*/
For centuries, the clerks’ room has been the cornerstone of chambers. Clerks have been the organisers, negotiators and practice builders behind the Bar, ensuring barristers are in the right place at the right time, with diaries managed, briefs secured and fees negotiated. This relationship remains as vital today as it has always been.
Yet alongside this traditional structure, the modern barrister is now faced with an unprecedented volume of administrative work. The demands of digital communication, client expectation, compliance and court procedure mean that administrative strain has never been heavier. While clerks remain central, their role is not designed to absorb every element of the daily burden. Barristers increasingly find themselves drowning in tasks that fall between the cracks of advocacy and clerking.
This is where virtual assistants, such as those provided by Eden Assistants, are changing the landscape.
A virtual assistant complements the work of clerks by stepping into this administrative gap. They are not a rival to the clerks’ room but an ally, creating an ecosystem of support that enables barristers to focus on what they do best: advocacy, strategy and client service.
A barrister’s day might begin with a court appearance, continue with conferences and end with written advice. Yet between these core tasks lies a host of smaller demands. An overflowing inbox, travel arrangements, last-minute document edits, or the need to compile bundles at speed all compete for time.
Eden Assistants often finds that barristers underestimate the cumulative impact of these demands. While no single email or draft correction consumes hours, the sheer accumulation can swallow entire days in a week. Barristers who reflect honestly on their time often realise they spend more hours on administration than they would ever wish to admit.
Consider the preparation of a skeleton argument. The substance is, of course, the barrister’s responsibility. Yet once drafted, the document must be formatted, proofread, paginated, and converted into the correct format for filing or inclusion in a bundle. These are not trivial tasks, and errors can cause professional embarrassment or worse. A virtual assistant with legal administration experience can take the draft and ensure it is presented to the highest standard, ready for court.
Similarly, bundles remain a constant source of frustration. Technology has made the process easier, but also more exacting. Mis-numbered pages, missing authorities or poor formatting can cause real disruption. Virtual assistants are adept at handling these tasks, ensuring compliance with court requirements and saving barristers hours of painstaking work.
Even beyond the court-facing tasks, virtual assistants provide value. From diary management to coordinating travel, from proofreading opinions to managing expenses, the range of support is extensive. In each case, the aim is the same: to allow the barrister to focus on substantive legal work rather than clerical distractions.
A natural concern for any barrister considering outsourcing is confidentiality. The Bar is rightly protective of client information, case strategy and data compliance. Eden Assistants addresses this directly.
Our virtual assistants work under strict confidentiality agreements, follow GDPR compliance and use secure systems for communication and document transfer. Many are experienced in legal administration and understand the expectations of the profession. The risk of error or breach is no greater than with in-house support staff, and in many cases, it is lower due to the rigorous processes in place.
This assurance allows barristers to delegate with confidence, knowing that the standards of the profession are upheld.
Life at the Bar is rarely predictable. Hearings overrun, conferences are arranged at short notice, and urgent instructions arrive without warning. Traditional in-house support may not be available outside core hours. A virtual assistant, by contrast, provides the flexibility barristers need.
Support can be scaled up in busy periods or reduced when work is quieter. Urgent assistance can be accessed when deadlines loom, without the need for a long-term staffing commitment. For barristers who prefer autonomy but also need reliability, this flexibility is invaluable.
Engaging in-house staff carries ongoing costs: salaries, pensions, training, and management. For many barristers, particularly sole practitioners or those in smaller sets, these costs are prohibitive. Virtual assistants offer a more agile solution. Barristers pay only for the time and services they need. There is no overhead, no holiday pay, no long-term commitment. That said, most barristers use this support as a-long term solution. They can have the same virtual assistant throughout their journey, providing trust and continuity.
This model preserves financial flexibility while ensuring professional support is always available. In a competitive environment, it is a way to maintain quality of service without inflating costs.
There is sometimes a reluctance at the Bar to embrace new forms of support, driven by a desire to preserve tradition. Yet virtual assistants do not change the essence of the Bar. They strengthen it. They enable barristers to focus on advocacy and legal analysis, ensuring that administrative tasks are handled to the highest standard without draining precious time.
By working alongside clerks rather than against them, virtual assistants create a holistic support structure. The clerks’ room remains central, but barristers gain an additional layer of professional assistance. This modernises practice without undermining tradition.
The Bar stands at a point where the demands of modern practice cannot be met by traditional structures alone. Clerks remain indispensable, but the administrative load continues to grow.
For barristers who value their time, their focus and their professional edge, embracing virtual support is not a departure from tradition. It is an evolution that respects the past while addressing the realities of the present. There are various testimonials from barristers here and on Google.
The clerks’ room will always be the heart of chambers. Virtual assistants ensure that heart continues to beat strongly, supported by the tools and resources needed for the Bar to thrive in the twenty-first century. Book a FREE no-obligation call with us today.
-(002).png?sfvrsn=9db1ab7a_1)
.png?sfvrsn=bd5b1ef1_1){kind=logo}
Eden Assistants is a Virtual Assistant company which specialises in supporting barristers. They handle administration, bundling, emails and more, so that you can focus on what matters most.
