*/
The law is broken. Help us prove it, writes Rohini Teather
In 2019, the long awaited LASPO post-implementation review deemed the legal aid market to be ‘operating at sufficient levels to meet demand’, adding that ‘more research is required to determine the long-term sustainability of the profession’ (para 816, p 195). While some information on practitioners and organisations has been shared by the Bar Council, Law Society and Crown Prosecution Service (resulting in the publication of a data compendium about criminal legal aid), this research by the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) hasn’t been forthcoming. Nor does it appear that there is any intention of looking at the legal aid system as a whole; a marketplace of need, supply and demand.
This time last year, the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) decided that something different was needed – a census that sought data on every single legal aid practitioner in England and Wales. Every barrister, solicitor, legal executive, paralegal, clerk, caseworker and manager working in publicly funded law. All of those aspiring to join the profession and those who have made the decision to leave it. We want to reach every one of you to build a comprehensive picture of what life is like on the legal aid frontline; to gather demographic information but also to seek to understand issues like the connection between fee levels and commercial viability, retention and succession planning; the path that each practitioner took into the profession; the working conditions in practice and their intentions regarding it. We need to know who the people are who make up the provider base and what it will look like in the years to come.
The data that we have isn’t clear. But we know that in 2013 there were 1,592 firms with criminal legal aid contracts (Legal Services Commission, Annual Report and Accounts 2012-13 (HC337, 31.3.2013) p 16). By March 2021 this had dropped to 1,104 (Alex Chalk MP, Written Questions: Legal Aid Scheme: Contracts (UIN 166396, 16.3.2021)) – a loss of 488. Similarly, in 2013 there were 1,881 firms with contracts in civil legal aid. Eight years on and there are 1,445 – a reduction of 436. This may be due to a number of reasons, but we lack the data to tell us.
Over the past six months, we have been working with academics from Newcastle University, Cardiff University and University College London to create and refine the census to make it as user-friendly as possible. A pilot phase was completed over January and February and the census itself launched on 12 April via social media, representative body networks, and academic institutions. Practitioners can complete the survey online and are being asked to answer questions in the following capacities:
The census is open from April to June and the academic team will then spend the summer anonymising and analysing the data before reporting in early autumn.
We believe this to be the most ambitious survey ever undertaken into legal aid and its timing could not be more crucial. Data from the census will feed into both Sir Christopher Bellamy QC’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid and the MOJ’s upcoming review of the sustainability of civil and family legal aid. The research is closely aligned to the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Legal Aid’s sustainability inquiry. Please support us by getting involved: we need the whole legal aid community to stand up and be counted.
In 2019, the long awaited LASPO post-implementation review deemed the legal aid market to be ‘operating at sufficient levels to meet demand’, adding that ‘more research is required to determine the long-term sustainability of the profession’ (para 816, p 195). While some information on practitioners and organisations has been shared by the Bar Council, Law Society and Crown Prosecution Service (resulting in the publication of a data compendium about criminal legal aid), this research by the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) hasn’t been forthcoming. Nor does it appear that there is any intention of looking at the legal aid system as a whole; a marketplace of need, supply and demand.
This time last year, the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) decided that something different was needed – a census that sought data on every single legal aid practitioner in England and Wales. Every barrister, solicitor, legal executive, paralegal, clerk, caseworker and manager working in publicly funded law. All of those aspiring to join the profession and those who have made the decision to leave it. We want to reach every one of you to build a comprehensive picture of what life is like on the legal aid frontline; to gather demographic information but also to seek to understand issues like the connection between fee levels and commercial viability, retention and succession planning; the path that each practitioner took into the profession; the working conditions in practice and their intentions regarding it. We need to know who the people are who make up the provider base and what it will look like in the years to come.
The data that we have isn’t clear. But we know that in 2013 there were 1,592 firms with criminal legal aid contracts (Legal Services Commission, Annual Report and Accounts 2012-13 (HC337, 31.3.2013) p 16). By March 2021 this had dropped to 1,104 (Alex Chalk MP, Written Questions: Legal Aid Scheme: Contracts (UIN 166396, 16.3.2021)) – a loss of 488. Similarly, in 2013 there were 1,881 firms with contracts in civil legal aid. Eight years on and there are 1,445 – a reduction of 436. This may be due to a number of reasons, but we lack the data to tell us.
Over the past six months, we have been working with academics from Newcastle University, Cardiff University and University College London to create and refine the census to make it as user-friendly as possible. A pilot phase was completed over January and February and the census itself launched on 12 April via social media, representative body networks, and academic institutions. Practitioners can complete the survey online and are being asked to answer questions in the following capacities:
The census is open from April to June and the academic team will then spend the summer anonymising and analysing the data before reporting in early autumn.
We believe this to be the most ambitious survey ever undertaken into legal aid and its timing could not be more crucial. Data from the census will feed into both Sir Christopher Bellamy QC’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid and the MOJ’s upcoming review of the sustainability of civil and family legal aid. The research is closely aligned to the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Legal Aid’s sustainability inquiry. Please support us by getting involved: we need the whole legal aid community to stand up and be counted.
The law is broken. Help us prove it, writes Rohini Teather
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
