*/
Beer: The Singular Case of Donoghue v Stevenson
Matthew Chapman
Wildy, Simmonds and Hill; Hardback (December 2009); £14.99 ISBN: 0854900497
“You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who, then, in law is my neighbour? The answer seems to be – persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called into question” per Lord Atkin.
Donoghue v Stevenson is one of the primary examples of judicial law-making. It has affected countless interactions throughout the world for decades since it was decided.
In this thoroughly researched homage to the “snail case” Matthew Chapman takes the reader to Paisley in Scotland, where on a Sunday in August 1928, a 30-year-old shop assistant, May Donoghue, sat down in the Wellmeadow Café to enjoy a bottle of ginger beer with a friend.
Matthew Chapman appears to have carefully researched every aspect of the story to provide the reader with all the “flesh” that is omitted from the bones of the law reports. Each of the characters is brought to life, including the noble Law Lords whose duty it was in December 1932 to decide to whom each of us owes a duty of care.
Lord Atkin’s biblical answer to that question has resonated with lawyers for decades since it was first delivered. Together with Lord Macmillan’s pronouncement that the “categories of negligence are never closed”, Lord Atkin’s ruling was initially met with unease from those who feared the floodgates opening. Matthew Chapman analyses the timid response to Lord Atkin’s ruling in the early case law that followed Donoghue v Stevenson. However, slowly but surely the full effect of the landmark judgment began to reverberate throughout the commonwealth jurisdictions of the world.
For the full story, look no further than this book.
Trevor Archer, barrister, 18 Red Lion Square
Donoghue v Stevenson is one of the primary examples of judicial law-making. It has affected countless interactions throughout the world for decades since it was decided.
In this thoroughly researched homage to the “snail case” Matthew Chapman takes the reader to Paisley in Scotland, where on a Sunday in August 1928, a 30-year-old shop assistant, May Donoghue, sat down in the Wellmeadow Café to enjoy a bottle of ginger beer with a friend.
Matthew Chapman appears to have carefully researched every aspect of the story to provide the reader with all the “flesh” that is omitted from the bones of the law reports. Each of the characters is brought to life, including the noble Law Lords whose duty it was in December 1932 to decide to whom each of us owes a duty of care.
Lord Atkin’s biblical answer to that question has resonated with lawyers for decades since it was first delivered. Together with Lord Macmillan’s pronouncement that the “categories of negligence are never closed”, Lord Atkin’s ruling was initially met with unease from those who feared the floodgates opening. Matthew Chapman analyses the timid response to Lord Atkin’s ruling in the early case law that followed Donoghue v Stevenson. However, slowly but surely the full effect of the landmark judgment began to reverberate throughout the commonwealth jurisdictions of the world.
For the full story, look no further than this book.
Trevor Archer, barrister, 18 Red Lion Square
Beer: The Singular Case of Donoghue v Stevenson
Matthew Chapman
Wildy, Simmonds and Hill; Hardback (December 2009); £14.99 ISBN: 0854900497
“You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who, then, in law is my neighbour? The answer seems to be – persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called into question” per Lord Atkin.
The Bar Council is ready to support a turn to the efficiencies that will make a difference
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
Ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC continues his series explaining the impact on barristers. In part 2, a worked example shows the specific practicalities of adapting to the new system
Resolution of the criminal justice crisis does not lie in reheating old ideas that have been roundly rejected before, say Ed Vickers KC, Faras Baloch and Katie Bacon
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar