*/
David Quinton explains how barristers can now use pension plans to help buy premises through the Professional Practices SIPP
Barristers, like any other self-employed professionals, need to consider carefully how to generate funds for retirement to ensure a comfortable lifestyle in older age. Recent developments have substantially improved the pension planning opportunities.
Barristers can now contribute up to 100% of earnings—up to a generous cap of £235,000 for the 2008/09 tax year—securing income tax relief at up to 40% on that contribution. They can continue to fund as aggressively as they wish within their annual allowances, providing their total retirement fund does not exceed the annual lifetime allowance (£1.65m for 2008/09).
Self-invested pension plans (SIPPs) offer flexibility, control over investments, and the ability to hire and fire advisers without penalty. But unlike private company directors, the self-employed have been denied the ability to use pension savings to assist in their business—until now.
The sweeping reforms to pension regulation enable a barrister to use pension funds to purchase commercial property. Three important advantages flow from this route: tax relief on contributions going in; arms’ length rent payable to the pension fund (deductible as an expense to the business); and tax free capital growth on the building and its income. An individual SIPP may offer this facility, but the capacity to purchase commercial property will be restricted by the size of the fund and the annual lifetime allowance of the individual concerned. However, a recent development from the new legislation, the Professional Practices SIPP (PP SIPP), will overcome this obstacle.
Barristers, and groups of like-minded individuals generally, can make their pension contributions into a pooled fund and combine their annual allowances to create far greater buying power than an individual SIPP investor. If, say, 10 barristers in chambers joined together in a PP SIPP, they have the collective potential to buy and retain a building in the PP SIPP worth up to £16.5m. Existing pension arrangements can be transferred into the pooled scheme if required, and the fund can gear up by borrowing up to 50% of the net asset value of the pooled fund. Thus, if the 10 barristers transfer existing pension funds of £2m into their PP SIPP when they set it up, they can, with gearing, potentially buy commercial property of up to £3m straight away.
Barristers joining chambers can be eligible to be part of the PP SIPP, and those who move away can leave the plan. However, all decisions need to be unanimous. With careful management, including policies about joining and leaving, the PP SIPP can be tailored to suit each chambers.
David Quinton is a senior consultant at Smith & Williamson. Email: David.quinton@smith.williamson.co.uk
Barristers can now contribute up to 100% of earnings—up to a generous cap of £235,000 for the 2008/09 tax year—securing income tax relief at up to 40% on that contribution. They can continue to fund as aggressively as they wish within their annual allowances, providing their total retirement fund does not exceed the annual lifetime allowance (£1.65m for 2008/09).
Self-invested pension plans (SIPPs) offer flexibility, control over investments, and the ability to hire and fire advisers without penalty. But unlike private company directors, the self-employed have been denied the ability to use pension savings to assist in their business—until now.
The sweeping reforms to pension regulation enable a barrister to use pension funds to purchase commercial property. Three important advantages flow from this route: tax relief on contributions going in; arms’ length rent payable to the pension fund (deductible as an expense to the business); and tax free capital growth on the building and its income. An individual SIPP may offer this facility, but the capacity to purchase commercial property will be restricted by the size of the fund and the annual lifetime allowance of the individual concerned. However, a recent development from the new legislation, the Professional Practices SIPP (PP SIPP), will overcome this obstacle.
Barristers, and groups of like-minded individuals generally, can make their pension contributions into a pooled fund and combine their annual allowances to create far greater buying power than an individual SIPP investor. If, say, 10 barristers in chambers joined together in a PP SIPP, they have the collective potential to buy and retain a building in the PP SIPP worth up to £16.5m. Existing pension arrangements can be transferred into the pooled scheme if required, and the fund can gear up by borrowing up to 50% of the net asset value of the pooled fund. Thus, if the 10 barristers transfer existing pension funds of £2m into their PP SIPP when they set it up, they can, with gearing, potentially buy commercial property of up to £3m straight away.
Barristers joining chambers can be eligible to be part of the PP SIPP, and those who move away can leave the plan. However, all decisions need to be unanimous. With careful management, including policies about joining and leaving, the PP SIPP can be tailored to suit each chambers.
David Quinton is a senior consultant at Smith & Williamson. Email: David.quinton@smith.williamson.co.uk
David Quinton explains how barristers can now use pension plans to help buy premises through the Professional Practices SIPP
Barristers, like any other self-employed professionals, need to consider carefully how to generate funds for retirement to ensure a comfortable lifestyle in older age. Recent developments have substantially improved the pension planning opportunities.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
AlphaBiolabs has been awarded the contract to provide drug, alcohol, and DNA testing services for Hull City Council, following a rigorous competitive tender process
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
At least not that way, says Richard Paige
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
