*/
The Bar Standards Board has laid out plans for new statutory powers to step into “failing chambers, companies and partnerships” to enable it to protect clients where something has gone “seriously wrong”.
In a consultation paper launched last month, it argued that it should have statutory powers to intervene and take control of client files in instances of failure to comply with regulatory requirements, dishonesty and insolvency.
The powers, similar to those already held by the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, will enable it to obtain alternative representation for clients and secure any papers and assets that belong to them.
The consultation also proposes powers to establish and require contributions to a compensation fund. While not needed at present as chambers do not hold client money, the BSB said the situation may change “as the market develops and risks change”.
The BSB’s Director of Regulatory Policy, Ewen Macleod, said “These are powers that would be used very rarely, but we think that, in the event something goes awry, all clients should benefit from the same safeguards.”
He added: “Other regulators already have similar controls so we want to ensure there are no holes in the safety net for consumers.”
The consultation followed the BSB’s application to the Legal Services Board to become a regulator of alternative business structures.
In its application, it said it would provide “lighter weight and less costly” regulation compared to other bodies.
The BSB said it is “keen to regulate a range of entities to ensure that the market in legal services is strong and vibrant, with a variety of models, which allow the profession to innovate”.
But it stated there is “little advantage” in establishing a regime which simply replicates that of the SRA or others.
Rather, it said it aimed to operate as a “specialist entity regulator” for those whose permitted range of services is broadly the same as those permitted to the self-employed Bar and whose risks and regulatory requirements are similar.”
The Bar Standards Board has laid out plans for new statutory powers to step into “failing chambers, companies and partnerships” to enable it to protect clients where something has gone “seriously wrong”.
In a consultation paper launched last month, it argued that it should have statutory powers to intervene and take control of client files in instances of failure to comply with regulatory requirements, dishonesty and insolvency.
The powers, similar to those already held by the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, will enable it to obtain alternative representation for clients and secure any papers and assets that belong to them.
The consultation also proposes powers to establish and require contributions to a compensation fund. While not needed at present as chambers do not hold client money, the BSB said the situation may change “as the market develops and risks change”.
The BSB’s Director of Regulatory Policy, Ewen Macleod, said “These are powers that would be used very rarely, but we think that, in the event something goes awry, all clients should benefit from the same safeguards.”
He added: “Other regulators already have similar controls so we want to ensure there are no holes in the safety net for consumers.”
The consultation followed the BSB’s application to the Legal Services Board to become a regulator of alternative business structures.
In its application, it said it would provide “lighter weight and less costly” regulation compared to other bodies.
The BSB said it is “keen to regulate a range of entities to ensure that the market in legal services is strong and vibrant, with a variety of models, which allow the profession to innovate”.
But it stated there is “little advantage” in establishing a regime which simply replicates that of the SRA or others.
Rather, it said it aimed to operate as a “specialist entity regulator” for those whose permitted range of services is broadly the same as those permitted to the self-employed Bar and whose risks and regulatory requirements are similar.”
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
With gender earnings inequality at the Bar getting worse, not better, Judith Ayling KC discusses concrete solutions and collective action – including steps taken by the Personal Injuries Bar Association
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse