*/
An international career in court work can be – and in my case has been – at least as much to do with luck as it has been to actual design. For those who agree that practically every aspect of a career at the Bar comes with significant risk, please read on.
As to the basis for presuming to offer my views to others on the subject: I am now admitted in, and practise across, 12 jurisdictions in addition to my original admission to the Bar of England and Wales. Most of those, but not all, are in the Caribbean region.
The practical implications of the COVID-19 situation on court sittings has been something of an ‘accelerator’ in terms of maximising the practice flexibility that a foothold in that number of jurisdictions brings. Gone (or at least postponed) are the wasted days in small airports.
None of the jurisdictions in which I am admitted outside of England and Wales required separate exams. All have procedural and substantive systems of law very recognisable for anyone with a training background of the Bar of England and Wales. Several have a relatively easy route of appeal to the Privy Council (for now, at least). A couple of these jurisdictions required nominal periods of ‘supervision’ (without any syllabus) pre-call. It will not surprise you to hear that there are worse places to wait out that period of not being on your feet in court than a Caribbean island.
Each of the jurisdictions in which I got admitted to the Bar reflected active work involvement. A couple of the admissions were relatively expensive in terms of court fees; I swallowed the cost as a way of staying on an existing case in order both to help the client and get my face known somewhere new. The so-called danger of falling outside of the mainstream career path by working largely outside of England and Wales pre-supposes both that such a path still exists and also that you should follow that if it does. Very different to how it was put to me when I left England in 2000, the decision is no longer a binary one. The scope for an overlapping (onshore/international) practice only continues to improve. I would take the risk again, but the risk is noticeable smaller now anyway.
Some of the overseas Bar admissions are a well-trodden path, especially by the London commercial Bar. To have real impact in the Caribbean region you will need more than those. One jurisdiction has a nationality requirement for full (as opposed to case-specific) admission. Another requires residence of a year pre-admission and has a case-specific admission possible only for Queen’s Counsel.
So, is some homework necessary? Yes. In my view, has it been worth the effort? Also, yes. Whether the last two decades in practice mostly overseas have provided me with variety of work and experience that I could have matched simply by not leaving England in the first place is obviously impossible ever to know. That said, and in an effort to try and help others, here are some of the things I would say to my younger self before I left the Northern Circuit and ventured forth:
An international career in court work can be – and in my case has been – at least as much to do with luck as it has been to actual design. For those who agree that practically every aspect of a career at the Bar comes with significant risk, please read on.
As to the basis for presuming to offer my views to others on the subject: I am now admitted in, and practise across, 12 jurisdictions in addition to my original admission to the Bar of England and Wales. Most of those, but not all, are in the Caribbean region.
The practical implications of the COVID-19 situation on court sittings has been something of an ‘accelerator’ in terms of maximising the practice flexibility that a foothold in that number of jurisdictions brings. Gone (or at least postponed) are the wasted days in small airports.
None of the jurisdictions in which I am admitted outside of England and Wales required separate exams. All have procedural and substantive systems of law very recognisable for anyone with a training background of the Bar of England and Wales. Several have a relatively easy route of appeal to the Privy Council (for now, at least). A couple of these jurisdictions required nominal periods of ‘supervision’ (without any syllabus) pre-call. It will not surprise you to hear that there are worse places to wait out that period of not being on your feet in court than a Caribbean island.
Each of the jurisdictions in which I got admitted to the Bar reflected active work involvement. A couple of the admissions were relatively expensive in terms of court fees; I swallowed the cost as a way of staying on an existing case in order both to help the client and get my face known somewhere new. The so-called danger of falling outside of the mainstream career path by working largely outside of England and Wales pre-supposes both that such a path still exists and also that you should follow that if it does. Very different to how it was put to me when I left England in 2000, the decision is no longer a binary one. The scope for an overlapping (onshore/international) practice only continues to improve. I would take the risk again, but the risk is noticeable smaller now anyway.
Some of the overseas Bar admissions are a well-trodden path, especially by the London commercial Bar. To have real impact in the Caribbean region you will need more than those. One jurisdiction has a nationality requirement for full (as opposed to case-specific) admission. Another requires residence of a year pre-admission and has a case-specific admission possible only for Queen’s Counsel.
So, is some homework necessary? Yes. In my view, has it been worth the effort? Also, yes. Whether the last two decades in practice mostly overseas have provided me with variety of work and experience that I could have matched simply by not leaving England in the first place is obviously impossible ever to know. That said, and in an effort to try and help others, here are some of the things I would say to my younger self before I left the Northern Circuit and ventured forth:
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By BSK Financial Planning
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control