*/
Edited by Dominic Shellard
278 pages, paperback, ISBN 978-1854595430
Published 2008 by Nick Hern Books, £9.99
To many of my generation it isn’t difficult to recall the excitement every Sunday of comparing the views of Tynan and Harold Hobson in the Observer and the Sunday Times. Wasn’t it Jimmy Porter who defined the classic sound of an English Sunday morning as that of “Harold Hobson barking up the wrong tree”?
Shellard describes Tynan as “seen to write for the young, the left and the new” and Hobson for “the middle aged, the right and the past”. Certainly Tynan was for all things German, social realism, American musicals, and new plays that dealt with the contemporary world, while Hobson preferred the French, the theatre of the absurd and Christian verse drama. Yet both responded enthusiastically to the first nights of “Waiting for Godot” and “Look Back in Anger”.
What makes Tynan so important and so readable, even 28 years after his tragically early death, is that he was not only a fine and perceptive critic but also a great journalist with an extraordinary ability to re-create a theatrical performance in print. Shellard begins his selection with a number of remarkable extracts from Tynan’s 1950 book He That Plays the King. (Tynan himself gave a less than successful performance as the Player King in Alec Guiness’s disastrous modern dress “Hamlet” in 1951.) Those extracts include descriptions of Olivier’s “Richard III”, “Oedipus Rex” and “King Lear”, Gielgud’s 1944 “Hamlet” and Richardson’s “Falstaff”, with Olivier as Justice Shallow. All of them must have been written when Tynan was still only in his late teens!
One of my few regrets at Shellard’s selection is his omission of the description of Olivier’s death fall at the end of his 1959 Stratford “Coriolanus”—“poised on a promontory some 12 feet above the stage he topples forward to be caught by the ankles so that he dangles, inverted, like the slaughtered Mussolini. A more shocking, less sentimental death I have not seen in the theatre: it is at once proud and ignominious, as befits the titanic fool who dies it”. Almost 50 years later Tynan’s words still bring it back as vividly as ever. I should know. I was there.
Of course Tynan wasn’t right about everything. He was wrong about the thrust stage and about theatre in the round and even at first about Harold Pinter. But he was right about so much. He was right about Brecht and the Berliner Ensemble, about Osborne and the Royal Court, about Beckett and Theatre Workshop. He championed the need for a National Theatre and the importance of abolishing theatre censorship. And as Tom Stoppard writes in his Foreward “you can open this book on almost any page and come across a phrase or a vignette which is the next best thing to being there”.
Theatre Writings is a fascinating record of 20 of the most important years of British theatre. It is living history of the highest order. It should be compulsive reading for anyone concerned with the history of our theatre.
Martin Bowley QC
To many of my generation it isn’t difficult to recall the excitement every Sunday of comparing the views of Tynan and Harold Hobson in the Observer and the Sunday Times. Wasn’t it Jimmy Porter who defined the classic sound of an English Sunday morning as that of “Harold Hobson barking up the wrong tree”?
Shellard describes Tynan as “seen to write for the young, the left and the new” and Hobson for “the middle aged, the right and the past”. Certainly Tynan was for all things German, social realism, American musicals, and new plays that dealt with the contemporary world, while Hobson preferred the French, the theatre of the absurd and Christian verse drama. Yet both responded enthusiastically to the first nights of “Waiting for Godot” and “Look Back in Anger”.
What makes Tynan so important and so readable, even 28 years after his tragically early death, is that he was not only a fine and perceptive critic but also a great journalist with an extraordinary ability to re-create a theatrical performance in print. Shellard begins his selection with a number of remarkable extracts from Tynan’s 1950 book He That Plays the King. (Tynan himself gave a less than successful performance as the Player King in Alec Guiness’s disastrous modern dress “Hamlet” in 1951.) Those extracts include descriptions of Olivier’s “Richard III”, “Oedipus Rex” and “King Lear”, Gielgud’s 1944 “Hamlet” and Richardson’s “Falstaff”, with Olivier as Justice Shallow. All of them must have been written when Tynan was still only in his late teens!
One of my few regrets at Shellard’s selection is his omission of the description of Olivier’s death fall at the end of his 1959 Stratford “Coriolanus”—“poised on a promontory some 12 feet above the stage he topples forward to be caught by the ankles so that he dangles, inverted, like the slaughtered Mussolini. A more shocking, less sentimental death I have not seen in the theatre: it is at once proud and ignominious, as befits the titanic fool who dies it”. Almost 50 years later Tynan’s words still bring it back as vividly as ever. I should know. I was there.
Of course Tynan wasn’t right about everything. He was wrong about the thrust stage and about theatre in the round and even at first about Harold Pinter. But he was right about so much. He was right about Brecht and the Berliner Ensemble, about Osborne and the Royal Court, about Beckett and Theatre Workshop. He championed the need for a National Theatre and the importance of abolishing theatre censorship. And as Tom Stoppard writes in his Foreward “you can open this book on almost any page and come across a phrase or a vignette which is the next best thing to being there”.
Theatre Writings is a fascinating record of 20 of the most important years of British theatre. It is living history of the highest order. It should be compulsive reading for anyone concerned with the history of our theatre.
Martin Bowley QC
Edited by Dominic Shellard
278 pages, paperback, ISBN 978-1854595430
Published 2008 by Nick Hern Books, £9.99
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
If the Bar cannot define and prohibit bullying behaviour, what chance do we have of persuading the Judiciary to do so? Darren Howe QC and Professor Jo Delahunty QC's call to action on codification plus suggested strategies for dealing with bullying from the Bar and Bench
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright