*/
At a packed South Eastern Circuit “road show” on 12 January Baroness Deech, Chair of the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”), described the changes made by the BSB last November to the way in which barristers can supply legal services as “the most important changes in this generation of the Bar”.
She emphasised that she had no wish to preside over fusion and that the decisions were not driven by “the need of the Bar to earn a living”; but rather to permit structures consistent with the principles in the Legal Services Act 2007.
The meeting was only one of several planned in the winter to test the views of the Bar on the way forward while Legal Services Board approval is pending on the proposed amendments to the Code.
Nick Green QC, Chairman of the Bar, said that he had seen a number of chambers’ business plans which are awaiting the green light and which show that no single model will work for everyone. Forming a legal disciplinary partnership is no longer unthinkable.
With the question and answer session dominated by criminal practitioners, the need for the Bar to earn its living was nevertheless uppermost in most people’s minds. Nick Green QC pointed out that the new rules will apply to everyone but one person pointed out that it is the publicly funded Bar, under pressure from HCA’s and Crown advocates, who are more likely to need the permissive authority to compete with solicitors, for example, by bidding to supply legal services through a “procure-co”. Views ranged widely, from those who were uncomfortable about any change to those who favour the end of the “referral profession” by revising the direct access to the client and not to have to rely upon solicitors to do what they have always had a monopoly of doing.
The road shows are likely to be attended by some 700 to 800 barristers in all but the Circuits are encouraged to set up forums to exchange information. Everyone was urged to ask questions and to keep an open mind.
Nick Green QC, Chairman of the Bar, said that he had seen a number of chambers’ business plans which are awaiting the green light and which show that no single model will work for everyone. Forming a legal disciplinary partnership is no longer unthinkable.
With the question and answer session dominated by criminal practitioners, the need for the Bar to earn its living was nevertheless uppermost in most people’s minds. Nick Green QC pointed out that the new rules will apply to everyone but one person pointed out that it is the publicly funded Bar, under pressure from HCA’s and Crown advocates, who are more likely to need the permissive authority to compete with solicitors, for example, by bidding to supply legal services through a “procure-co”. Views ranged widely, from those who were uncomfortable about any change to those who favour the end of the “referral profession” by revising the direct access to the client and not to have to rely upon solicitors to do what they have always had a monopoly of doing.
The road shows are likely to be attended by some 700 to 800 barristers in all but the Circuits are encouraged to set up forums to exchange information. Everyone was urged to ask questions and to keep an open mind.
At a packed South Eastern Circuit “road show” on 12 January Baroness Deech, Chair of the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”), described the changes made by the BSB last November to the way in which barristers can supply legal services as “the most important changes in this generation of the Bar”.
She emphasised that she had no wish to preside over fusion and that the decisions were not driven by “the need of the Bar to earn a living”; but rather to permit structures consistent with the principles in the Legal Services Act 2007.
The meeting was only one of several planned in the winter to test the views of the Bar on the way forward while Legal Services Board approval is pending on the proposed amendments to the Code.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt