*/
A half-day of “non-attendance” on the first day of term has been announced by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) as a “reasonable and proportionate response to the conduct of the Ministry of Justice” and a “glimpse of the future if our profession is dismantled into non-existence”.
CBA Chair Nigel Lithman QC, who “as a matter of courtesy” had informed the Lord Chief Justice, Recorder of London, Common Serjeant and Director of Public Prosecutions, confirmed: “Many members of the criminal Bar intend to attend a series of meetings across the country on Monday 6 January 2014 so that they can discuss their futures. They will be ready to resume by 2pm.”
“It is not a decision that has been taken lightly,” he added, and it would be “a matter for each individual barrister to decide whether he or she will protest in this way”.
The Circuit Leaders and CBA have drafted a protocol (see www.criminalbar.com) to ensure “minimum inconvenience” to courts and clients. It emphasised that those in a case involving the young or vulnerable should attend court, and those concerned that their lay client’s liberty may be at risk should ensure that their professional client’s representative could attend “until such time as you will be present”.
A MoJ spokesperson said in response: “Barristers in VHCCs are well-rewarded. Around two-thirds receive fee incomes of over £100,000, and often well over that. Even after our changes they would continue to be generously paid – both for VHCCs and in advocates graduated fee scheme cases. We have consulted on two options for reducing wider advocacy fees – including a brand new model based on the CPS system specifically requested by barristers – eg the reduction in trial fees suggested were options of 8% or 11%. We are carefully considering the responses to the consultation on those options before reaching a final decision.
“Disruption to court schedules is unnecessary, and barristers choosing to do so inconvenience their clients and hardworking taxpayers.”
The ‘stay-away’ is the latest step in the CBA’s protest against fee cuts. It follows refusal to enter into new VHCC contracts and return of existing contracts under the 30% reduction in remuneration terms.
CBA Chair Nigel Lithman QC, who “as a matter of courtesy” had informed the Lord Chief Justice, Recorder of London, Common Serjeant and Director of Public Prosecutions, confirmed: “Many members of the criminal Bar intend to attend a series of meetings across the country on Monday 6 January 2014 so that they can discuss their futures. They will be ready to resume by 2pm.”
“It is not a decision that has been taken lightly,” he added, and it would be “a matter for each individual barrister to decide whether he or she will protest in this way”.
The Circuit Leaders and CBA have drafted a protocol (see www.criminalbar.com) to ensure “minimum inconvenience” to courts and clients. It emphasised that those in a case involving the young or vulnerable should attend court, and those concerned that their lay client’s liberty may be at risk should ensure that their professional client’s representative could attend “until such time as you will be present”.
A MoJ spokesperson said in response: “Barristers in VHCCs are well-rewarded. Around two-thirds receive fee incomes of over £100,000, and often well over that. Even after our changes they would continue to be generously paid – both for VHCCs and in advocates graduated fee scheme cases. We have consulted on two options for reducing wider advocacy fees – including a brand new model based on the CPS system specifically requested by barristers – eg the reduction in trial fees suggested were options of 8% or 11%. We are carefully considering the responses to the consultation on those options before reaching a final decision.
“Disruption to court schedules is unnecessary, and barristers choosing to do so inconvenience their clients and hardworking taxpayers.”
The ‘stay-away’ is the latest step in the CBA’s protest against fee cuts. It follows refusal to enter into new VHCC contracts and return of existing contracts under the 30% reduction in remuneration terms.
A half-day of “non-attendance” on the first day of term has been announced by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) as a “reasonable and proportionate response to the conduct of the Ministry of Justice” and a “glimpse of the future if our profession is dismantled into non-existence”.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
Why were some Caribbean nations given such dramatically different constitutional frameworks when they gained independence from the UK? Dr Leonardo Raznovich examines the controversial savings clause
