*/
Great stuff
Intended as a theatrical contribution to the Magna Carta celebrations, the Read Not Dead’s final production of its series was of The Troublesome Reign of King John of England by George Peele. David Wurtzel was there
“Read Not Dead” is part of Shakespeare’s Globe education projects. On a Sunday morning, actors are given the script of a long-forgotten late 16th century/early 17th century play which they perform at a reading the same afternoon. Recently and appropriately these have taken place in the Inns, home to so much Elizabethan and Jacobean drama at the time. The present series culminated on 1 March with George Peele’s The Troublesome Reign of King John of England. The Globe intended it to contribute to the 800th anniversary celebrations of “the signing by King John of Magna Carta”. For what it is worth, the Charter was not signed but sealed and is never mentioned in this four-hour play.
What the play did have was a good plot, plenty of action, and marvellous verse. There are a number of themes running through it: royal legitimacy, primogeniture, war vs. diplomacy, Papal effrontery, the defeat of rebellion and the rule of law. Catering to the sensibilities of contemporary audiences was clearly more important than portraying the priorities of early 13th century English politics. There are rebellious barons but without Magna Carta they are only seen revolting against their true king, and so must be defeated. A largely young cast spoke the verse beautifully, and simulated battle scenes by running around Inner Temple Hall shouting and waving banners in a rather thrilling way. They seemed completely at ease with a play they first saw only hours before. No one stood still for long. If it was not quite a “rehearsed reading” it was certainly a reading with plenty of action. As the king, Elliot Fitzpatrick, only a few years out of drama school, brought to John two qualities one hitherto had not associated with him – charm and litheness. There was a cast of 15 actors, most of whom take several parts, including barrister-turned-actor Iain Christie who lately appeared in Murder in the Cathedral in Temple Church. There were also good parts for the women who largely spent their time upbraiding the men. The costumes were simple – suits or leather jackets, an evening dress, splendid overcoats, a few cardboard crowns, a well-chosen hat.
The play begins with the king having to adjudicate the claim of a younger son to inherit his father’s title and estate. There is an elder son, Philip, but he allegedly was fathered by none other than Richard the Lionheart. After a moment of anguish Philip sensibly decides that the shame of his mother’s adultery matters less than being a king’s son, and he acknowledges Richard as his true father. Thereafter he becomes his Uncle John’s most loyal and powerful subject. Superbly warlike, he manages during battles in France to wreak revenge on Richard’s captor, the evil Duke of Austria. The French war is due to John having taken the throne from his own elder brother’s son, Prince Arthur. The dispute is patched up by giving Arthur’s French lands to Blanche of Castile and then marrying her to the Dauphin.
After this success, John orders the imprisonment and death of Prince Arthur (Patrick Walshe McBride). There is a great scene between him and his putative murderer. Will the killer “lose salvation for a king’s reward?” Arthur asks. Yes, “to keep the world in order”. There follows a debate as to whether a killing can be lawful unless someone has been convicted of a crime, or whether the king’s command is sufficient. Magna Carta may be absent, but the issues of due process are there. The murderer spares Arthur, but the prince dies by accident when trying to escape from the castle. John is caught between losing his sovereignty to the Pope and losing his kingdom to the rebellion which seeks to put the Dauphin on the English throne. He begins defiantly (“I will reign as supreme head, spiritual and temporal”) and resists the Pope but only for as long as it takes to ransack the abbeys.
In the end John with Philip’s help defeats his temporal enemies. But there is no pleasing the Church and he is poisoned by friars at Swinstead Abbey where he has taken refuge (“this is the fruit of Popery, when true kings are poisoned”). It ends with the ascension of Henry III as the foreign invaders slink away. It was great stuff, performed with gusto.
