*/
Part-time Recorders are not entitled to judicial pensions, the Court of Appeal has held.
O’Brien v Department for Constitutional Affairs [2008] EWCA Civ 1448 concerned a part-time Recorder who sat from 1978 until he retired in 2005. Recorders usually continue in practice as a solicitor or barrister while sitting part-time.
Dermot O’Brien was ineligible for a pro-rata’d judicial pension because of a regulation excluding judicial office holders who are remunerated on a daily fee-paid basis. He claimed this amounted to unlawful discrimination against him as a part-time worker.
He argued that the relevant regulation, reg 17 of the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000, was incompatible with the Part-time Workers Framework Directive 97/81/EC, and should be disapplied. However, Lord Justice Maurice Kay and two judges found that judicial office holders are not “workers” in the sense of the regulation, and so there was no incompatibility.
O’Brien v Department for Constitutional Affairs [2008] EWCA Civ 1448 concerned a part-time Recorder who sat from 1978 until he retired in 2005. Recorders usually continue in practice as a solicitor or barrister while sitting part-time.
Dermot O’Brien was ineligible for a pro-rata’d judicial pension because of a regulation excluding judicial office holders who are remunerated on a daily fee-paid basis. He claimed this amounted to unlawful discrimination against him as a part-time worker.
He argued that the relevant regulation, reg 17 of the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000, was incompatible with the Part-time Workers Framework Directive 97/81/EC, and should be disapplied. However, Lord Justice Maurice Kay and two judges found that judicial office holders are not “workers” in the sense of the regulation, and so there was no incompatibility.
Part-time Recorders are not entitled to judicial pensions, the Court of Appeal has held.
Justice system requires urgent attention and next steps on the Harman Review
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
