*/
The Bar’s regulator published proposals to provide more ‘innovative and flexible’ pupillages and remove barriers to the profession.
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has suggested scrapping the compulsory 12-months of pupillage, leaving the training length up to individual chambers. It also proposed raising the £12,000 minimum award, that must be paid to pupils over the course of their year-long pupillage. The current sum, it said, is below the national living wage, which prevents individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds entering the profession.
The Consultation on Future Bar Training would see a lesser role for the four Inns of Court, removing the need for students to sign up with one before they begin the Bar Professional Training Course, and passing the task of student registration on to the regulator (see: bit.ly/2wTjUSI).
The paper also moots removing the requirement to complete 12 ‘qualifying sessions’, which can include guest lecture events, advocacy workshops, dining sessions and debate nights.
The BSB paper said it ‘understandsthe historic and supportive role played by the Inns’ and ‘has no intention of changing what works well’, but said it wants to ‘deregulate’ these areas.
Its Director of Strategy and Policy, Ewen Macleod, said the BSB wants to ensure the rules governing pupillage and qualification remain ‘fit for purpose over the long-term’, maintaining high-standards of entry, ensuring that a career at the bar is accessible to everyone with the potential. ‘There are a number of possible ways to achieve all of this, so we are keen to hear what people think about the issues,’ he said.
The consultation closes in January 2018 with any new rules coming into effect in 2019.
The Bar’s regulator published proposals to provide more ‘innovative and flexible’ pupillages and remove barriers to the profession.
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has suggested scrapping the compulsory 12-months of pupillage, leaving the training length up to individual chambers. It also proposed raising the £12,000 minimum award, that must be paid to pupils over the course of their year-long pupillage. The current sum, it said, is below the national living wage, which prevents individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds entering the profession.
The Consultation on Future Bar Training would see a lesser role for the four Inns of Court, removing the need for students to sign up with one before they begin the Bar Professional Training Course, and passing the task of student registration on to the regulator (see: bit.ly/2wTjUSI).
The paper also moots removing the requirement to complete 12 ‘qualifying sessions’, which can include guest lecture events, advocacy workshops, dining sessions and debate nights.
The BSB paper said it ‘understandsthe historic and supportive role played by the Inns’ and ‘has no intention of changing what works well’, but said it wants to ‘deregulate’ these areas.
Its Director of Strategy and Policy, Ewen Macleod, said the BSB wants to ensure the rules governing pupillage and qualification remain ‘fit for purpose over the long-term’, maintaining high-standards of entry, ensuring that a career at the bar is accessible to everyone with the potential. ‘There are a number of possible ways to achieve all of this, so we are keen to hear what people think about the issues,’ he said.
The consultation closes in January 2018 with any new rules coming into effect in 2019.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
Why were some Caribbean nations given such dramatically different constitutional frameworks when they gained independence from the UK? Dr Leonardo Raznovich examines the controversial savings clause
