*/
Damian Hickman offers an insight into the challenges of running a busy international arbitration centre –from debugging services, extra-large entourages and last-minute visa requests
Writing in the Global Arbitration Review in May 2016, J William Rowley QC emphasised that ‘the importance of excellent, purpose-built arbitration hearing facilities cannot be over-estimated in the choice of… seat’.
He was defending the attractions of London as a centre of international dispute resolution in face of criticisms levelled by the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, who argued in his Bailii Lecture in 2016 that development of the common law was being impeded by the growth in arbitration.
According to Rowley: ‘The International Dispute Resolution Centre (IDRC) in Fleet Street is undoubtedly the largest and most-used arbitral hearing centre in the world. Singapore has been given kudos for its up-to-date and comfortable hearing rooms at Maxwell Chambers and the new ICC and HKIAC hearing facilities in Paris and Hong Kong are also first class, but the IDRC has a much greater capacity and a markedly greater throughput than Hong Kong, Singapore and Paris combined. It also has more extensive facilities and operates more efficiently than any other centre.’
Indeed, in the International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration (Queen Mary/White & Case, 2015), factors such as the location and quality of hearing facilities and high level of administration were found to increase the attractiveness of a seat.
The IDRC was set up in 2000. Alongside other London-based dispute resolution bodies, such as the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), it has experienced a huge increase in volume of business and size of hearings over the last decade. An average hearing 10 years ago would have brought around 20 attendees, with larger hearings hosting up to 40 people. One retiring room per party would be expected, which would seat around 10 people. Now an average case brings 30-35 people, with 60-80 people attending the larger cases. Multiple large rooms are expected for each party, ideally on the same floor. With all this comes an increase in technological requirements, and the IDRC has had to evolve its services continuously to meet these needs. For example, introducing a ‘premier suite’ which offers IDR-desks, a built-in PA system and translation booth, live audio-visual feeds, document evidence display and HD video conferencing facilities.
The centre is opening more regularly at weekends and evenings for set-up. In an average case, clients will require, at the very least, document/evidence presentation, transcription services/audio recording and a PA system. Most of the larger cases now also require HD video conferencing facilities and translation booths, all adding to the need for more space. More exacting requirements can include requests for a private client network (WIFI) and multiple printers/copiers in the retiring rooms.
In the past, the IDRC has received requests for 24-hour security guards, metal detectors in the reception area, ‘debugging’ of rooms and an individual bathroom to which only a single judge has access. Some cases are also of huge public interest, which brings its own challenges. Clients can require secure back door access, when coping with press intrusion. Most of the key challenges relate to last-minute requests – for example, if a client can’t get a visa in time or has transport issues, a video conference or skype call may need to be set up in minutes. It is surprising how often clients attend the IDRC having not organised transcription services. Fortunately we have an extremely good working relationship with some of the best companies in London, so this can be organised at short notice.
Cost was identified as arbitration’s worst feature in the survey cited above, and the IDRC strives to ensure it remains good value for money within the market. The challenge is ensuring client awareness of this. In fact, with a steady increase in the number of arbitrations, mediations and disciplinary hearings and the increase in larger hearings, the board of directors of the IDRC is currently considering a move to larger premises. Fortunately, due to its privately funded nature, it is able to react and evolve to the ever-changing needs of international dispute resolution; competition may come from other capital cities opening similar centres around the world.
A private company with shareholders ranging from the City of London to major London and international law firms, members of the Bar and individual arbitrators, the IDRC was set up in 2000 by founder and CEO Damian Hickman. The first chairman was Lord Alexander of Weedon; followed by Bob Ayling (ex-CEO of British Airways); and the current chairman is Michael Payton (QC) Hon, chairman of Clyde & Co.
The original centre was located at Breams Buildings and consisted of six suites over 11,000ft2. It moved to 70 Fleet Street in 2004 with 11 suites over 25,000ft2. In 2011, the IDRC expanded into the building next door, creating a further three suites and is now using over 35,000ft2. The IDRC currently hosts up to 400 arbitrations and 400 mediations each year (as well as providing space for training courses, conferences, seminars, evening events and so on), with its largest available room capable of seating up to 100 people.
The centre enjoys the support of some of the major bodies in London concerned with dispute resolution, some of whom have offices at the IDRC (LCIA, Cedr, Jams International, Concordis International and ResoLex). Collaborators rather than competitors, the majority of their hearings are held at the IDRC.