Contributor David Wurtzel
Counsel Editorial Board Member
“Read Not Dead” is part of Shakespeare’s Globe education projects. On a Sunday morning, actors are given the script of a long-forgotten late 16th century/early 17th century play which they perform at a reading the same afternoon. Recently and appropriately these have taken place in the Inns, home to so much Elizabethan and Jacobean drama at the time. The present series culminated on 1 March with George Peele’s The Troublesome Reign of King John of England. The Globe intended it to contribute to the 800th anniversary celebrations of “the signing by King John of Magna Carta”. For what it is worth, the Charter was not signed but sealed and is never mentioned in this four-hour play.
What the play did have was a good plot, plenty of action, and marvellous verse. There are a number of themes running through it: royal legitimacy, primogeniture, war vs. diplomacy, Papal effrontery, the defeat of rebellion and the rule of law. Catering to the sensibilities of contemporary audiences was clearly more important than portraying the priorities of early 13th century English politics. There are rebellious barons but without Magna Carta they are only seen revolting against their true king, and so must be defeated. A largely young cast spoke the verse beautifully, and simulated battle scenes by running around Inner Temple Hall shouting and waving banners in a rather thrilling way. They seemed completely at ease with a play they first saw only hours before. No one stood still for long. If it was not quite a “rehearsed reading” it was certainly a reading with plenty of action. As the king, Elliot Fitzpatrick, only a few years out of drama school, brought to John two qualities one hitherto had not associated with him – charm and litheness. There was a cast of 15 actors, most of whom take several parts, including barrister-turned-actor Iain Christie who lately appeared in Murder in the Cathedral in Temple Church. There were also good parts for the women who largely spent their time upbraiding the men. The costumes were simple – suits or leather jackets, an evening dress, splendid overcoats, a few cardboard crowns, a well-chosen hat.
The play begins with the king having to adjudicate the claim of a younger son to inherit his father’s title and estate. There is an elder son, Philip, but he allegedly was fathered by none other than Richard the Lionheart. After a moment of anguish Philip sensibly decides that the shame of his mother’s adultery matters less than being a king’s son, and he acknowledges Richard as his true father. Thereafter he becomes his Uncle John’s most loyal and powerful subject. Superbly warlike, he manages during battles in France to wreak revenge on Richard’s captor, the evil Duke of Austria. The French war is due to John having taken the throne from his own elder brother’s son, Prince Arthur. The dispute is patched up by giving Arthur’s French lands to Blanche of Castile and then marrying her to the Dauphin.
After this success, John orders the imprisonment and death of Prince Arthur (Patrick Walshe McBride). There is a great scene between him and his putative murderer. Will the killer “lose salvation for a king’s reward?” Arthur asks. Yes, “to keep the world in order”. There follows a debate as to whether a killing can be lawful unless someone has been convicted of a crime, or whether the king’s command is sufficient. Magna Carta may be absent, but the issues of due process are there. The murderer spares Arthur, but the prince dies by accident when trying to escape from the castle. John is caught between losing his sovereignty to the Pope and losing his kingdom to the rebellion which seeks to put the Dauphin on the English throne. He begins defiantly (“I will reign as supreme head, spiritual and temporal”) and resists the Pope but only for as long as it takes to ransack the abbeys.
In the end John with Philip’s help defeats his temporal enemies. But there is no pleasing the Church and he is poisoned by friars at Swinstead Abbey where he has taken refuge (“this is the fruit of Popery, when true kings are poisoned”). It ends with the ascension of Henry III as the foreign invaders slink away. It was great stuff, performed with gusto.
Contributor David Wurtzel
Counsel Editorial Board Member
Great stuff
Intended as a theatrical contribution to the Magna Carta celebrations, the Read Not Dead’s final production of its series was of The Troublesome Reign of King John of England by George Peele. David Wurtzel was there
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
If the Bar cannot define and prohibit bullying behaviour, what chance do we have of persuading the Judiciary to do so? Darren Howe QC and Professor Jo Delahunty QC's call to action on codification plus suggested strategies for dealing with bullying from the Bar and Bench
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright