*/
From 2012, chambers will be required both to set up and contribute to a “qualifying pension arrangement” for clerical and administrative staff. Careful preparation will prevent an adversely negative impact on chambers’ budgets, advises Neill Millard.
For over a year, the Bar Council has been engaging with barristers to introduce “ProcureCos”, the model procurement company which will allow sets of chambers to contract directly with those who purchase legal services. It is anticipated that in the future chambers will need to become more corporate and to offer an enhanced and robust service that will survive any future due diligence requirements that Government may introduce.
The worst effects of this may be that many chambers suffer a reduction in their income, a reduced ability to attract and retain high quality clerical and administration staff and increased competition from other sets of chambers for each piece of work. However many sets of chambers are taking a more resilient and adaptable approach to change and looking to be more robust and positive.
The future: employee benefits for clerks and admin staff
Many clerking and administrative staff are considering their positions in view of the likely changes. They wish to ensure that they receive the most attractive package in order to safeguard their future. A competitive and extensive employee benefits package including pensions, life cover and income protection are seen as an important part of the overall package.
In recent months, chambers have begun to review their current employee benefits’ packages to ensure that they are competitive both in cost and provide the required level of benefits to staff. This situation will be exacerbated by the fact that from 2012, on a phased basis, employers will be required both to set up and contribute to, a “qualifying pension arrangement” for their employees, in accordance with the Government’s plans for “Auto-Enrolment”. This is a considerable advance on the previously introduced “Stakeholder” schemes. It will actually require pension contributions to be made, rather than merely for a scheme to be set up. This could be considered almost as another tax but if well prepared for in advance it should not prove too much of a shock to the budgets of chambers, and there are some tax relief benefits for employers.
Getting prepared
It is possible for a number of insurers to agree a package of employee benefits suitable for chambers. This include Group Pensions, suitable to satisfy the Auto-Enrolment requirements, with Group Risk Schemes (Group Life Assurance and Group Income Protection) currently being finalised.
Scottish Widows, with whom the authors have worked, comments: “Although the legislation is not likely to affect the majority of employers until 2013 and 2014, now is the time to start making preparations for the changes, as it is likely that there will be a financial impact on your clients’ businesses.
“There are steps employers can take now to minimise this impact. For example: increasing the existing qualifying scheme membership over the next few years will help avoid a sudden increase in costs. This also has the advantage that the employer can promote the benefits of joining the pension scheme with a positive message, rather than communicating with staff that they will be auto-enrolled, which could be viewed negatively.
Salary exchange can reduce costs by deducting the employee’s contribution from their salary before tax and National Insurance. This saves on National Insurance Contributions for both the employee and employer, allowing a higher contribution to the pension at no extra cost to either.”
Whilst this article is for general guidance only, we believe chambers should select the required benefits from an “off the shelf” package, which in turn will lead to simpler, faster, more efficient and cost-effective implementation.
Neil Millard, Director, Cavanagh Wealth Management.
For further information please contact the Corporate Team on 0844 264 0329 or e-mail barcouncil@cavanagh.co.uk
Pension scheme auto-enrolment
What is it?
The Pensions Act 2008 introduced legislation which is intended to make employers responsible for ensuring that all employees contribute to their retirement income needs through the establishment of in-work pension schemes. The legislation states that “… the employer must make prescribed arrangements by which the jobholder becomes an active member of an automatic enrolment scheme.” Employers must make available and enrol their employees into a pension scheme to which both they and the employee must contribute.
The intention is that these pension schemes are set up either by the employers themselves or via a scheme to be set up by the Government, known as the National Employment Savings Trust (“NEST”).
The main proposals
From 2012, initially all large employers and eventually all employers regardless of their size will be required to auto-enrol their qualifying employees into a suitable pension scheme. The largest employers will be required to comply immediately and a programme to include small employers will be rolled out from October 2012 to September 2016. This is known as “staging” and employers will be given 12 months’ notice by the Pensions Regulator of their requirement to comply. Companies with a single director and no other employees will be exempt.
Qualifying employees will be those who have been employed for at least three months, are aged over 22 and with earnings at the level of the personal tax allowance or higher.
A suitable scheme (one that passes the scheme quality test) will need to be in place or NEST could be used. Employers will need to certify each year that their scheme meets the minimum necessary standards.
From October 2012 the contributions level will be two per cent of qualifying earnings (with at least one per cent from the employer). In October 2016, this will increase to five per cent (with at least two per cent from the employer) and in October 2017, this will increase to eight per cent (with at least three per cent from the employer).
The worst effects of this may be that many chambers suffer a reduction in their income, a reduced ability to attract and retain high quality clerical and administration staff and increased competition from other sets of chambers for each piece of work. However many sets of chambers are taking a more resilient and adaptable approach to change and looking to be more robust and positive.
The future: employee benefits for clerks and admin staff
Many clerking and administrative staff are considering their positions in view of the likely changes. They wish to ensure that they receive the most attractive package in order to safeguard their future. A competitive and extensive employee benefits package including pensions, life cover and income protection are seen as an important part of the overall package.
In recent months, chambers have begun to review their current employee benefits’ packages to ensure that they are competitive both in cost and provide the required level of benefits to staff. This situation will be exacerbated by the fact that from 2012, on a phased basis, employers will be required both to set up and contribute to, a “qualifying pension arrangement” for their employees, in accordance with the Government’s plans for “Auto-Enrolment”. This is a considerable advance on the previously introduced “Stakeholder” schemes. It will actually require pension contributions to be made, rather than merely for a scheme to be set up. This could be considered almost as another tax but if well prepared for in advance it should not prove too much of a shock to the budgets of chambers, and there are some tax relief benefits for employers.
Getting prepared
It is possible for a number of insurers to agree a package of employee benefits suitable for chambers. This include Group Pensions, suitable to satisfy the Auto-Enrolment requirements, with Group Risk Schemes (Group Life Assurance and Group Income Protection) currently being finalised.
Scottish Widows, with whom the authors have worked, comments: “Although the legislation is not likely to affect the majority of employers until 2013 and 2014, now is the time to start making preparations for the changes, as it is likely that there will be a financial impact on your clients’ businesses.
“There are steps employers can take now to minimise this impact. For example: increasing the existing qualifying scheme membership over the next few years will help avoid a sudden increase in costs. This also has the advantage that the employer can promote the benefits of joining the pension scheme with a positive message, rather than communicating with staff that they will be auto-enrolled, which could be viewed negatively.
Salary exchange can reduce costs by deducting the employee’s contribution from their salary before tax and National Insurance. This saves on National Insurance Contributions for both the employee and employer, allowing a higher contribution to the pension at no extra cost to either.”
Whilst this article is for general guidance only, we believe chambers should select the required benefits from an “off the shelf” package, which in turn will lead to simpler, faster, more efficient and cost-effective implementation.
Neil Millard, Director, Cavanagh Wealth Management.
For further information please contact the Corporate Team on 0844 264 0329 or e-mail barcouncil@cavanagh.co.uk
Pension scheme auto-enrolment
What is it?
The Pensions Act 2008 introduced legislation which is intended to make employers responsible for ensuring that all employees contribute to their retirement income needs through the establishment of in-work pension schemes. The legislation states that “… the employer must make prescribed arrangements by which the jobholder becomes an active member of an automatic enrolment scheme.” Employers must make available and enrol their employees into a pension scheme to which both they and the employee must contribute.
The intention is that these pension schemes are set up either by the employers themselves or via a scheme to be set up by the Government, known as the National Employment Savings Trust (“NEST”).
The main proposals
From 2012, initially all large employers and eventually all employers regardless of their size will be required to auto-enrol their qualifying employees into a suitable pension scheme. The largest employers will be required to comply immediately and a programme to include small employers will be rolled out from October 2012 to September 2016. This is known as “staging” and employers will be given 12 months’ notice by the Pensions Regulator of their requirement to comply. Companies with a single director and no other employees will be exempt.
Qualifying employees will be those who have been employed for at least three months, are aged over 22 and with earnings at the level of the personal tax allowance or higher.
A suitable scheme (one that passes the scheme quality test) will need to be in place or NEST could be used. Employers will need to certify each year that their scheme meets the minimum necessary standards.
From October 2012 the contributions level will be two per cent of qualifying earnings (with at least one per cent from the employer). In October 2016, this will increase to five per cent (with at least two per cent from the employer) and in October 2017, this will increase to eight per cent (with at least three per cent from the employer).
From 2012, chambers will be required both to set up and contribute to a “qualifying pension arrangement” for clerical and administrative staff. Careful preparation will prevent an adversely negative impact on chambers’ budgets, advises Neill Millard.
For over a year, the Bar Council has been engaging with barristers to introduce “ProcureCos”, the model procurement company which will allow sets of chambers to contract directly with those who purchase legal services. It is anticipated that in the future chambers will need to become more corporate and to offer an enhanced and robust service that will survive any future due diligence requirements that Government may introduce.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
At least not that way, says Richard Paige
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
