*/
Job title
Head of Chambers, Mansfield Chambers
Mansfield Chambers is a new chambers whose publicly funded practitioners defend the civil and human rights of individuals and groups of people
What have been some of the highlights of your career?
The cases that have had national interest and importance, primarily those that have taken on the system and brought about seismic change. One example is the Stephen Lawrence case. The Macpherson Report made 77 recommendations for change in the Met. These changes were far reaching. And what Mrs Lawrence, now Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon, has done is to show that ordinary individuals could ask all the right questions, and get a lot of them answered. She also periodically summoned the political leaders and police to meetings to ask them what they had done – in effect to hold them to account.
Another example is the Marchioness campaigner Eileen Dallaglio, as she did the same thing in taking on the State. As a result of her persistency with the Thames Safety enquiry, you can see the result. There are now designated life saving craft, highlighting of bridges and life jackets all along the river. The nature of traffic on the river was reconsidered. These are cases that brought about change; something I find heartening and heart warming about citizens prepared to stand up for what they believe in.
What do you credit your success to?
Two things I suppose. Firstly, I have a strong sense of justice driven by anger. I get upset when vulnerable people don’t get justice, whether inside or outside the system. Then, secondly, channelling that anger into collaborative working. Hence establishing Tooks Chambers in 1984. One of the first cases was the miners’ strike, where hopefully we made a difference. I think we achieved acquittals for nearly everyone we represented.
Who have been some of your most memorable clients, and why?
It is difficult to pick them out really. Arthur Scargill and Mohamed Al-Fayed were certainly two high profile clients. But one that does actually stick out now I’m thinking about it is Alfie Meadows. He was hit on the head during a demonstration against university fees. He had no prior convictions, was involved in a peaceful protest, and really he was making a point for all of us – higher education should be for all, not just those who can afford it. He was acquitted of violent disorder two years after he suffered life-threatening injuries.
Why did you want to become a barrister?
I was a child of television. When my parents got one, I became addicted. There was a US show called The Defenders, I haven’t seen it since but it was about a father and son. They took on amazing cases that all had a point about socio-political issues that lay behind every case. It was well filmed and well performed and I got drawn in and thought this is what I want to do. They mostly didn’t win their cases but clients felt liberated and represented, both literally and metaphorically. I felt there were few things you could do in life that provided a concrete end to it.
What is the best professional advice you’ve been given?
The advice I was given at the beginning of my career was as a barrister you will be compared to a surgeon. Treat each case at arm’s length so you do not get too involved. That was the advice and it was the best advice because I’ve done the opposite. This was an indication of how the profession had become a little remote. It was the best advice because it caused me to think that was not how I wanted to do it. I made time to get to know the people I was representing. Things have changed now, but that is how it was when I started out. Facts and feelings of the case I felt were key.
What advice would you give to anyone at the Junior Bar reading this?
My current concern has been the same since I started to practise – the need to have an overarching perspective. There is no use coming to the Bar unless you have an independent courageous spirit and you are committed to the principles of practice – i.e. this is what you really want to do. Don’t come to the Bar because you believe it will provide you with a living. Come to the Bar because you have an inner commitment to pursuing the ideals of the area in which you wish to practice. If you are concerned by the destruction of the environment and its resources – fight it on a legal front. You need to have a sense of purpose, otherwise forget it.
How do you relax?
I have always believed it is extremely important to have a whole space in your life that is different to your working life; because if not, you will frazzle. You need the space to recharge different stimuli. For me that is through music, theatre, film, and playing the drums (badly). Above all that, I have six children, who are all grown up now, so I have always had a house full of children and they weren’t interested in what Dad did every day. I have benefitted hugely from the fact that all of my children had a sense of entertainment. I believe we have to engage in another generation, something I have done as a barrister in getting the younger generation to engage in the communities they live.
