*/
A half-day of “non-attendance” on the first day of term has been announced by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) as a “reasonable and proportionate response to the conduct of the Ministry of Justice” and a “glimpse of the future if our profession is dismantled into non-existence”.
CBA Chair Nigel Lithman QC, who “as a matter of courtesy” had informed the Lord Chief Justice, Recorder of London, Common Serjeant and Director of Public Prosecutions, confirmed: “Many members of the criminal Bar intend to attend a series of meetings across the country on Monday 6 January 2014 so that they can discuss their futures. They will be ready to resume by 2pm.”
“It is not a decision that has been taken lightly,” he added, and it would be “a matter for each individual barrister to decide whether he or she will protest in this way”.
The Circuit Leaders and CBA have drafted a protocol (see www.criminalbar.com) to ensure “minimum inconvenience” to courts and clients. It emphasised that those in a case involving the young or vulnerable should attend court, and those concerned that their lay client’s liberty may be at risk should ensure that their professional client’s representative could attend “until such time as you will be present”.
A MoJ spokesperson said in response: “Barristers in VHCCs are well-rewarded. Around two-thirds receive fee incomes of over £100,000, and often well over that. Even after our changes they would continue to be generously paid – both for VHCCs and in advocates graduated fee scheme cases. We have consulted on two options for reducing wider advocacy fees – including a brand new model based on the CPS system specifically requested by barristers – eg the reduction in trial fees suggested were options of 8% or 11%. We are carefully considering the responses to the consultation on those options before reaching a final decision.
“Disruption to court schedules is unnecessary, and barristers choosing to do so inconvenience their clients and hardworking taxpayers.”
The ‘stay-away’ is the latest step in the CBA’s protest against fee cuts. It follows refusal to enter into new VHCC contracts and return of existing contracts under the 30% reduction in remuneration terms.
CBA Chair Nigel Lithman QC, who “as a matter of courtesy” had informed the Lord Chief Justice, Recorder of London, Common Serjeant and Director of Public Prosecutions, confirmed: “Many members of the criminal Bar intend to attend a series of meetings across the country on Monday 6 January 2014 so that they can discuss their futures. They will be ready to resume by 2pm.”
“It is not a decision that has been taken lightly,” he added, and it would be “a matter for each individual barrister to decide whether he or she will protest in this way”.
The Circuit Leaders and CBA have drafted a protocol (see www.criminalbar.com) to ensure “minimum inconvenience” to courts and clients. It emphasised that those in a case involving the young or vulnerable should attend court, and those concerned that their lay client’s liberty may be at risk should ensure that their professional client’s representative could attend “until such time as you will be present”.
A MoJ spokesperson said in response: “Barristers in VHCCs are well-rewarded. Around two-thirds receive fee incomes of over £100,000, and often well over that. Even after our changes they would continue to be generously paid – both for VHCCs and in advocates graduated fee scheme cases. We have consulted on two options for reducing wider advocacy fees – including a brand new model based on the CPS system specifically requested by barristers – eg the reduction in trial fees suggested were options of 8% or 11%. We are carefully considering the responses to the consultation on those options before reaching a final decision.
“Disruption to court schedules is unnecessary, and barristers choosing to do so inconvenience their clients and hardworking taxpayers.”
The ‘stay-away’ is the latest step in the CBA’s protest against fee cuts. It follows refusal to enter into new VHCC contracts and return of existing contracts under the 30% reduction in remuneration terms.
A half-day of “non-attendance” on the first day of term has been announced by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) as a “reasonable and proportionate response to the conduct of the Ministry of Justice” and a “glimpse of the future if our profession is dismantled into non-existence”.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
In an era of patient-centred care and growing concern over misconduct in medical settings, why do women still lack the right to choose women consultants for examination and treatment? Charles Davey investigates
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
