*/
Nigel Patrick talks through new Sentencing Council guidelines on allocation, offences taken into consideration and totality
Definitive guidelines have been published by the Sentencing Council on three overarching aspects of sentencing: allocation, offences taken into consideration (TICs) and totality.
The guidelines, which will come into force in June, aim to ensure that the principles in each of these areas of sentencing practice are applied consistently in courts in England and Wales.
Allocation
The allocation guideline aims to encourage a consistent approach to allocation decisions so that defendants are tried at the appropriate level. It brings a change in emphasis to the way in which magistrates approach assessing the strength of a case, moving away from taking the prosecution case at its highest. Instead, the guideline encourages the court to make a balanced assessment of the seriousness of the case taking into account both prosecution and defence representations.
TICs
The Sentencing Council has also produced a guideline for TICs to set out the general principles, procedure and approach and so bring clarity and consistency to this long-standing convention.
The guideline is not intended to bring about changes in sentencing practice other than where the application of the guideline might lead to greater consistency of approach; the types of sentence being passed and the prison population are not expected to be altered. Not all types of offence can be taken into consideration in a sentence and the guideline lists a number of exclusions.
Totality
The third guideline, on totality, has been produced to fulfil one of the Sentencing Council’s statutory duties under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (s 120(3)(b)).
The guideline aims to bring greater clarity and transparency to existing sentencing practice for multiple offences and increase consistency of the application of the totality principle. It is not intended to bring about any changes in practice.
Average custodial sentence lengths, and the proportion of offenders receiving the various types of sentence, are not expected to change as a result of the introduction of the guideline.
Consultation
Publication of the guidelines follows a three-month consultation period and the comments and feedback received were taken on board in the production of the definitive guidelines.
As with its other guidelines, the council recognises the need to ensure a consistency of approach across all the courts that will be using these guidelines, while being careful not to include material that would rarely or never be used in one or other court. For this reason, the Crown Court version of the guidelines will not include the allocation guideline and the version of the totality guideline for inclusion in the Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines (MCSG) will not include the specific application sections on extended sentences for public protection or indeterminate sentences, as magistrates cannot pass these sentences.
The definitive guidelines were published in a Crown Court version and as an update to the MCSG on 6 March 2012 and sent out to all courts, coming into force on 11 June 2012.
The new guidelines can be downloaded from the Sentencing Council’s site – www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk.
Nigel Patrick, senior policy advisor, the Sentencing Council
Allocation
The allocation guideline aims to encourage a consistent approach to allocation decisions so that defendants are tried at the appropriate level. It brings a change in emphasis to the way in which magistrates approach assessing the strength of a case, moving away from taking the prosecution case at its highest. Instead, the guideline encourages the court to make a balanced assessment of the seriousness of the case taking into account both prosecution and defence representations.
TICs
The Sentencing Council has also produced a guideline for TICs to set out the general principles, procedure and approach and so bring clarity and consistency to this long-standing convention.
The guideline is not intended to bring about changes in sentencing practice other than where the application of the guideline might lead to greater consistency of approach; the types of sentence being passed and the prison population are not expected to be altered. Not all types of offence can be taken into consideration in a sentence and the guideline lists a number of exclusions.
Totality
The third guideline, on totality, has been produced to fulfil one of the Sentencing Council’s statutory duties under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (s 120(3)(b)).
The guideline aims to bring greater clarity and transparency to existing sentencing practice for multiple offences and increase consistency of the application of the totality principle. It is not intended to bring about any changes in practice.
Average custodial sentence lengths, and the proportion of offenders receiving the various types of sentence, are not expected to change as a result of the introduction of the guideline.
Consultation
Publication of the guidelines follows a three-month consultation period and the comments and feedback received were taken on board in the production of the definitive guidelines.
As with its other guidelines, the council recognises the need to ensure a consistency of approach across all the courts that will be using these guidelines, while being careful not to include material that would rarely or never be used in one or other court. For this reason, the Crown Court version of the guidelines will not include the allocation guideline and the version of the totality guideline for inclusion in the Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines (MCSG) will not include the specific application sections on extended sentences for public protection or indeterminate sentences, as magistrates cannot pass these sentences.
The definitive guidelines were published in a Crown Court version and as an update to the MCSG on 6 March 2012 and sent out to all courts, coming into force on 11 June 2012.
The new guidelines can be downloaded from the Sentencing Council’s site – www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk.
Nigel Patrick, senior policy advisor, the Sentencing Council
Nigel Patrick talks through new Sentencing Council guidelines on allocation, offences taken into consideration and totality
Definitive guidelines have been published by the Sentencing Council on three overarching aspects of sentencing: allocation, offences taken into consideration (TICs) and totality.
The guidelines, which will come into force in June, aim to ensure that the principles in each of these areas of sentencing practice are applied consistently in courts in England and Wales.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
