*/
Only by going through the pupillage application process will students understand their chances of success. Joanne Wicks QC explains why and how applicants should be encouraged to apply for pupillage before undertaking the Bar Professional Training Course
Most barristers I speak to think that the ratio of Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) places to pupillages is a scandal.
Every year thousands of students, many already heavily burdened by student debt, throw large sums of money at BPTC providers in pursuit of a hopeless dream. We risk ending up with a Bar made up only of those rich enough to gamble thousands of pounds.
In the long term, only structural reform will address these issues, but this will take time to develop and implement. As a member of the Bar Council’s Social Mobility Committee, I was asked by the former Chairman of the Bar, Nicholas Lavender QC, to chair a working group looking at the timing of pupillage recruitment, within the confines of the existing system. The working group reported in March 2015, recommending a package of measures to encourage students to apply for pupillage before they commit to the BPTC. One of those recommendations is a change to the timetable for the Pupillage Gateway, which is the subject of a consultation this Autumn. However, this is not all.
The starting point is a firm belief that the best way for a student to obtain a realistic assessment of his or her prospects of ever obtaining pupillage is to go through the pupillage application process. Weaker applicants may come to appreciate that their best interests lie in another career; others learn how to improve their applications next time around. All this is best done before the candidate commits to undertaking the BPTC, allowing them time to take stock before embarking on a path which may not lead to their ultimate goal.
However, our research showed that large numbers of students do not have, or take, that opportunity.
The first reason for this is that many students are waiting until their BPTC year before making their first application for pupillage. The surveys conducted by the working group indicated that nearly half do not make their first pupillage application until they have already embarked on the course. This trend is confirmed by a recent survey which found that less than a quarter of applicants using the Pupillage Gateway in 2015 were applying before commencing the BPTC. The choice appears to be a deliberate one, since only a tiny minority are unaware that they could have applied a year earlier.
The second reason is the timing of the Pupillage Gateway. Under the current timetable, applicants do not get pupillage offers until August, but some BPTC providers require a substantial payment of fees (up to £8,500) in July. That means that even those candidates who do apply for pupillage before starting the BPTC may be obliged to fork out large sums of money before they know whether they have been successful.
Reasons to apply early
Waiting until your BPTC year to make your first pupillage application is not a good idea. First, you lose the opportunity to obtain a realistic assessment of the extent of the competition before you commit to, and pay for, the course. Secondly, you narrow the pupillage options available to you. That is because many pupillage providers, particularly those in financially secure areas of practice, recruit exclusively from those who are in their last year of academic study or who are working before undertaking the BPTC. Thirdly, because the Bar still generally recruits 18 months or so in advance, even if successful in the first round, you will usually have a year to fill after completing your BPTC and before commencing pupillage. By delaying your first pupillage application, therefore, you exacerbate the costs and risks associated with a career choice which is already costly and risky enough. This is bad news for all students, but it is particularly bad news for those from less privileged backgrounds who do not have the cushions against financial risk and delay available to their more privileged peers.
The working group therefore concluded that it is important, and in the interests of social mobility, to remove or diminish the elements of the current system which incentivise students to wait until their BPTC year before making their first pupillage application. We see these as being:
We have therefore recommended:
I recognise that it may seem counter-intuitive to recommend earlier pupil selection in the interests of social mobility, since it is well-known that those from less privileged backgrounds tend to develop their skills later. However, we need to recognise that the Bar already recruits very late in comparison with other professions, including solicitors. Taken in the round, I firmly believe that the certainty and financial security which can be offered by early pupil selection is more beneficial for those from less privileged backgrounds than the delay, risk and cost associated with waiting until later. I hope the profession will take the chance to right, in some small way, the wrongs of the current recruitment system.
The Bar Council will be consulting the profession this autumn on the impact of moving the Pupillage Gateway timetable and would like to hear your views. Please look out for further announcements on the consultation process or contact the Bar Council press office at press@barcouncil.org.uk for more information.
Contributor Joanne Wicks QC
Every year thousands of students, many already heavily burdened by student debt, throw large sums of money at BPTC providers in pursuit of a hopeless dream. We risk ending up with a Bar made up only of those rich enough to gamble thousands of pounds.
