*/
Lord Hoffmann has criticised the European Court of Human Rights for behaving like the US Supreme Court on human rights issues.
Delivering the annual Judicial Studies Board lecture in March, Lord Hoffmann reiterated his support for the text of the European Convention on Human Rights, and its embodiment in the Human Rights Act 1998.
However, he questioned the Court’s application of the “margin of appreciation” between universal human rights and the recognition that these are applied by the national courts. “In practice, the Court has not taken the doctrine of the margin of appreciation nearly far enough,” he said. “It has been unable to resist the temptation to aggrandise its jurisdiction and to impose uniform rules on Member States. It considers itself the equivalent of the Supreme Court of the United States, laying down a federal law of Europe.” While “the practical expression of concepts” may change over the years, the Court was not entitled to “introduce wholly new concepts, such as the protection of the environment, into an international treaty which makes no mention of them, simply because it would be more in accordance with the spirit of the times,” he said.
While the UK legal system was not “perfect”, Lord Hoffmann argued that “detailed decisions about how it could be improved should be made in London, either by our democratic institutions or by judicial bodies which, like the Supreme Court of the United States, are integral with our own society and respected as such”.
Delivering the annual Judicial Studies Board lecture in March, Lord Hoffmann reiterated his support for the text of the European Convention on Human Rights, and its embodiment in the Human Rights Act 1998.
However, he questioned the Court’s application of the “margin of appreciation” between universal human rights and the recognition that these are applied by the national courts. “In practice, the Court has not taken the doctrine of the margin of appreciation nearly far enough,” he said. “It has been unable to resist the temptation to aggrandise its jurisdiction and to impose uniform rules on Member States. It considers itself the equivalent of the Supreme Court of the United States, laying down a federal law of Europe.” While “the practical expression of concepts” may change over the years, the Court was not entitled to “introduce wholly new concepts, such as the protection of the environment, into an international treaty which makes no mention of them, simply because it would be more in accordance with the spirit of the times,” he said.
While the UK legal system was not “perfect”, Lord Hoffmann argued that “detailed decisions about how it could be improved should be made in London, either by our democratic institutions or by judicial bodies which, like the Supreme Court of the United States, are integral with our own society and respected as such”.
Lord Hoffmann has criticised the European Court of Human Rights for behaving like the US Supreme Court on human rights issues.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
