*/
David Quinton explains how barristers can now use pension plans to help buy premises through the Professional Practices SIPP
Barristers, like any other self-employed professionals, need to consider carefully how to generate funds for retirement to ensure a comfortable lifestyle in older age. Recent developments have substantially improved the pension planning opportunities.
Barristers can now contribute up to 100% of earnings—up to a generous cap of £235,000 for the 2008/09 tax year—securing income tax relief at up to 40% on that contribution. They can continue to fund as aggressively as they wish within their annual allowances, providing their total retirement fund does not exceed the annual lifetime allowance (£1.65m for 2008/09).
Self-invested pension plans (SIPPs) offer flexibility, control over investments, and the ability to hire and fire advisers without penalty. But unlike private company directors, the self-employed have been denied the ability to use pension savings to assist in their business—until now.
The sweeping reforms to pension regulation enable a barrister to use pension funds to purchase commercial property. Three important advantages flow from this route: tax relief on contributions going in; arms’ length rent payable to the pension fund (deductible as an expense to the business); and tax free capital growth on the building and its income. An individual SIPP may offer this facility, but the capacity to purchase commercial property will be restricted by the size of the fund and the annual lifetime allowance of the individual concerned. However, a recent development from the new legislation, the Professional Practices SIPP (PP SIPP), will overcome this obstacle.
Barristers, and groups of like-minded individuals generally, can make their pension contributions into a pooled fund and combine their annual allowances to create far greater buying power than an individual SIPP investor. If, say, 10 barristers in chambers joined together in a PP SIPP, they have the collective potential to buy and retain a building in the PP SIPP worth up to £16.5m. Existing pension arrangements can be transferred into the pooled scheme if required, and the fund can gear up by borrowing up to 50% of the net asset value of the pooled fund. Thus, if the 10 barristers transfer existing pension funds of £2m into their PP SIPP when they set it up, they can, with gearing, potentially buy commercial property of up to £3m straight away.
Barristers joining chambers can be eligible to be part of the PP SIPP, and those who move away can leave the plan. However, all decisions need to be unanimous. With careful management, including policies about joining and leaving, the PP SIPP can be tailored to suit each chambers.
David Quinton is a senior consultant at Smith & Williamson. Email: David.quinton@smith.williamson.co.uk
Barristers can now contribute up to 100% of earnings—up to a generous cap of £235,000 for the 2008/09 tax year—securing income tax relief at up to 40% on that contribution. They can continue to fund as aggressively as they wish within their annual allowances, providing their total retirement fund does not exceed the annual lifetime allowance (£1.65m for 2008/09).
Self-invested pension plans (SIPPs) offer flexibility, control over investments, and the ability to hire and fire advisers without penalty. But unlike private company directors, the self-employed have been denied the ability to use pension savings to assist in their business—until now.
The sweeping reforms to pension regulation enable a barrister to use pension funds to purchase commercial property. Three important advantages flow from this route: tax relief on contributions going in; arms’ length rent payable to the pension fund (deductible as an expense to the business); and tax free capital growth on the building and its income. An individual SIPP may offer this facility, but the capacity to purchase commercial property will be restricted by the size of the fund and the annual lifetime allowance of the individual concerned. However, a recent development from the new legislation, the Professional Practices SIPP (PP SIPP), will overcome this obstacle.
Barristers, and groups of like-minded individuals generally, can make their pension contributions into a pooled fund and combine their annual allowances to create far greater buying power than an individual SIPP investor. If, say, 10 barristers in chambers joined together in a PP SIPP, they have the collective potential to buy and retain a building in the PP SIPP worth up to £16.5m. Existing pension arrangements can be transferred into the pooled scheme if required, and the fund can gear up by borrowing up to 50% of the net asset value of the pooled fund. Thus, if the 10 barristers transfer existing pension funds of £2m into their PP SIPP when they set it up, they can, with gearing, potentially buy commercial property of up to £3m straight away.
Barristers joining chambers can be eligible to be part of the PP SIPP, and those who move away can leave the plan. However, all decisions need to be unanimous. With careful management, including policies about joining and leaving, the PP SIPP can be tailored to suit each chambers.
David Quinton is a senior consultant at Smith & Williamson. Email: David.quinton@smith.williamson.co.uk
David Quinton explains how barristers can now use pension plans to help buy premises through the Professional Practices SIPP
Barristers, like any other self-employed professionals, need to consider carefully how to generate funds for retirement to ensure a comfortable lifestyle in older age. Recent developments have substantially improved the pension planning opportunities.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will