Michael Mansfield QC was interviewed by Guy Hewetson of Hewetson Shah
Another example is the Marchioness campaigner Eileen Dallaglio, as she did the same thing in taking on the State. As a result of her persistency with the Thames Safety enquiry, you can see the result. There are now designated life saving craft, highlighting of bridges and life jackets all along the river. The nature of traffic on the river was reconsidered. These are cases that brought about change; something I find heartening and heart warming about citizens prepared to stand up for what they believe in.
What do you credit your success to?
Two things I suppose. Firstly, I have a strong sense of justice driven by anger. I get upset when vulnerable people don’t get justice, whether inside or outside the system. Then, secondly, channelling that anger into collaborative working. Hence establishing Tooks Chambers in 1984. One of the first cases was the miners’ strike, where hopefully we made a difference. I think we achieved acquittals for nearly everyone we represented.
Who have been some of your most memorable clients, and why?
It is difficult to pick them out really. Arthur Scargill and Mohamed Al-Fayed were certainly two high profile clients. But one that does actually stick out now I’m thinking about it is Alfie Meadows. He was hit on the head during a demonstration against university fees. He had no prior convictions, was involved in a peaceful protest, and really he was making a point for all of us – higher education should be for all, not just those who can afford it. He was acquitted of violent disorder two years after he suffered life-threatening injuries.
Why did you want to become a barrister?
I was a child of television. When my parents got one, I became addicted. There was a US show called The Defenders, I haven’t seen it since but it was about a father and son. They took on amazing cases that all had a point about socio-political issues that lay behind every case. It was well filmed and well performed and I got drawn in and thought this is what I want to do. They mostly didn’t win their cases but clients felt liberated and represented, both literally and metaphorically. I felt there were few things you could do in life that provided a concrete end to it.
What is the best professional advice you’ve been given?
The advice I was given at the beginning of my career was as a barrister you will be compared to a surgeon. Treat each case at arm’s length so you do not get too involved. That was the advice and it was the best advice because I’ve done the opposite. This was an indication of how the profession had become a little remote. It was the best advice because it caused me to think that was not how I wanted to do it. I made time to get to know the people I was representing. Things have changed now, but that is how it was when I started out. Facts and feelings of the case I felt were key.
What advice would you give to anyone at the Junior Bar reading this?
My current concern has been the same since I started to practise – the need to have an overarching perspective. There is no use coming to the Bar unless you have an independent courageous spirit and you are committed to the principles of practice – i.e. this is what you really want to do. Don’t come to the Bar because you believe it will provide you with a living. Come to the Bar because you have an inner commitment to pursuing the ideals of the area in which you wish to practice. If you are concerned by the destruction of the environment and its resources – fight it on a legal front. You need to have a sense of purpose, otherwise forget it.
How do you relax?
I have always believed it is extremely important to have a whole space in your life that is different to your working life; because if not, you will frazzle. You need the space to recharge different stimuli. For me that is through music, theatre, film, and playing the drums (badly). Above all that, I have six children, who are all grown up now, so I have always had a house full of children and they weren’t interested in what Dad did every day. I have benefitted hugely from the fact that all of my children had a sense of entertainment. I believe we have to engage in another generation, something I have done as a barrister in getting the younger generation to engage in the communities they live.
Michael Mansfield QC was interviewed by Guy Hewetson of Hewetson Shah
Job title
Head of Chambers, Mansfield Chambers
Mansfield Chambers is a new chambers whose publicly funded practitioners defend the civil and human rights of individuals and groups of people
What have been some of the highlights of your career?
The cases that have had national interest and importance, primarily those that have taken on the system and brought about seismic change. One example is the Stephen Lawrence case. The Macpherson Report made 77 recommendations for change in the Met. These changes were far reaching. And what Mrs Lawrence, now Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon, has done is to show that ordinary individuals could ask all the right questions, and get a lot of them answered. She also periodically summoned the political leaders and police to meetings to ask them what they had done – in effect to hold them to account.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
In an era of patient-centred care and growing concern over misconduct in medical settings, why do women still lack the right to choose women consultants for examination and treatment? Charles Davey investigates
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
