*/
The Law Reform Committee wants to know which areas of law reform it should consider on behalf of the Bar, say Dan Stacey and Eleena Misra
The Law Reform Committee of the Bar Council (“LRC”) was established in 1946 with terms of reference to develop and consider proposals for law reform.
Its work stems from the Bar Council’s own stated objectives of representing the Bar as a modern and forward looking profession and conducting research and promoting the Bar’s views on matters affecting the administration of justice, including substantive law reform.
Its primary purpose – then and now – is to submit views to the government and others where appropriate. That usually comprises responding to government consultations, the Law Commission, the EU and other bodies by the provision of written submissions drafted by members of the LRC with particular expertise in the area.
The LRC has a long tradition of commitment to reform of the law. At its first meeting, in November 1946, those attending included Gerald Gardiner KC who went on to become one of the great reforming Lord Chancellors. In 1949 it was minuted that there should be a uniform limitation period in respect of all claims for personal injury, contract and tort “thus rendering them more easily understood and remembered by both lawyers and laymen” (a reform which was subsequently recommended by the Law Commission nearly 50 years later).
The Final Report of the Denning Divorce Committee was discussed by the LRC. The future Lords Diplock and Donaldson submitted a paper on Civil Aviation. In the 1950s, counsel who had appeared in R v Montagu (1884) 49 JP 55 were invited to provide their views to a meeting of the LRC on what the decision had said about the scope of the right of the police to enter the property of accused persons.
Topics such as public interest immunity and pre-trial publicity in criminal trials also appear in the minutes of past meetings.
In the last ten years, the LRC has been chaired by two people who went on to the High Court Bench (Mr Justice Langstaff and Mr Justice Foskett), as well as Frank Burton QC and the current chairman, Stephen Worthington QC.
As presently constituted, the LRC meets monthly and has a membership made up of barristers specialising in a broad range of areas of law to provide strength in depth in responding to consultations. It has 27 members specialising in all areas of practice at the Bar (criminal, family, commercial, employment law etc) which can provide representations on a wide range of matters.
It has always been assisted by those who, although not members of the LRC, are recognised specialists in an area and can give of their time to a response paper. That is usually by way of recommendation or known expertise in an area. The LRC also has close connections with the Specialist Bar Associations and works with them where appropriate in respect of consultations – with the representations sometimes being jointly submitted.
There is also an annual essay competition and lecture at which the annual essay prize is awarded. Copies of winning essays have been sent to the Law Commission in the past if they are of particular merit.
In 2009 the LRC was busy, responding to 31 consultations on matters ranging from the national minimum wage to consumer remedies for faulty goods and the admissibility of expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales.
In 2010 the LRC has already submitted eight consultation papers, on immigration law, the role of the consumer advocate, mortgagees power of sale and intestacy, amongst other topics. The new Coalition government and the numerous Bills proposed in the Queen’s Speech also promise to keep the LRC busy for the foreseeable future.
The Law Commission has recently invited the LRC to submit to it specific proposals for law reform (for its 11th programme of law reform for submission to the Lord Chancellor next year). The LRC wants to canvas the profession for its views on areas of law which the LRC should consider on behalf of the Bar. The LRC would be very grateful if readers could respond to the questionnaire (see below). The questionnaire is also available on the Bar Council website at http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/lrc/. Readers are invited to submit written responses if they prefer (please send your responses to the freepost address given below).
Dan Stacey, barrister, Halisham Chambers and Eleena Misra, barrister, Littleton Chambers are members of the Law Reform Committee
The Law Reform Committee of the Bar Council (“LRC”) was established in 1946 with terms of reference to develop and consider proposals for law reform.
Its work stems from the Bar Council’s own stated objectives of representing the Bar as a modern and forward looking profession and conducting research and promoting the Bar’s views on matters affecting the administration of justice, including substantive law reform.
Its primary purpose – then and now – is to submit views to the government and others where appropriate. That usually comprises responding to government consultations, the Law Commission, the EU and other bodies by the provision of written submissions drafted by members of the LRC with particular expertise in the area.
The LRC has a long tradition of commitment to reform of the law. At its first meeting, in November 1946, those attending included Gerald Gardiner KC who went on to become one of the great reforming Lord Chancellors. In 1949 it was minuted that there should be a uniform limitation period in respect of all claims for personal injury, contract and tort “thus rendering them more easily understood and remembered by both lawyers and laymen” (a reform which was subsequently recommended by the Law Commission nearly 50 years later).
The Final Report of the Denning Divorce Committee was discussed by the LRC. The future Lords Diplock and Donaldson submitted a paper on Civil Aviation. In the 1950s, counsel who had appeared in R v Montagu (1884) 49 JP 55 were invited to provide their views to a meeting of the LRC on what the decision had said about the scope of the right of the police to enter the property of accused persons.
Topics such as public interest immunity and pre-trial publicity in criminal trials also appear in the minutes of past meetings.
In the last ten years, the LRC has been chaired by two people who went on to the High Court Bench (Mr Justice Langstaff and Mr Justice Foskett), as well as Frank Burton QC and the current chairman, Stephen Worthington QC.
As presently constituted, the LRC meets monthly and has a membership made up of barristers specialising in a broad range of areas of law to provide strength in depth in responding to consultations. It has 27 members specialising in all areas of practice at the Bar (criminal, family, commercial, employment law etc) which can provide representations on a wide range of matters.
It has always been assisted by those who, although not members of the LRC, are recognised specialists in an area and can give of their time to a response paper. That is usually by way of recommendation or known expertise in an area. The LRC also has close connections with the Specialist Bar Associations and works with them where appropriate in respect of consultations – with the representations sometimes being jointly submitted.
There is also an annual essay competition and lecture at which the annual essay prize is awarded. Copies of winning essays have been sent to the Law Commission in the past if they are of particular merit.
In 2009 the LRC was busy, responding to 31 consultations on matters ranging from the national minimum wage to consumer remedies for faulty goods and the admissibility of expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales.
In 2010 the LRC has already submitted eight consultation papers, on immigration law, the role of the consumer advocate, mortgagees power of sale and intestacy, amongst other topics. The new Coalition government and the numerous Bills proposed in the Queen’s Speech also promise to keep the LRC busy for the foreseeable future.
The Law Commission has recently invited the LRC to submit to it specific proposals for law reform (for its 11th programme of law reform for submission to the Lord Chancellor next year). The LRC wants to canvas the profession for its views on areas of law which the LRC should consider on behalf of the Bar. The LRC would be very grateful if readers could respond to the questionnaire (see below). The questionnaire is also available on the Bar Council website at http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/lrc/. Readers are invited to submit written responses if they prefer (please send your responses to the freepost address given below).
Dan Stacey, barrister, Halisham Chambers and Eleena Misra, barrister, Littleton Chambers are members of the Law Reform Committee
The Law Reform Committee wants to know which areas of law reform it should consider on behalf of the Bar, say Dan Stacey and Eleena Misra
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
