of particular relevance to barristers undertaking family instructions.
The cost of 2% of gross fees is a tax deductible expense.
Rhys Taylor, a barrister at 30 Park Place, Cardiff, explains how BARCO has worked for him.
Sitting on my desk early last year was a print out from Carol Harris, with 13 attachments relating to something called BARCO, the new Bar Council escrow account.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