For centuries, the clerks’ room has been the cornerstone of chambers. Clerks have been the organisers, negotiators and practice builders behind the Bar, ensuring barristers are in the right place at the right time, with diaries managed, briefs secured and fees negotiated. This relationship remains as vital today as it has always been.
Yet alongside this traditional structure, the modern barrister is now faced with an unprecedented volume of administrative work. The demands of digital communication, client expectation, compliance and court procedure mean that administrative strain has never been heavier. While clerks remain central, their role is not designed to absorb every element of the daily burden. Barristers increasingly find themselves drowning in tasks that fall between the cracks of advocacy and clerking.
This is where virtual assistants, such as those provided by Eden Assistants, are changing the landscape.
A virtual assistant complements the work of clerks by stepping into this administrative gap. They are not a rival to the clerks’ room but an ally, creating an ecosystem of support that enables barristers to focus on what they do best: advocacy, strategy and client service.
A barrister’s day might begin with a court appearance, continue with conferences and end with written advice. Yet between these core tasks lies a host of smaller demands. An overflowing inbox, travel arrangements, last-minute document edits, or the need to compile bundles at speed all compete for time.
Eden Assistants often finds that barristers underestimate the cumulative impact of these demands. While no single email or draft correction consumes hours, the sheer accumulation can swallow entire days in a week. Barristers who reflect honestly on their time often realise they spend more hours on administration than they would ever wish to admit.
Consider the preparation of a skeleton argument. The substance is, of course, the barrister’s responsibility. Yet once drafted, the document must be formatted, proofread, paginated, and converted into the correct format for filing or inclusion in a bundle. These are not trivial tasks, and errors can cause professional embarrassment or worse. A virtual assistant with legal administration experience can take the draft and ensure it is presented to the highest standard, ready for court.
Similarly, bundles remain a constant source of frustration. Technology has made the process easier, but also more exacting. Mis-numbered pages, missing authorities or poor formatting can cause real disruption. Virtual assistants are adept at handling these tasks, ensuring compliance with court requirements and saving barristers hours of painstaking work.
Even beyond the court-facing tasks, virtual assistants provide value. From diary management to coordinating travel, from proofreading opinions to managing expenses, the range of support is extensive. In each case, the aim is the same: to allow the barrister to focus on substantive legal work rather than clerical distractions.
A natural concern for any barrister considering outsourcing is confidentiality. The Bar is rightly protective of client information, case strategy and data compliance. Eden Assistants addresses this directly.
Our virtual assistants work under strict confidentiality agreements, follow GDPR compliance and use secure systems for communication and document transfer. Many are experienced in legal administration and understand the expectations of the profession. The risk of error or breach is no greater than with in-house support staff, and in many cases, it is lower due to the rigorous processes in place.
This assurance allows barristers to delegate with confidence, knowing that the standards of the profession are upheld.
Life at the Bar is rarely predictable. Hearings overrun, conferences are arranged at short notice, and urgent instructions arrive without warning. Traditional in-house support may not be available outside core hours. A virtual assistant, by contrast, provides the flexibility barristers need.
Support can be scaled up in busy periods or reduced when work is quieter. Urgent assistance can be accessed when deadlines loom, without the need for a long-term staffing commitment. For barristers who prefer autonomy but also need reliability, this flexibility is invaluable.
Engaging in-house staff carries ongoing costs: salaries, pensions, training, and management. For many barristers, particularly sole practitioners or those in smaller sets, these costs are prohibitive. Virtual assistants offer a more agile solution. Barristers pay only for the time and services they need. There is no overhead, no holiday pay, no long-term commitment. That said, most barristers use this support as a-long term solution. They can have the same virtual assistant throughout their journey, providing trust and continuity.
This model preserves financial flexibility while ensuring professional support is always available. In a competitive environment, it is a way to maintain quality of service without inflating costs.
There is sometimes a reluctance at the Bar to embrace new forms of support, driven by a desire to preserve tradition. Yet virtual assistants do not change the essence of the Bar. They strengthen it. They enable barristers to focus on advocacy and legal analysis, ensuring that administrative tasks are handled to the highest standard without draining precious time.
By working alongside clerks rather than against them, virtual assistants create a holistic support structure. The clerks’ room remains central, but barristers gain an additional layer of professional assistance. This modernises practice without undermining tradition.
The Bar stands at a point where the demands of modern practice cannot be met by traditional structures alone. Clerks remain indispensable, but the administrative load continues to grow.
For barristers who value their time, their focus and their professional edge, embracing virtual support is not a departure from tradition. It is an evolution that respects the past while addressing the realities of the present. There are various testimonials from barristers here and on Google.
The clerks’ room will always be the heart of chambers. Virtual assistants ensure that heart continues to beat strongly, supported by the tools and resources needed for the Bar to thrive in the twenty-first century. Book a FREE no-obligation call with us today.
The Bar Council continues to call for investment for the justice system and represent the interests of our profession both at home and abroad
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
It’s been five years since the groundbreaking QC competition in which six Black women barristers, including the 2025 Chair of the Bar, took silk. Yet today, the number of Black KCs remains ‘critically low’. Desirée Artesi talks to Baroness Scotland KC, Allison Munroe KC and Melanie Simpson KC about the critical success factors, barriers and ideas for embedding change
