*/
Barristers should not have to ‘tough it out’ against judicial bullying, the Bar Council and Senior Presiding Judge, Lady Justice Macur, have pledged in new guidance for the profession.
‘If you make a genuine and well-founded complaint, and do so in a responsible way, then you will have our full backing, as leaders, in doing so.’
Recognising that judges are also working under significant pressures and that all incidents must be judged in context, the guidance says that bullying behaviour can include personal abuse, sarcasm, contemptuousness, unreasonable demands, relentless criticism, intemperate language, demeaning behaviour or comments designed to embarrass, humiliate or question counsel’s competence or professionalism.
‘However small the number of occasions when judicial bullying occurs, it is always unacceptable,’ the Bar Council said. ‘We need to be able to discuss this without fear of being seen as weak or incompetent. Bullying can and does happen to the strongest and best of us. We must continue to talk about it, and to be proactive in raising concerns.’
Barristers are encouraged, if possible, to take immediate action: ‘A timely response, if it can be given, may be more effective both in addressing the incident itself and in helping the judge to understand the impact.’
New ways of reporting are being developed to help overcome the understandable reluctance to register complaints, given the potential impact on client’s case and a barrister’s career. The confidential helpline is: 020 7611 1426.
The guidance is timely. The Criminal Bar Association has been cataloguing the demoralising experiences of junior – particularly women – advocates in court which, amongst the broader issues of fees and working conditions, are driving many away from the profession. ‘I don’t think I have ever been shouted at like I was by that judge… completely unacceptable... he acted like a toddler. I have decided to leave the Bar for the time being, a big part of my decision to go is the life I am leading as a very junior criminal barrister,’ said one CBA member.
The issue of judicial bullying was courageously outed in 2017 by @MAM12CP, @Familoo and @mcgrathauthor. Jo Delahunty QC raised the profile in her Gresham lecture ‘A Day in the Life of a Judge’ and an article for Counsel (March 2018).
Barristers should not have to ‘tough it out’ against judicial bullying, the Bar Council and Senior Presiding Judge, Lady Justice Macur, have pledged in new guidance for the profession.
‘If you make a genuine and well-founded complaint, and do so in a responsible way, then you will have our full backing, as leaders, in doing so.’
Recognising that judges are also working under significant pressures and that all incidents must be judged in context, the guidance says that bullying behaviour can include personal abuse, sarcasm, contemptuousness, unreasonable demands, relentless criticism, intemperate language, demeaning behaviour or comments designed to embarrass, humiliate or question counsel’s competence or professionalism.
‘However small the number of occasions when judicial bullying occurs, it is always unacceptable,’ the Bar Council said. ‘We need to be able to discuss this without fear of being seen as weak or incompetent. Bullying can and does happen to the strongest and best of us. We must continue to talk about it, and to be proactive in raising concerns.’
Barristers are encouraged, if possible, to take immediate action: ‘A timely response, if it can be given, may be more effective both in addressing the incident itself and in helping the judge to understand the impact.’
New ways of reporting are being developed to help overcome the understandable reluctance to register complaints, given the potential impact on client’s case and a barrister’s career. The confidential helpline is: 020 7611 1426.
The guidance is timely. The Criminal Bar Association has been cataloguing the demoralising experiences of junior – particularly women – advocates in court which, amongst the broader issues of fees and working conditions, are driving many away from the profession. ‘I don’t think I have ever been shouted at like I was by that judge… completely unacceptable... he acted like a toddler. I have decided to leave the Bar for the time being, a big part of my decision to go is the life I am leading as a very junior criminal barrister,’ said one CBA member.
The issue of judicial bullying was courageously outed in 2017 by @MAM12CP, @Familoo and @mcgrathauthor. Jo Delahunty QC raised the profile in her Gresham lecture ‘A Day in the Life of a Judge’ and an article for Counsel (March 2018).
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
