*/
Elizabeth Alabaster outlines the work of the Access to Justice Foundation and urges lawyers to up their efforts to seek pro bono costs
The Access to Justice Foundation was established in 2008 by the Bar Council, Chartered Institute of Legal Executives and the Law Society.
It helps to provide free legal advice to those most in need by raising and distributing funds to advice agencies throughout the country. The foundation has provided financial support to numerous important strategic projects and charitable organisations including AdviceUK, the Bar Pro Bono Unit and the Law Centres Federation.
With cuts to the provision of legal aid, we are all aware that there is more pressure than ever on both the legal profession and the pro bono sector. While the generosity of the Bar has helped ensure a steady flow of expertise and specialist advice in Bar Pro Bono Unit cases, the pro bono sector has ever-growing funding needs.
Following their introduction in 2008, pro bono costs orders totalling approximately £380,000 have been awarded. You can help to increase this amount by ensuring that you record any time spent on a case pro bono, and seek pro bono costs for the work you do.
Pro bono costs
Pro bono costs are just like ordinary costs but where one of the parties has had free legal advice. If a civil case is won with pro bono help, pro bono costs can be ordered by the county court, High Court, Court of Appeal Civil Division and Supreme Court, or be included in settlements. The costs cover any period when free representation was provided and even if only one of the lawyers acted for free. Unpaid pro bono costs can be enforced like a normal costs award, either by the winning party or by the Access to Justice Foundation itself.
The procedure for seeking an order for pro bono costs is the same as seeking a normal costs order. At the successful conclusion of an application, trial, or appeal, the pro bono lawyer or litigant in person should ask the judge to order costs against the losing party. Under s 194 of the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007), pro bono costs must be paid to the Access to Justice Foundation.
Section 194 of LSA 2007 is supplemented by CPR 44.3C(2), which sets out how the court may determine the amount of pro bono costs to be awarded. That amount is based on what a paying client would recover. Paragraph 10A of the Costs Practice Direction provides that the general rule contained in para 13.2 applies to pro bono cases, namely that the court should make a summary assessment of the costs unless there is good reason not to do so.
We need your help to ensure pro bono costs are requested wherever possible to secure valuable funds for the pro bono sector. When you represent a client pro bono, don’t let the losing party get away without seeking a pro bono costs order under CPR 46.7. When pro bono costs are agreed, please ensure the Foundation is notified at costs@atjf.org.uk and send us a copy of the orders.
When acting pro bono, don’t forget:
If you would like more information, please see the ‘Full guidance and FAQs’ on our website. For hard copies of any of our materials, please email enquiries@atjf.org.uk. ●
Contributor Elizabeth Alabaster is a volunteer at the Access to Justice Foundation
Susan’s story
Susan was in her 60s and suffering from arthritis and various other age-related health problems. She was becoming increasingly vulnerable and feeling alienated from her community. Susan was unable to prepare food, get dressed, bathe herself or get out and about without help. The Avon & Bristol Law Centre referred her to Bristol City Council Social Services for an assessment. However, the support offered fell well below the minimum required, allowing only a 15-minute visit every morning. The Law Centre used relevant legislation to successfully argue that Susan needed at least double the support initially offered. As a result, Susan secured the support she needed.
This case study was provided by Avon & Bristol Law Centre, which received funding of £3,000 in 2014.
It helps to provide free legal advice to those most in need by raising and distributing funds to advice agencies throughout the country. The foundation has provided financial support to numerous important strategic projects and charitable organisations including AdviceUK, the Bar Pro Bono Unit and the Law Centres Federation.
With cuts to the provision of legal aid, we are all aware that there is more pressure than ever on both the legal profession and the pro bono sector. While the generosity of the Bar has helped ensure a steady flow of expertise and specialist advice in Bar Pro Bono Unit cases, the pro bono sector has ever-growing funding needs.
Following their introduction in 2008, pro bono costs orders totalling approximately £380,000 have been awarded. You can help to increase this amount by ensuring that you record any time spent on a case pro bono, and seek pro bono costs for the work you do.
Pro bono costs
Pro bono costs are just like ordinary costs but where one of the parties has had free legal advice. If a civil case is won with pro bono help, pro bono costs can be ordered by the county court, High Court, Court of Appeal Civil Division and Supreme Court, or be included in settlements. The costs cover any period when free representation was provided and even if only one of the lawyers acted for free. Unpaid pro bono costs can be enforced like a normal costs award, either by the winning party or by the Access to Justice Foundation itself.
The procedure for seeking an order for pro bono costs is the same as seeking a normal costs order. At the successful conclusion of an application, trial, or appeal, the pro bono lawyer or litigant in person should ask the judge to order costs against the losing party. Under s 194 of the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007), pro bono costs must be paid to the Access to Justice Foundation.
Section 194 of LSA 2007 is supplemented by CPR 44.3C(2), which sets out how the court may determine the amount of pro bono costs to be awarded. That amount is based on what a paying client would recover. Paragraph 10A of the Costs Practice Direction provides that the general rule contained in para 13.2 applies to pro bono cases, namely that the court should make a summary assessment of the costs unless there is good reason not to do so.
We need your help to ensure pro bono costs are requested wherever possible to secure valuable funds for the pro bono sector. When you represent a client pro bono, don’t let the losing party get away without seeking a pro bono costs order under CPR 46.7. When pro bono costs are agreed, please ensure the Foundation is notified at costs@atjf.org.uk and send us a copy of the orders.
When acting pro bono, don’t forget:
If you would like more information, please see the ‘Full guidance and FAQs’ on our website. For hard copies of any of our materials, please email enquiries@atjf.org.uk. ●
Contributor Elizabeth Alabaster is a volunteer at the Access to Justice Foundation
Susan’s story
Susan was in her 60s and suffering from arthritis and various other age-related health problems. She was becoming increasingly vulnerable and feeling alienated from her community. Susan was unable to prepare food, get dressed, bathe herself or get out and about without help. The Avon & Bristol Law Centre referred her to Bristol City Council Social Services for an assessment. However, the support offered fell well below the minimum required, allowing only a 15-minute visit every morning. The Law Centre used relevant legislation to successfully argue that Susan needed at least double the support initially offered. As a result, Susan secured the support she needed.
This case study was provided by Avon & Bristol Law Centre, which received funding of £3,000 in 2014.
Elizabeth Alabaster outlines the work of the Access to Justice Foundation and urges lawyers to up their efforts to seek pro bono costs
The Access to Justice Foundation was established in 2008 by the Bar Council, Chartered Institute of Legal Executives and the Law Society.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
