*/
It might interest you to read that the Government Legal Department (GLD), a national legal organisation of just over 3,000, is the biggest litigator in the Supreme Court. You may also be intrigued to know that GLD engages external counsel to defend the government in court on some of the most-high profile and pivotal cases of the day.
We source this counsel via three Attorney General’s Panels (A, B and C), for both London and the regions. In being appointed to panel, many work on what can be career defining cases that still offer flexibility in being able to pick and choose what you agree to work on.
Panel A undertakes the most complex and often most high-profile government cases and counsel often have more than 10 years’ advocacy experience. B panel considers substantial cases and will often be instructed if expert knowledge of a specific area is required. Members of B panel will have between 5 and 10 years’ advocacy experience. Panel C members will generally have between 2 and 5 years’ advocacy experience but those with more experience can apply. Those appointed to the C panel will often become the A and B panel members of the future.
The panels are open to both barristers and solicitors with Higher Rights of Audience. Those appointed work with lawyers from across government in various departments on a vast array of issues.
Sadiya Choudhury, member of London A panel notes:
‘I very much value the experience I have gained as a barrister on panel. It has helped me develop my advisory and litigation practice for all my clients, not just those I act for when on panel. You will not get a better opportunity to work for a wide variety of clients with a range of legal issues in your career at the Bar.’
The type of work you might find on panels ranges from National Security to immigration. The selection board want to know your strengths and hear from those with an array of expertise, even if public law is not a common practice area.
Our panels need a broad range of practitioners to ensure they are representative of the country and include experts on many different practice areas. Likewise, even if your area of expertise, like tax or charity, involves less advocacy do still apply as the panels require individuals who can respond to the many different issues that arise.
You are encouraged to keep an active practice beyond panel work, but you can expect to receive regular instructions, with at least 60% of those on all the panels receiving regular work.
We are also developing an improved management information pack and system for allocations, to ensure that our instructions reflect our diverse panel membership. This forms part of our efforts to address the findings of the 2022 Bar Council report Government legal panels: an analysis of membership by ethnicity and sex.
Panel work, says Azeem Suterwalla, member of London A:
‘not only provides an excellent mix in the type of work you are able to undertake, but also a chance to work with or be against leading Counsel. Being on the A Panel also allows you to work closely with senior lawyers at GLD and to work as part of a team.’
Attorney General, the Rt Hon Victoria Prentis KC MP has reflected on the importance of the panels:
‘The panels are vitally important and being a member is a huge honour for any legal professional. It is an opportunity to provide counsel to Government and appear as an advocate on behalf of the Crown on some of the most important and complex cases of the day.
‘We want the best candidates to apply from a range of law firms and chambers, and I thoroughly encourage everyone to consider applying.’
For detailed information visit the Government Legal Department.
It might interest you to read that the Government Legal Department (GLD), a national legal organisation of just over 3,000, is the biggest litigator in the Supreme Court. You may also be intrigued to know that GLD engages external counsel to defend the government in court on some of the most-high profile and pivotal cases of the day.
We source this counsel via three Attorney General’s Panels (A, B and C), for both London and the regions. In being appointed to panel, many work on what can be career defining cases that still offer flexibility in being able to pick and choose what you agree to work on.
Panel A undertakes the most complex and often most high-profile government cases and counsel often have more than 10 years’ advocacy experience. B panel considers substantial cases and will often be instructed if expert knowledge of a specific area is required. Members of B panel will have between 5 and 10 years’ advocacy experience. Panel C members will generally have between 2 and 5 years’ advocacy experience but those with more experience can apply. Those appointed to the C panel will often become the A and B panel members of the future.
The panels are open to both barristers and solicitors with Higher Rights of Audience. Those appointed work with lawyers from across government in various departments on a vast array of issues.
Sadiya Choudhury, member of London A panel notes:
‘I very much value the experience I have gained as a barrister on panel. It has helped me develop my advisory and litigation practice for all my clients, not just those I act for when on panel. You will not get a better opportunity to work for a wide variety of clients with a range of legal issues in your career at the Bar.’
The type of work you might find on panels ranges from National Security to immigration. The selection board want to know your strengths and hear from those with an array of expertise, even if public law is not a common practice area.
Our panels need a broad range of practitioners to ensure they are representative of the country and include experts on many different practice areas. Likewise, even if your area of expertise, like tax or charity, involves less advocacy do still apply as the panels require individuals who can respond to the many different issues that arise.
You are encouraged to keep an active practice beyond panel work, but you can expect to receive regular instructions, with at least 60% of those on all the panels receiving regular work.
We are also developing an improved management information pack and system for allocations, to ensure that our instructions reflect our diverse panel membership. This forms part of our efforts to address the findings of the 2022 Bar Council report Government legal panels: an analysis of membership by ethnicity and sex.
Panel work, says Azeem Suterwalla, member of London A:
‘not only provides an excellent mix in the type of work you are able to undertake, but also a chance to work with or be against leading Counsel. Being on the A Panel also allows you to work closely with senior lawyers at GLD and to work as part of a team.’
Attorney General, the Rt Hon Victoria Prentis KC MP has reflected on the importance of the panels:
‘The panels are vitally important and being a member is a huge honour for any legal professional. It is an opportunity to provide counsel to Government and appear as an advocate on behalf of the Crown on some of the most important and complex cases of the day.
‘We want the best candidates to apply from a range of law firms and chambers, and I thoroughly encourage everyone to consider applying.’
For detailed information visit the Government Legal Department.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will