*/
The Bar Council condemned the ‘remorseless succession’ of legal aid funding cuts, but said changes to advocates’ fees were a ‘step in the right direction’.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s announcement over the reformed advocates’ graduated fee scheme (AGFS) the Bar Chair, Andrew Walker QC, said that the ‘remorseless succession’ of cuts have caused ‘real and pressing concerns’ about the viability and sustainability of many at the criminal Bar, and about whether the Bar will be able to continue to recruit and retain the practitioners needed in the future.
But he said the changes, which increase the payments made to some advocates, represent ‘an important step in the right direction for the long-term future of the criminal Bar’.
Walker said it was reassuring to see a number of the shortcomings in the original proposals, had been addressed in the final scheme, ‘even if the gains at an individual level are modest’.
The changes to the AGFS, made in conjunction with earlier amendments to the litigators’ graduated fee scheme, which cut the fees paid to solicitors, are intended to be cost-neutral.
The Law Society said the move amounted to ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’. It warned that ‘depriving one beleaguered portion of the criminal justice system to fund another could inflict further instability on the under-pressure system’.
Meanwhile, the Bar Council told regulators that they show their independence from government by speaking out about the impact of legal aid cuts.
Responding to the Legal Services Board’s business plan consultation, the Bar Council said the watchdog ‘should not shy away’ from criticising government policy, particularly given that one of its objectives is improving access to justice.
The Bar Council condemned the ‘remorseless succession’ of legal aid funding cuts, but said changes to advocates’ fees were a ‘step in the right direction’.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s announcement over the reformed advocates’ graduated fee scheme (AGFS) the Bar Chair, Andrew Walker QC, said that the ‘remorseless succession’ of cuts have caused ‘real and pressing concerns’ about the viability and sustainability of many at the criminal Bar, and about whether the Bar will be able to continue to recruit and retain the practitioners needed in the future.
But he said the changes, which increase the payments made to some advocates, represent ‘an important step in the right direction for the long-term future of the criminal Bar’.
Walker said it was reassuring to see a number of the shortcomings in the original proposals, had been addressed in the final scheme, ‘even if the gains at an individual level are modest’.
The changes to the AGFS, made in conjunction with earlier amendments to the litigators’ graduated fee scheme, which cut the fees paid to solicitors, are intended to be cost-neutral.
The Law Society said the move amounted to ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’. It warned that ‘depriving one beleaguered portion of the criminal justice system to fund another could inflict further instability on the under-pressure system’.
Meanwhile, the Bar Council told regulators that they show their independence from government by speaking out about the impact of legal aid cuts.
Responding to the Legal Services Board’s business plan consultation, the Bar Council said the watchdog ‘should not shy away’ from criticising government policy, particularly given that one of its objectives is improving access to justice.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
