*/
The Bar Standards Board has laid out plans for new statutory powers to step into “failing chambers, companies and partnerships” to enable it to protect clients where something has gone “seriously wrong”.
In a consultation paper launched last month, it argued that it should have statutory powers to intervene and take control of client files in instances of failure to comply with regulatory requirements, dishonesty and insolvency.
The powers, similar to those already held by the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, will enable it to obtain alternative representation for clients and secure any papers and assets that belong to them.
The consultation also proposes powers to establish and require contributions to a compensation fund. While not needed at present as chambers do not hold client money, the BSB said the situation may change “as the market develops and risks change”.
The BSB’s Director of Regulatory Policy, Ewen Macleod, said “These are powers that would be used very rarely, but we think that, in the event something goes awry, all clients should benefit from the same safeguards.”
He added: “Other regulators already have similar controls so we want to ensure there are no holes in the safety net for consumers.”
The consultation followed the BSB’s application to the Legal Services Board to become a regulator of alternative business structures.
In its application, it said it would provide “lighter weight and less costly” regulation compared to other bodies.
The BSB said it is “keen to regulate a range of entities to ensure that the market in legal services is strong and vibrant, with a variety of models, which allow the profession to innovate”.
But it stated there is “little advantage” in establishing a regime which simply replicates that of the SRA or others.
Rather, it said it aimed to operate as a “specialist entity regulator” for those whose permitted range of services is broadly the same as those permitted to the self-employed Bar and whose risks and regulatory requirements are similar.”
The Bar Standards Board has laid out plans for new statutory powers to step into “failing chambers, companies and partnerships” to enable it to protect clients where something has gone “seriously wrong”.
In a consultation paper launched last month, it argued that it should have statutory powers to intervene and take control of client files in instances of failure to comply with regulatory requirements, dishonesty and insolvency.
The powers, similar to those already held by the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, will enable it to obtain alternative representation for clients and secure any papers and assets that belong to them.
The consultation also proposes powers to establish and require contributions to a compensation fund. While not needed at present as chambers do not hold client money, the BSB said the situation may change “as the market develops and risks change”.
The BSB’s Director of Regulatory Policy, Ewen Macleod, said “These are powers that would be used very rarely, but we think that, in the event something goes awry, all clients should benefit from the same safeguards.”
He added: “Other regulators already have similar controls so we want to ensure there are no holes in the safety net for consumers.”
The consultation followed the BSB’s application to the Legal Services Board to become a regulator of alternative business structures.
In its application, it said it would provide “lighter weight and less costly” regulation compared to other bodies.
The BSB said it is “keen to regulate a range of entities to ensure that the market in legal services is strong and vibrant, with a variety of models, which allow the profession to innovate”.
But it stated there is “little advantage” in establishing a regime which simply replicates that of the SRA or others.
Rather, it said it aimed to operate as a “specialist entity regulator” for those whose permitted range of services is broadly the same as those permitted to the self-employed Bar and whose risks and regulatory requirements are similar.”
The Bar Council is ready to support a turn to the efficiencies that will make a difference
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
Ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC continues his series explaining the impact on barristers. In part 2, a worked example shows the specific practicalities of adapting to the new system
Resolution of the criminal justice crisis does not lie in reheating old ideas that have been roundly rejected before, say Ed Vickers KC, Faras Baloch and Katie Bacon
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar