*/
Judge Walden: call the next case
Author: Peter Murphy
Publisher: No Exit Press
ISBN: 9780857302977
The third volume of HH Peter Murphy’s Judge Walden series is introduced by his Cambridge contemporary Baroness Hale. With a brevity which is the hallmark of a great lawyer, she compares how the Supreme Court would deal, say, with the illegality of bigamy, in contrast to the broader brush wielded by the resident judge of the fictional Bermondsey Crown Court. ‘He has a lot more fun than we do,’ she observes. But then, Judge Walden has the advantage of people in the public gallery shouting out something crucial, not to mention defendants who like to contribute to the evidence from the dock.
In this collection of short stories, barrister readers will feel an immediate sense of familiarity with the court setting and the behaviour of the participants. They may be less familiar with the kind of cases that are heard and the lengths to which the wise and forbearing narrator must go in order to decide the issues before him. Yet it is precisely the juxtaposition of realistic proceedings and a bit of inventiveness in the plot which provides the charm of the stories.
There are the issues of coping with paperless courts and with prosecution failures to disclose. The author has done substantial research on topics as varied as unexploded World War II bombs and how best to make a Caesar salad. There are clearly a number of avenues open to this fictional judge in resolving intractable problems. Sometimes matters are sorted by a somewhat fortuitous event, for example a juror informing the police officer, mid-trial, that she fancies him. That, however, is not unrealistic. This reviewer must confess that something of the kind once happened to him, although the juror first voted to convict my lay client before she sent me the inappropriate note.
"This reviewer must confess that something of the kind once happened to him..."
When the judge volunteers to hear a civil claim, he discovers that advocacy in the High Court is ‘not about grandstanding. They are working together to help me to understand the case... they are not going to allow formality to stand in the way of explaining the case to me in the most efficient way’.
As welcome as this is, he does feel ‘deprived’ that the witnesses have told their story in their witness statements rather than in the witness box. He hits upon the compromise of asking counsel to read the statements aloud so he can see how the witnesses react to hearing their own words.
Back at Bermondsey, it’s the ‘usual’ matter of barristers leading their own witness, inviting dock IDs and commenting rather than asking a question. But he has a soft spot for one advocate who can be ‘a bit frantic in court and occasionally gets a bit dishevelled as the day wears on; but she’s a dogged, relentless pursuer of dishonest and evasive witnesses’.
What underpins it all is a great love of courts, of the process, of the people and of the chance to achieve justice. One likes Judge Walden. If only he and his staff could be allowed to get on with it, without the interference of the civil servants whom he calls the ‘Grey Smoothies’.
Reviewer: David Wurtzel practised at the criminal Bar for 27 years and is a door tenant at 18 Red Lion Court. Prior to his retirement, he was a consultant in the CPD department at City Law School and consultant editor of Counsel. David is a member of the Counsel Editorial Board.
The third volume of HH Peter Murphy’s Judge Walden series is introduced by his Cambridge contemporary Baroness Hale. With a brevity which is the hallmark of a great lawyer, she compares how the Supreme Court would deal, say, with the illegality of bigamy, in contrast to the broader brush wielded by the resident judge of the fictional Bermondsey Crown Court. ‘He has a lot more fun than we do,’ she observes. But then, Judge Walden has the advantage of people in the public gallery shouting out something crucial, not to mention defendants who like to contribute to the evidence from the dock.
In this collection of short stories, barrister readers will feel an immediate sense of familiarity with the court setting and the behaviour of the participants. They may be less familiar with the kind of cases that are heard and the lengths to which the wise and forbearing narrator must go in order to decide the issues before him. Yet it is precisely the juxtaposition of realistic proceedings and a bit of inventiveness in the plot which provides the charm of the stories.
There are the issues of coping with paperless courts and with prosecution failures to disclose. The author has done substantial research on topics as varied as unexploded World War II bombs and how best to make a Caesar salad. There are clearly a number of avenues open to this fictional judge in resolving intractable problems. Sometimes matters are sorted by a somewhat fortuitous event, for example a juror informing the police officer, mid-trial, that she fancies him. That, however, is not unrealistic. This reviewer must confess that something of the kind once happened to him, although the juror first voted to convict my lay client before she sent me the inappropriate note.
"This reviewer must confess that something of the kind once happened to him..."
When the judge volunteers to hear a civil claim, he discovers that advocacy in the High Court is ‘not about grandstanding. They are working together to help me to understand the case... they are not going to allow formality to stand in the way of explaining the case to me in the most efficient way’.
As welcome as this is, he does feel ‘deprived’ that the witnesses have told their story in their witness statements rather than in the witness box. He hits upon the compromise of asking counsel to read the statements aloud so he can see how the witnesses react to hearing their own words.
Back at Bermondsey, it’s the ‘usual’ matter of barristers leading their own witness, inviting dock IDs and commenting rather than asking a question. But he has a soft spot for one advocate who can be ‘a bit frantic in court and occasionally gets a bit dishevelled as the day wears on; but she’s a dogged, relentless pursuer of dishonest and evasive witnesses’.
What underpins it all is a great love of courts, of the process, of the people and of the chance to achieve justice. One likes Judge Walden. If only he and his staff could be allowed to get on with it, without the interference of the civil servants whom he calls the ‘Grey Smoothies’.
Reviewer: David Wurtzel practised at the criminal Bar for 27 years and is a door tenant at 18 Red Lion Court. Prior to his retirement, he was a consultant in the CPD department at City Law School and consultant editor of Counsel. David is a member of the Counsel Editorial Board.
Judge Walden: call the next case
Author: Peter Murphy
Publisher: No Exit Press
ISBN: 9780857302977
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt