*/
How is Scotland reducing knife deaths so effectively? A case study by Emily Beever outlines its youth work/public health approach to the problem
Over a decade ago, Scotland was facing a knife crime crisis. The introduction of the No Knives, Better Lives (NKBL) programme in 2009 was a response to the high incidence of knife crime and the concerning number of young people charged with handling an offensive weapon. NKBL is a national educational knife crime prevention programme funded by the Scottish Government and run by a national delivery team in YouthLink Scotland.
In 2006/07, 489 young people under 18 were convicted of handling an offensive weapon. Now, after years of hard work across sectors, we are in a very different position. The number of young people under 18 convicted of handling an offensive weapon has fallen by 81% and crimes of handling offensive weapons have decreased to their second lowest level since 1984.
Unfortunately, we have not seen this trend across the UK. Over the past year, there have been increasing spates of violent crime in England. Many have looked towards Scotland to learn from the reduction in violence and knife-related crime.
NKBL takes a youth work approach to prevention. In short, young people are supported to make positive decisions and practitioners learn in partnership with young people. A key element of this is understanding the reasons that may lead a young person to carry a knife. Coupled with a public health approach, treating knife crime as one would a disease, this means that effective prevention and early intervention programmes must also address the root causes.
The main motivators for carrying a knife are fear of crime and acquisition of status (see Dr Rebecca Foster, 'Knife crime interventions: what works?', September 2013, SCCJR Report No. 02/2014). Practitioners should take young people’s fear and efforts to protect themselves seriously. If left unacknowledged and unaddressed, we will not successfully deal with the cause of knife-related crime.
At the same time, practitioners must be cautious about projecting a false image of knife crime prevalence. With fear as a central motivator, it is easy to see how, as practitioners, we could worsen the situation with scaremongering tactics. We must strike a balance between acknowledging and dealing with young people’s fear, whilst not heightening their fears by exaggerating the prevalence of knife crime.
Social ‘norms’ must also be considered as part of the culture that may lead to a young person carrying a knife. We have integrated Robert Cialdini’s behavioural theory of the ‘big mistake’ - the idea that by emphasising the seriousness or extent of a problem, people can inadvertently reinforce it. For example, if we portray the image that knife crime is prevalent in a specific community, young people may feel the need to carry a knife because ‘everyone is doing it’.
Research from the youth justice sector in Scotland has also revealed the complex environment that contributes to knife-related crime amongst young people, including adolescent brain development; adverse childhood experiences (ACEs); school exclusion; and bereavement.
Knife crime is a complex issue that demands a multi-layered response. It is our belief that one agency or sector alone cannot solve the problem or adequately support young people. Rather, the response must involve professionals in health, policing, youth justice, education, youth work, social work and so on.
Despite operating with quite limited resources and capacity, NKBL has national presence and buy-in across Scotland. We credit our extensive network of practitioners working through national and local organisations to our success. The practitioner network is committed to and are prepared to invest in prevention and early intervention work. Working with local partners means we reach a much higher number of young people, thus have a higher chance of success.
Knife crime prevention is an ongoing piece of work. Statistics released in April 2018 show that school exclusions in Scotland involving weapons rose in 2016/17, an increase of 3.9% since 2012/13. Prevention, by its very nature, is something we should always be doing to stop crises from happening in the future. For us, one incident involving knives is one too many and we will continue to work with local partners to prevent knife carrying and crime.
Contributor Emily Beever, YouthLink Scotland
NKBL is a national initiative delivered at local level by practitioners including teachers, youth workers and community police officers. Local partners are supported by the NKBL team to develop and deliver youth engagement programmes, which raise awareness of the risks and consequences of carrying a knife and support young people to make positive life choices.
NKBL resources are shaped around the 4 Rs:
Reassurance | Risks | Resilience | Responsibility
In 2017/18, NKBL trained 300 practitioners; toured 60 schools with a play on knife crime reaching 12,000 young people; and trained 50 peer educators. See: noknivesbetterlives.com
Emily is a Senior Development Officer at YouthLink Scotland and manages the No Knives, Better Lives programme.
Over a decade ago, Scotland was facing a knife crime crisis. The introduction of the No Knives, Better Lives (NKBL) programme in 2009 was a response to the high incidence of knife crime and the concerning number of young people charged with handling an offensive weapon. NKBL is a national educational knife crime prevention programme funded by the Scottish Government and run by a national delivery team in YouthLink Scotland.
In 2006/07, 489 young people under 18 were convicted of handling an offensive weapon. Now, after years of hard work across sectors, we are in a very different position. The number of young people under 18 convicted of handling an offensive weapon has fallen by 81% and crimes of handling offensive weapons have decreased to their second lowest level since 1984.
Unfortunately, we have not seen this trend across the UK. Over the past year, there have been increasing spates of violent crime in England. Many have looked towards Scotland to learn from the reduction in violence and knife-related crime.
NKBL takes a youth work approach to prevention. In short, young people are supported to make positive decisions and practitioners learn in partnership with young people. A key element of this is understanding the reasons that may lead a young person to carry a knife. Coupled with a public health approach, treating knife crime as one would a disease, this means that effective prevention and early intervention programmes must also address the root causes.
The main motivators for carrying a knife are fear of crime and acquisition of status (see Dr Rebecca Foster, 'Knife crime interventions: what works?', September 2013, SCCJR Report No. 02/2014). Practitioners should take young people’s fear and efforts to protect themselves seriously. If left unacknowledged and unaddressed, we will not successfully deal with the cause of knife-related crime.
At the same time, practitioners must be cautious about projecting a false image of knife crime prevalence. With fear as a central motivator, it is easy to see how, as practitioners, we could worsen the situation with scaremongering tactics. We must strike a balance between acknowledging and dealing with young people’s fear, whilst not heightening their fears by exaggerating the prevalence of knife crime.
Social ‘norms’ must also be considered as part of the culture that may lead to a young person carrying a knife. We have integrated Robert Cialdini’s behavioural theory of the ‘big mistake’ - the idea that by emphasising the seriousness or extent of a problem, people can inadvertently reinforce it. For example, if we portray the image that knife crime is prevalent in a specific community, young people may feel the need to carry a knife because ‘everyone is doing it’.
Research from the youth justice sector in Scotland has also revealed the complex environment that contributes to knife-related crime amongst young people, including adolescent brain development; adverse childhood experiences (ACEs); school exclusion; and bereavement.
Knife crime is a complex issue that demands a multi-layered response. It is our belief that one agency or sector alone cannot solve the problem or adequately support young people. Rather, the response must involve professionals in health, policing, youth justice, education, youth work, social work and so on.
Despite operating with quite limited resources and capacity, NKBL has national presence and buy-in across Scotland. We credit our extensive network of practitioners working through national and local organisations to our success. The practitioner network is committed to and are prepared to invest in prevention and early intervention work. Working with local partners means we reach a much higher number of young people, thus have a higher chance of success.
Knife crime prevention is an ongoing piece of work. Statistics released in April 2018 show that school exclusions in Scotland involving weapons rose in 2016/17, an increase of 3.9% since 2012/13. Prevention, by its very nature, is something we should always be doing to stop crises from happening in the future. For us, one incident involving knives is one too many and we will continue to work with local partners to prevent knife carrying and crime.
Contributor Emily Beever, YouthLink Scotland
NKBL is a national initiative delivered at local level by practitioners including teachers, youth workers and community police officers. Local partners are supported by the NKBL team to develop and deliver youth engagement programmes, which raise awareness of the risks and consequences of carrying a knife and support young people to make positive life choices.
NKBL resources are shaped around the 4 Rs:
Reassurance | Risks | Resilience | Responsibility
In 2017/18, NKBL trained 300 practitioners; toured 60 schools with a play on knife crime reaching 12,000 young people; and trained 50 peer educators. See: noknivesbetterlives.com
How is Scotland reducing knife deaths so effectively? A case study by Emily Beever outlines its youth work/public health approach to the problem
The Bar Council is ready to support a turn to the efficiencies that will make a difference
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
Ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC continues his series explaining the impact on barristers. In part 2, a worked example shows the specific practicalities of adapting to the new system
Resolution of the criminal justice crisis does not lie in reheating old ideas that have been roundly rejected before, say Ed Vickers KC, Faras Baloch and Katie Bacon
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
Jury-less trial proposals threaten fairness, legitimacy and democracy without ending the backlog, writes Professor Cheryl Thomas KC (Hon), the UK’s leading expert on juries, judges and courts
