*/
Starring Michael B Jordan as American civil rights attorney Bryan Stevenson, and Jamie Foxx as Walter McMillian, a man who was wrongly convicted and sentenced to death, Just Mercy is a film adaptation of one Stevenson’s most important real-life cases, and takes its title from his 2014 book of the same name. As a fact-based retelling of a grave miscarriage of justice, the film is extremely interesting; indeed, Stevenson’s book (and audiobook) has already proved to be a very popular source of inspiration among many young and aspiring lawyers.
The film recounts Stevenson’s life story, from a graduate of Harvard Law School, to founder of the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI): a not-for-profit that provides legal representation to prisoners who may have been wrongly convicted of crimes, poor prisoners without effective representation, and others who may have been denied a fair trial.
As a young lawyer, Stevenson resolves to overturn the murder conviction of McMillian, an African-American man who was accused of killing a young white woman who worked as a clerk in a dry cleaning store in Monroeville, Alabama in 1986, and who spent six years on death row.
The scene where Stevenson pays a visit to McMillian’s family home in the Deep South and establishes there was a complete alibi, is excellent, and by his sheer tenacity, Stevenson was able to prove the conviction was obtained by Police coercion, and wholly unreliable evidence.
The film also tracks other clients mentioned in Stevenson’s book, including the troubling state execution of Herbert Richardson, whose mental health problems resulting from service in the Vietnam War were ignored at his capital trial, giving much pause for thought on the justness of the death penalty as a form of punishment.
In my view, the film deserves a great deal of admiration, for its attempt to bring attention to the systematic flaws, and blatant racism, inherent in the US criminal justice system. Moreover, the film is also remarkable for the manner in which intermingles footage from earlier documentaries, for the astonishing likeness created of the actual people it concerns, and for its depiction of 1980s criminal litigation. There is also an insight into the motivations behind Stevenson’s work and his distinguished legal career: as a victim of racism himself, and as a person of Christian faith, with great force he reminds us that: ‘We all need mercy, we all need justice, and perhaps, we all need some measure of unmerited grace.’
The closing credits make clear that the film is based on factual events. The work of the EJI continues, as the high levels of incarceration in the US mean that there is much advocacy to be done for those facing racial bias and discrimination in their criminal justice system.
Our justice system too, disproportionately charges and tries those that are from Black, Asian and Ethnic Minority communities (The Lammy Review, 2017). Whilst the subject matter is heavy and the film can evoke many emotions (and the US style of advocacy and courtroom closing speeches would be unrealistic to perform in England and Wales) it could nevertheless do much to motivate lawyers in this jurisdiction, in defending the rights of the poor and disadvantaged.
Andrew Otchie is a barrister at 12 Old Square Chambers (the Chambers of Mrs Charlotte Boaitey) where he enjoys a broad practice. He frequently appears on behalf of appellants in immigration cases and undertakes pro-bono work under the auspices of ELAAS. Andrew was awarded an MPhil degree from the University of Hull and has passed the New York State Bar Exam.
Starring Michael B Jordan as American civil rights attorney Bryan Stevenson, and Jamie Foxx as Walter McMillian, a man who was wrongly convicted and sentenced to death, Just Mercy is a film adaptation of one Stevenson’s most important real-life cases, and takes its title from his 2014 book of the same name. As a fact-based retelling of a grave miscarriage of justice, the film is extremely interesting; indeed, Stevenson’s book (and audiobook) has already proved to be a very popular source of inspiration among many young and aspiring lawyers.
The film recounts Stevenson’s life story, from a graduate of Harvard Law School, to founder of the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI): a not-for-profit that provides legal representation to prisoners who may have been wrongly convicted of crimes, poor prisoners without effective representation, and others who may have been denied a fair trial.
As a young lawyer, Stevenson resolves to overturn the murder conviction of McMillian, an African-American man who was accused of killing a young white woman who worked as a clerk in a dry cleaning store in Monroeville, Alabama in 1986, and who spent six years on death row.
The scene where Stevenson pays a visit to McMillian’s family home in the Deep South and establishes there was a complete alibi, is excellent, and by his sheer tenacity, Stevenson was able to prove the conviction was obtained by Police coercion, and wholly unreliable evidence.
The film also tracks other clients mentioned in Stevenson’s book, including the troubling state execution of Herbert Richardson, whose mental health problems resulting from service in the Vietnam War were ignored at his capital trial, giving much pause for thought on the justness of the death penalty as a form of punishment.
In my view, the film deserves a great deal of admiration, for its attempt to bring attention to the systematic flaws, and blatant racism, inherent in the US criminal justice system. Moreover, the film is also remarkable for the manner in which intermingles footage from earlier documentaries, for the astonishing likeness created of the actual people it concerns, and for its depiction of 1980s criminal litigation. There is also an insight into the motivations behind Stevenson’s work and his distinguished legal career: as a victim of racism himself, and as a person of Christian faith, with great force he reminds us that: ‘We all need mercy, we all need justice, and perhaps, we all need some measure of unmerited grace.’
The closing credits make clear that the film is based on factual events. The work of the EJI continues, as the high levels of incarceration in the US mean that there is much advocacy to be done for those facing racial bias and discrimination in their criminal justice system.
Our justice system too, disproportionately charges and tries those that are from Black, Asian and Ethnic Minority communities (The Lammy Review, 2017). Whilst the subject matter is heavy and the film can evoke many emotions (and the US style of advocacy and courtroom closing speeches would be unrealistic to perform in England and Wales) it could nevertheless do much to motivate lawyers in this jurisdiction, in defending the rights of the poor and disadvantaged.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
