*/
The Common Freedom of the People
Author: Michael Braddick
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 9780198803232
John Lilburne (1614-1657) was a sometime Leveller, political activist and litigant, who during his short life was accused of treason four times and was put on trial for his life under both Charles I and Oliver Cromwell.
In the course of this extraordinary existence, he fought important legal battles for the right to remain silent, to have trials conducted in public and to be tried by a jury of his peers. The US Supreme Court cites him as being important in the making and framing of both the 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination and the 6th Amendment right to a fair trial. Of the eight pillars making up the present day ‘Rule of Law’ identified by Tom Bingham in his seminal summary of the common law, Lilburne arguably played at least a part in securing six.
Michael Braddick’s new ‘political life’ of Lilburne is the first for 60 years. Unlike its predecessors, it explores Lilburne’s thinking through the prism of modern sensibilities. Thus, Lilburne’s fight for our prevailing secular freedoms is juxtaposed with his now less relevant, awkward, religious fervour and with his ugly misogyny.
Lilburne’s fight for the legal freedoms that we now take for granted was not a dry academic one. Rather it was an extraordinary battle fought, from prison and the pillory, in the Star Chamber and the court and from exile. And it was a fight with real life or death consequences. Lilburne believed in juries because they saved him from execution on at least two occasions.
Braddick tells the story of Lilburne’s struggles expertly, fluently and well. Lilburne’s life was truly action-packed but Braddick resists the temptation to sensationalise. His analysis of the emergence of the right to avoid self incrimination from Lilburne’s refusal to take the Star Chamber ‘oath ex officio’ is compelling.
In addition to the obvious and continued relevance of these subject matters, lawyers will like this book for other reasons.
Braddick writes in short sentences. His narrative has a flowing, examination-in-chief style. Much of the book is set in legal London. It brings the judicial and penal infrastructure of the time alive with revealing glimpses of its main institutions. The Fleet, for example, was a prison run by private owners who built houses for the inmates within the grounds and then let them out at commercial rates. As long as the inmates were up to date with their rent, the warders were forbidden to enter the homes and prisoners could live a relatively normal comfortable domestic existence. How different to today’s HMP Bedford!
Braddick concludes his political life of Lilburne by reminding us that we are all likely to be ‘in his debt’ and that ‘rather than rebuke him for his failings we should honour him for his courage’. That reminder is a good reason for those of us in the law to read this important book.
Reviewer: Russell Harris QC, a Planning and Environment Silk and Special Advocate at Landmark Chambers
John Lilburne (1614-1657) was a sometime Leveller, political activist and litigant, who during his short life was accused of treason four times and was put on trial for his life under both Charles I and Oliver Cromwell.
In the course of this extraordinary existence, he fought important legal battles for the right to remain silent, to have trials conducted in public and to be tried by a jury of his peers. The US Supreme Court cites him as being important in the making and framing of both the 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination and the 6th Amendment right to a fair trial. Of the eight pillars making up the present day ‘Rule of Law’ identified by Tom Bingham in his seminal summary of the common law, Lilburne arguably played at least a part in securing six.
Michael Braddick’s new ‘political life’ of Lilburne is the first for 60 years. Unlike its predecessors, it explores Lilburne’s thinking through the prism of modern sensibilities. Thus, Lilburne’s fight for our prevailing secular freedoms is juxtaposed with his now less relevant, awkward, religious fervour and with his ugly misogyny.
Lilburne’s fight for the legal freedoms that we now take for granted was not a dry academic one. Rather it was an extraordinary battle fought, from prison and the pillory, in the Star Chamber and the court and from exile. And it was a fight with real life or death consequences. Lilburne believed in juries because they saved him from execution on at least two occasions.
Braddick tells the story of Lilburne’s struggles expertly, fluently and well. Lilburne’s life was truly action-packed but Braddick resists the temptation to sensationalise. His analysis of the emergence of the right to avoid self incrimination from Lilburne’s refusal to take the Star Chamber ‘oath ex officio’ is compelling.
In addition to the obvious and continued relevance of these subject matters, lawyers will like this book for other reasons.
Braddick writes in short sentences. His narrative has a flowing, examination-in-chief style. Much of the book is set in legal London. It brings the judicial and penal infrastructure of the time alive with revealing glimpses of its main institutions. The Fleet, for example, was a prison run by private owners who built houses for the inmates within the grounds and then let them out at commercial rates. As long as the inmates were up to date with their rent, the warders were forbidden to enter the homes and prisoners could live a relatively normal comfortable domestic existence. How different to today’s HMP Bedford!
Braddick concludes his political life of Lilburne by reminding us that we are all likely to be ‘in his debt’ and that ‘rather than rebuke him for his failings we should honour him for his courage’. That reminder is a good reason for those of us in the law to read this important book.
Reviewer: Russell Harris QC, a Planning and Environment Silk and Special Advocate at Landmark Chambers
The Common Freedom of the People
Author: Michael Braddick
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 9780198803232
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address