*/
Concerns over the impact of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) 2012 on access to justice have been confirmed in the preliminary results of a Bar Council survey.
Increases in court delays were reported by 80% of family practitioner respondents and 64% of civil practitioners. A significant rise in the number of litigants-in-person was noted by 88% (family) and 70% (civil).
The online survey, launched in April and part of a wider research project in association with Professor Graham Cookson from the University of Surrey, was completed by 716 respondents (90% of whom were barristers). Sixty-one per cent reported an increase in the number of lay clients experiencing difficulties accessing legal advice and representation and 60% reported an increase in the number of lay clients requesting free advice and representation.
The survey also addressed the impact on a barrister’s practice. A decrease in case work was reported by 72% of family practitioners; 60% of those involved in civil legal aid; and by 45% in civil litigation. Declining fee income was reported by 69% in family legal aid work; 62% in civil legal aid work; and 53% involved in civil litigation.
Funding arrangements were highlighted, with 27% of barrister respondents reporting a general increase in interest in fixed fees, deferred payment, pro bono assessment of risk, litigation funding and damages-based agreements. Issues with the transition to post-Jackson conditional fee agreements were reported by 42% of civil litigators.
While the majority had no immediate plans to leave the Bar, a significant minority were considering a move to judicial or other positions before 2015. Many indicated that the effects of LASPO had caused them to think about the viability of their career. Bar Chairman Nicholas Lavender QC called for a “comprehensive post-implementation review”, pledging that the Bar Council would work with policy makers to mitigate the harmful effects. “The results will help to guide the formulation of policy and provide some strong messages to government, as we approach the general election,” he said.
Meanwhile, an analysis of recently published Legal Aid Agency (LAA) data showed a 61% drop in payments to barristers by the LAA for family law proceedings, which fell from £38m in 2012/13 to £15m in 2013/14. LawyerSupportedMediation.com (LSM), which analysed the figures, also calculated that the Ministry of Justice is on course to reduce its spend on solicitors’ fees by over £100m compared to 2012/13.
LSM founder Marc Lopatin said: “How impacted barristers respond will go some way to defining how family law services will evolve. To survive, barristers may have little choice but to start competing with solicitors for divorcing clients. If they do, this will break the historic referral bond between the two professions and create the colourful spectacle of fixed-fee barristers being hired by clients with the express purpose of keeping them both out of court.”
A freedom of information request submitted by LSM revealed that the withdrawal of legal aid for most family disputes resulted in mediation numbers plummeting by almost 40% in 2013/14 – the first full year of government cuts. The number of parents heading to court without a lawyer had increased by over 19,000.
The online survey, launched in April and part of a wider research project in association with Professor Graham Cookson from the University of Surrey, was completed by 716 respondents (90% of whom were barristers). Sixty-one per cent reported an increase in the number of lay clients experiencing difficulties accessing legal advice and representation and 60% reported an increase in the number of lay clients requesting free advice and representation.
The survey also addressed the impact on a barrister’s practice. A decrease in case work was reported by 72% of family practitioners; 60% of those involved in civil legal aid; and by 45% in civil litigation. Declining fee income was reported by 69% in family legal aid work; 62% in civil legal aid work; and 53% involved in civil litigation.
Funding arrangements were highlighted, with 27% of barrister respondents reporting a general increase in interest in fixed fees, deferred payment, pro bono assessment of risk, litigation funding and damages-based agreements. Issues with the transition to post-Jackson conditional fee agreements were reported by 42% of civil litigators.
While the majority had no immediate plans to leave the Bar, a significant minority were considering a move to judicial or other positions before 2015. Many indicated that the effects of LASPO had caused them to think about the viability of their career. Bar Chairman Nicholas Lavender QC called for a “comprehensive post-implementation review”, pledging that the Bar Council would work with policy makers to mitigate the harmful effects. “The results will help to guide the formulation of policy and provide some strong messages to government, as we approach the general election,” he said.
Meanwhile, an analysis of recently published Legal Aid Agency (LAA) data showed a 61% drop in payments to barristers by the LAA for family law proceedings, which fell from £38m in 2012/13 to £15m in 2013/14. LawyerSupportedMediation.com (LSM), which analysed the figures, also calculated that the Ministry of Justice is on course to reduce its spend on solicitors’ fees by over £100m compared to 2012/13.
LSM founder Marc Lopatin said: “How impacted barristers respond will go some way to defining how family law services will evolve. To survive, barristers may have little choice but to start competing with solicitors for divorcing clients. If they do, this will break the historic referral bond between the two professions and create the colourful spectacle of fixed-fee barristers being hired by clients with the express purpose of keeping them both out of court.”
A freedom of information request submitted by LSM revealed that the withdrawal of legal aid for most family disputes resulted in mediation numbers plummeting by almost 40% in 2013/14 – the first full year of government cuts. The number of parents heading to court without a lawyer had increased by over 19,000.
Concerns over the impact of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) 2012 on access to justice have been confirmed in the preliminary results of a Bar Council survey.
Increases in court delays were reported by 80% of family practitioner respondents and 64% of civil practitioners. A significant rise in the number of litigants-in-person was noted by 88% (family) and 70% (civil).
Kirsty Brimelow KC, Chair of the Bar, sets our course for 2026
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
Asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Q and A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
Jury-less trial proposals threaten fairness, legitimacy and democracy without ending the backlog, writes Professor Cheryl Thomas KC (Hon), the UK’s leading expert on juries, judges and courts
Are you ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC explains the biggest change since HMRC launched self-assessment more than 30 years ago... and its impact on the Bar
Marking one year since a Bar disciplinary tribunal dismissed all charges against her, Dr Charlotte Proudman discusses the experience, her formative years and next steps. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