In the long term, only structural reform will address these issues, but this will take time to develop and implement. As a member of the Bar Council’s Social Mobility Committee, I was asked by the former Chairman of the Bar, Nicholas Lavender QC, to chair a working group looking at the timing of pupillage recruitment, within the confines of the existing system. The working group reported in March 2015, recommending a package of measures to encourage students to apply for pupillage before they commit to the BPTC. One of those recommendations is a change to the timetable for the Pupillage Gateway, which is the subject of a consultation this Autumn. However, this is not all.
The starting point is a firm belief that the best way for a student to obtain a realistic assessment of his or her prospects of ever obtaining pupillage is to go through the pupillage application process. Weaker applicants may come to appreciate that their best interests lie in another career; others learn how to improve their applications next time around. All this is best done before the candidate commits to undertaking the BPTC, allowing them time to take stock before embarking on a path which may not lead to their ultimate goal.
However, our research showed that large numbers of students do not have, or take, that opportunity.
The first reason for this is that many students are waiting until their BPTC year before making their first application for pupillage. The surveys conducted by the working group indicated that nearly half do not make their first pupillage application until they have already embarked on the course. This trend is confirmed by a recent survey which found that less than a quarter of applicants using the Pupillage Gateway in 2015 were applying before commencing the BPTC. The choice appears to be a deliberate one, since only a tiny minority are unaware that they could have applied a year earlier.
The second reason is the timing of the Pupillage Gateway. Under the current timetable, applicants do not get pupillage offers until August, but some BPTC providers require a substantial payment of fees (up to £8,500) in July. That means that even those candidates who do apply for pupillage before starting the BPTC may be obliged to fork out large sums of money before they know whether they have been successful.
Reasons to apply early
Waiting until your BPTC year to make your first pupillage application is not a good idea. First, you lose the opportunity to obtain a realistic assessment of the extent of the competition before you commit to, and pay for, the course. Secondly, you narrow the pupillage options available to you. That is because many pupillage providers, particularly those in financially secure areas of practice, recruit exclusively from those who are in their last year of academic study or who are working before undertaking the BPTC. Thirdly, because the Bar still generally recruits 18 months or so in advance, even if successful in the first round, you will usually have a year to fill after completing your BPTC and before commencing pupillage. By delaying your first pupillage application, therefore, you exacerbate the costs and risks associated with a career choice which is already costly and risky enough. This is bad news for all students, but it is particularly bad news for those from less privileged backgrounds who do not have the cushions against financial risk and delay available to their more privileged peers.
The working group therefore concluded that it is important, and in the interests of social mobility, to remove or diminish the elements of the current system which incentivise students to wait until their BPTC year before making their first pupillage application. We see these as being:
We have therefore recommended:
I recognise that it may seem counter-intuitive to recommend earlier pupil selection in the interests of social mobility, since it is well-known that those from less privileged backgrounds tend to develop their skills later. However, we need to recognise that the Bar already recruits very late in comparison with other professions, including solicitors. Taken in the round, I firmly believe that the certainty and financial security which can be offered by early pupil selection is more beneficial for those from less privileged backgrounds than the delay, risk and cost associated with waiting until later. I hope the profession will take the chance to right, in some small way, the wrongs of the current recruitment system.
The Bar Council will be consulting the profession this autumn on the impact of moving the Pupillage Gateway timetable and would like to hear your views. Please look out for further announcements on the consultation process or contact the Bar Council press office at press@barcouncil.org.uk for more information.
Contributor Joanne Wicks QC
Only by going through the pupillage application process will students understand their chances of success. Joanne Wicks QC explains why and how applicants should be encouraged to apply for pupillage before undertaking the Bar Professional Training Course
Most barristers I speak to think that the ratio of Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) places to pupillages is a scandal.
Our call for sufficient resources for the justice system and for the Bar to scrutinise the BSB’s latest consultation
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses alcohol testing for the Family Court
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth explains how to make sure you are investing suitably, and in your long-term interests
In conversation with Matthew Bland, Lincoln’s Inn Library
Millicent Wild of 5 Essex Chambers describes her pupillage experience
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth explores some key steps to take when starting out as a barrister in order to secure your financial future
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
Expectations, experiences and survival tips – some of the things I wished I had known (or applied) when I was starting pupillage. By Chelsea Brooke-Ward
If you are in/about to start pupillage, you will soon be facing the pupillage stage assessment in professional ethics. Jane Hutton and Patrick Ryan outline exam format and tactics
In a two-part opinion series, James Onalaja considers the International Criminal Court Prosecutor’s requests for arrest warrants in the controversial Israel-Palestine situation