*/
Barristers should not have to ‘tough it out’ against judicial bullying, the Bar Council and Senior Presiding Judge, Lady Justice Macur, have pledged in new guidance for the profession.
‘If you make a genuine and well-founded complaint, and do so in a responsible way, then you will have our full backing, as leaders, in doing so.’
Recognising that judges are also working under significant pressures and that all incidents must be judged in context, the guidance says that bullying behaviour can include personal abuse, sarcasm, contemptuousness, unreasonable demands, relentless criticism, intemperate language, demeaning behaviour or comments designed to embarrass, humiliate or question counsel’s competence or professionalism.
‘However small the number of occasions when judicial bullying occurs, it is always unacceptable,’ the Bar Council said. ‘We need to be able to discuss this without fear of being seen as weak or incompetent. Bullying can and does happen to the strongest and best of us. We must continue to talk about it, and to be proactive in raising concerns.’
Barristers are encouraged, if possible, to take immediate action: ‘A timely response, if it can be given, may be more effective both in addressing the incident itself and in helping the judge to understand the impact.’
New ways of reporting are being developed to help overcome the understandable reluctance to register complaints, given the potential impact on client’s case and a barrister’s career. The confidential helpline is: 020 7611 1426.
The guidance is timely. The Criminal Bar Association has been cataloguing the demoralising experiences of junior – particularly women – advocates in court which, amongst the broader issues of fees and working conditions, are driving many away from the profession. ‘I don’t think I have ever been shouted at like I was by that judge… completely unacceptable... he acted like a toddler. I have decided to leave the Bar for the time being, a big part of my decision to go is the life I am leading as a very junior criminal barrister,’ said one CBA member.
The issue of judicial bullying was courageously outed in 2017 by @MAM12CP, @Familoo and @mcgrathauthor. Jo Delahunty QC raised the profile in her Gresham lecture ‘A Day in the Life of a Judge’ and an article for Counsel (March 2018).
Barristers should not have to ‘tough it out’ against judicial bullying, the Bar Council and Senior Presiding Judge, Lady Justice Macur, have pledged in new guidance for the profession.
‘If you make a genuine and well-founded complaint, and do so in a responsible way, then you will have our full backing, as leaders, in doing so.’
Recognising that judges are also working under significant pressures and that all incidents must be judged in context, the guidance says that bullying behaviour can include personal abuse, sarcasm, contemptuousness, unreasonable demands, relentless criticism, intemperate language, demeaning behaviour or comments designed to embarrass, humiliate or question counsel’s competence or professionalism.
‘However small the number of occasions when judicial bullying occurs, it is always unacceptable,’ the Bar Council said. ‘We need to be able to discuss this without fear of being seen as weak or incompetent. Bullying can and does happen to the strongest and best of us. We must continue to talk about it, and to be proactive in raising concerns.’
Barristers are encouraged, if possible, to take immediate action: ‘A timely response, if it can be given, may be more effective both in addressing the incident itself and in helping the judge to understand the impact.’
New ways of reporting are being developed to help overcome the understandable reluctance to register complaints, given the potential impact on client’s case and a barrister’s career. The confidential helpline is: 020 7611 1426.
The guidance is timely. The Criminal Bar Association has been cataloguing the demoralising experiences of junior – particularly women – advocates in court which, amongst the broader issues of fees and working conditions, are driving many away from the profession. ‘I don’t think I have ever been shouted at like I was by that judge… completely unacceptable... he acted like a toddler. I have decided to leave the Bar for the time being, a big part of my decision to go is the life I am leading as a very junior criminal barrister,’ said one CBA member.
The issue of judicial bullying was courageously outed in 2017 by @MAM12CP, @Familoo and @mcgrathauthor. Jo Delahunty QC raised the profile in her Gresham lecture ‘A Day in the Life of a Judge’ and an article for Counsel (March 2018).
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Following the launch of the Life at the Young Bar report and a nationwide listening exercise, Michael Polak and Michael Harwood outline the Young Barristers Committees raft of initiatives designed to address your issues of concern