Contributor Damian Hickman is Chief Executive Officer of the International Dispute Resolution Centre
Damian Hickman is Chief Executive Officer of the International Dispute Resolution Centre
He was defending the attractions of London as a centre of international dispute resolution in face of criticisms levelled by the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, who argued in his Bailii Lecture in 2016 that development of the common law was being impeded by the growth in arbitration.
According to Rowley: ‘The International Dispute Resolution Centre (IDRC) in Fleet Street is undoubtedly the largest and most-used arbitral hearing centre in the world. Singapore has been given kudos for its up-to-date and comfortable hearing rooms at Maxwell Chambers and the new ICC and HKIAC hearing facilities in Paris and Hong Kong are also first class, but the IDRC has a much greater capacity and a markedly greater throughput than Hong Kong, Singapore and Paris combined. It also has more extensive facilities and operates more efficiently than any other centre.’
Indeed, in the International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration (Queen Mary/White & Case, 2015), factors such as the location and quality of hearing facilities and high level of administration were found to increase the attractiveness of a seat.
The IDRC was set up in 2000. Alongside other London-based dispute resolution bodies, such as the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), it has experienced a huge increase in volume of business and size of hearings over the last decade. An average hearing 10 years ago would have brought around 20 attendees, with larger hearings hosting up to 40 people. One retiring room per party would be expected, which would seat around 10 people. Now an average case brings 30-35 people, with 60-80 people attending the larger cases. Multiple large rooms are expected for each party, ideally on the same floor. With all this comes an increase in technological requirements, and the IDRC has had to evolve its services continuously to meet these needs. For example, introducing a ‘premier suite’ which offers IDR-desks, a built-in PA system and translation booth, live audio-visual feeds, document evidence display and HD video conferencing facilities.
The centre is opening more regularly at weekends and evenings for set-up. In an average case, clients will require, at the very least, document/evidence presentation, transcription services/audio recording and a PA system. Most of the larger cases now also require HD video conferencing facilities and translation booths, all adding to the need for more space. More exacting requirements can include requests for a private client network (WIFI) and multiple printers/copiers in the retiring rooms.
In the past, the IDRC has received requests for 24-hour security guards, metal detectors in the reception area, ‘debugging’ of rooms and an individual bathroom to which only a single judge has access. Some cases are also of huge public interest, which brings its own challenges. Clients can require secure back door access, when coping with press intrusion. Most of the key challenges relate to last-minute requests – for example, if a client can’t get a visa in time or has transport issues, a video conference or skype call may need to be set up in minutes. It is surprising how often clients attend the IDRC having not organised transcription services. Fortunately we have an extremely good working relationship with some of the best companies in London, so this can be organised at short notice.
Cost was identified as arbitration’s worst feature in the survey cited above, and the IDRC strives to ensure it remains good value for money within the market. The challenge is ensuring client awareness of this. In fact, with a steady increase in the number of arbitrations, mediations and disciplinary hearings and the increase in larger hearings, the board of directors of the IDRC is currently considering a move to larger premises. Fortunately, due to its privately funded nature, it is able to react and evolve to the ever-changing needs of international dispute resolution; competition may come from other capital cities opening similar centres around the world.
A private company with shareholders ranging from the City of London to major London and international law firms, members of the Bar and individual arbitrators, the IDRC was set up in 2000 by founder and CEO Damian Hickman. The first chairman was Lord Alexander of Weedon; followed by Bob Ayling (ex-CEO of British Airways); and the current chairman is Michael Payton (QC) Hon, chairman of Clyde & Co.
The original centre was located at Breams Buildings and consisted of six suites over 11,000ft2. It moved to 70 Fleet Street in 2004 with 11 suites over 25,000ft2. In 2011, the IDRC expanded into the building next door, creating a further three suites and is now using over 35,000ft2. The IDRC currently hosts up to 400 arbitrations and 400 mediations each year (as well as providing space for training courses, conferences, seminars, evening events and so on), with its largest available room capable of seating up to 100 people.
The centre enjoys the support of some of the major bodies in London concerned with dispute resolution, some of whom have offices at the IDRC (LCIA, Cedr, Jams International, Concordis International and ResoLex). Collaborators rather than competitors, the majority of their hearings are held at the IDRC.
Contributor Damian Hickman is Chief Executive Officer of the International Dispute Resolution Centre
Damian Hickman offers an insight into the challenges of running a busy international arbitration centre –from debugging services, extra-large entourages and last-minute visa requests
Writing in the Global Arbitration Review in May 2016, J William Rowley QC emphasised that ‘the importance of excellent, purpose-built arbitration hearing facilities cannot be over-estimated in the choice of… seat’.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
