*/
Clarity for Lawyers: Effective Legal Language (3rd edition)
Authors: Mark Adler and Daphne Perry
Publisher: Law Society, 270pp
ISBN: 978-1784460488
This a very enjoyable, practical and persuasive guide for any lawyer who wants to improve their use of language. Indeed, as Lord Neuberger writes in his foreword, ‘anyone who is engaged in communication, whether in writing or by word of mouth, could profit from reading this book’.
The book is divided into five parts. It begins by analysing what is wrong with traditional legal writing, using everyday examples and demonstrating how legalese alienates judges, clients and the public. The second part highlights the aims of a legal writer before looking at what exactly plain language is and why it matters. The third part provides practical guidance on how to make your writing more effective, including how to organise and format your documents.
Chapters on key rules of punctuation and grammar include salutary lessons on the effects of getting them wrong: eg ‘For want of a comma, we have this case’ (O’Connor v Oakhurst Dairy, No. 16-901, 1st Cir. 2017). The use of modern computer software is considered. The fourth part of the book analyses how misunderstandings, vagueness, ambiguity, and misleading expectations can all easily be generated. The final part summarises the common law rules of interpretation.
The appendices are helpful; a legal writing workshop, with sample practical exercises in contract drafting; worked examples of revisions being made to solicitor’s correspondence, opinions, etc; and various precedents.
As a Law Society publication, it naturally leans more towards the work of solicitors but barristers will also benefit from the guidance provided.
The US federal judge, Elijah Barrett Prettyman, famously said that ‘the lawyer’s greatest weapon is clarity, and its whetstone is succinctness’ (cited by Herbert F Goodrich, A Case on Appeal – A Judge’s View; Appeals (American Law Institute,1952, p 6). This book will help any lawyer who wants to achieve both.
Reviewer: Michael McParland QC, Commercial Silk at Quadrant Chambers
This a very enjoyable, practical and persuasive guide for any lawyer who wants to improve their use of language. Indeed, as Lord Neuberger writes in his foreword, ‘anyone who is engaged in communication, whether in writing or by word of mouth, could profit from reading this book’.
The book is divided into five parts. It begins by analysing what is wrong with traditional legal writing, using everyday examples and demonstrating how legalese alienates judges, clients and the public. The second part highlights the aims of a legal writer before looking at what exactly plain language is and why it matters. The third part provides practical guidance on how to make your writing more effective, including how to organise and format your documents.
Chapters on key rules of punctuation and grammar include salutary lessons on the effects of getting them wrong: eg ‘For want of a comma, we have this case’ (O’Connor v Oakhurst Dairy, No. 16-901, 1st Cir. 2017). The use of modern computer software is considered. The fourth part of the book analyses how misunderstandings, vagueness, ambiguity, and misleading expectations can all easily be generated. The final part summarises the common law rules of interpretation.
The appendices are helpful; a legal writing workshop, with sample practical exercises in contract drafting; worked examples of revisions being made to solicitor’s correspondence, opinions, etc; and various precedents.
As a Law Society publication, it naturally leans more towards the work of solicitors but barristers will also benefit from the guidance provided.
The US federal judge, Elijah Barrett Prettyman, famously said that ‘the lawyer’s greatest weapon is clarity, and its whetstone is succinctness’ (cited by Herbert F Goodrich, A Case on Appeal – A Judge’s View; Appeals (American Law Institute,1952, p 6). This book will help any lawyer who wants to achieve both.
Reviewer: Michael McParland QC, Commercial Silk at Quadrant Chambers
Clarity for Lawyers: Effective Legal Language (3rd edition)
Authors: Mark Adler and Daphne Perry
Publisher: Law Society, 270pp
ISBN: 978-1784460488
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright
Following the launch of the Life at the Young Bar report and a nationwide listening exercise, Michael Polak and Michael Harwood outline the Young Barristers Committees raft of initiatives designed to address your issues of concern