*/
The Role of the Circuit Courts in the Formation of United States Law in the Early Republic
Author: His Honour David Lynch
Publisher: Hart Publishing (2018)
ISBN: 9781509910854
All proceeds are donated to the Bar Benevolent Fund
The author of this scholarly work requires little by way of introduction. A Bencher of Middle Temple and Honorary Fellow and Visiting Research Fellow of Liverpool John Moores University, he has been the Remembrancer for the Northern Circuit for many years and as such compiled his Northern Circuit Directory (1876-2004) which he updated in 2015.
This current work deals with a vitally important period of US legal history and the crucial role of the circuit courts in the development of a uniform system of federal law across the nation. By reference to the judgments, opinions and letters of four Associate Justices (Washington, Livingston, Story and Thompson) as presiding judges of their respective circuit courts in the period 1801-1835 and with separate sections of his work devoted to the work of each of them, the author demonstrates how federal law developed from the lower courts upwards rather than from the Supreme Court downwards.
The justices went out on circuit with no specific guidance as to the approach they should adopt to achieve the uniform system of federal law and procedure essential to the stability of the social and economic needs of the new Republic. There were few Supreme Court opinions and hardly any federal statutes to guide them. They sought uniformity in each other’s circuit opinions and those opinions were often derived from Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England. Consistency was achieved by exchanges of ideas when they were together in Washington and by writing to each other on circuit.
This laudable and detailed investigation into the work of the four prominent justices of the United States circuit courts establishes those courts as key to the development of the federal court system in the Early Republic and how the law was shaped in those early years through the depth of its inquiry into the legal issues facing the justices on circuit.
Based upon his research the author concludes that by 1835 these four justices had found American law a skeleton upon which to build and their work in the federal courts at the very beginning of the federal court experiment and later in their duties in the Supreme Court left a fully formed body of federal law to which later generations have added.
As a guide to a critical period of US history, legal as well as economic and political, I commend this book as compulsory reading.
Reviewer: David Steer QC DL, Leader of the Northern Circuit 2002-04
The author of this scholarly work requires little by way of introduction. A Bencher of Middle Temple and Honorary Fellow and Visiting Research Fellow of Liverpool John Moores University, he has been the Remembrancer for the Northern Circuit for many years and as such compiled his Northern Circuit Directory (1876-2004) which he updated in 2015.
This current work deals with a vitally important period of US legal history and the crucial role of the circuit courts in the development of a uniform system of federal law across the nation. By reference to the judgments, opinions and letters of four Associate Justices (Washington, Livingston, Story and Thompson) as presiding judges of their respective circuit courts in the period 1801-1835 and with separate sections of his work devoted to the work of each of them, the author demonstrates how federal law developed from the lower courts upwards rather than from the Supreme Court downwards.
The justices went out on circuit with no specific guidance as to the approach they should adopt to achieve the uniform system of federal law and procedure essential to the stability of the social and economic needs of the new Republic. There were few Supreme Court opinions and hardly any federal statutes to guide them. They sought uniformity in each other’s circuit opinions and those opinions were often derived from Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England. Consistency was achieved by exchanges of ideas when they were together in Washington and by writing to each other on circuit.
This laudable and detailed investigation into the work of the four prominent justices of the United States circuit courts establishes those courts as key to the development of the federal court system in the Early Republic and how the law was shaped in those early years through the depth of its inquiry into the legal issues facing the justices on circuit.
Based upon his research the author concludes that by 1835 these four justices had found American law a skeleton upon which to build and their work in the federal courts at the very beginning of the federal court experiment and later in their duties in the Supreme Court left a fully formed body of federal law to which later generations have added.
As a guide to a critical period of US history, legal as well as economic and political, I commend this book as compulsory reading.
Reviewer: David Steer QC DL, Leader of the Northern Circuit 2002-04
The Role of the Circuit Courts in the Formation of United States Law in the Early Republic
Author: His Honour David Lynch
Publisher: Hart Publishing (2018)
ISBN: 9781509910854
All proceeds are donated to the Bar Benevolent Fund
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC