*/
Orlagh Kelly delves into the implications of ChatGPT, sharing insights from a recent webinar that brought to light a crucial concern for the junior Bar
ChatGPT, introduced in November 2022, quickly gained widespread attention, amassing over 100 million active users in just two months. Its unique approach, being dialogue-based rather than query-based like traditional search engines, soon captured the interest of legal professionals worldwide.
Briefed, a training platform for lawyers, recently hosted a webinar series for hundreds of barristers and chambers staff exploring the implications of ChatGPT for the profession. A stunning 74% of participants indicated that ChatGPT was a significant opportunity for the Bar.
However, views were mixed in the extensive workshop discussions. One pro-ChatGPTer stated: ‘I think it has the potential to speed up our work and help us become more time efficient’.
Another attendee thought it would put the job of a barrister in jeopardy: ‘As it becomes more widely known, people will think that it is a safe means of obtaining advice they might otherwise come to us for.’
The webinar brought to light concern over the impact on junior barristers in particular – that AI integration could lead to the removal of lower-end legal research, drafting and cases on which pupils and junior barristers cut their teeth.
Conversely, many believed that young or junior barristers able to use AI constructively will be the winners. ChatGPT can expedite work processes in areas such as drafting initial misconduct work, personal injury claims analysis, family law, access to justice research, and paralegal assistance.
A US attorney used AI-generated arguments which fabricated legal precedents that ChatGPT essentially ‘hallucinated’. He was consequently fined by his governing body. This underscores the importance of human oversight in AI-generated content and the role that legal regulators may have to play.
ChatGPT undoubtedly presents exciting prospects for barristers and chambers. However, it is imperative to acknowledge its limitations, potential inaccuracies, and data security concerns. The future lies in a balanced integration of AI with human expertise, where AI augments, rather than replaces, barristers.
As the webinar participants highlighted, ensuring that junior barristers have ample opportunities to develop their skills in a changing environment is a challenge that must be addressed.
The biggest potential risk is, of course, ignoring this new age of technology, and failing to adapt as competitors are steaming ahead.
Orlagh Kelly, Barrister & CEO of Briefed, is a highly experienced barrister, accomplished legal technologist and internationally renowned authority on data protection. It is that unique blend of legal expertise and entrepreneurial spirit which inspired her to found Briefed in 2012.
ChatGPT, introduced in November 2022, quickly gained widespread attention, amassing over 100 million active users in just two months. Its unique approach, being dialogue-based rather than query-based like traditional search engines, soon captured the interest of legal professionals worldwide.
Briefed, a training platform for lawyers, recently hosted a webinar series for hundreds of barristers and chambers staff exploring the implications of ChatGPT for the profession. A stunning 74% of participants indicated that ChatGPT was a significant opportunity for the Bar.
However, views were mixed in the extensive workshop discussions. One pro-ChatGPTer stated: ‘I think it has the potential to speed up our work and help us become more time efficient’.
Another attendee thought it would put the job of a barrister in jeopardy: ‘As it becomes more widely known, people will think that it is a safe means of obtaining advice they might otherwise come to us for.’
The webinar brought to light concern over the impact on junior barristers in particular – that AI integration could lead to the removal of lower-end legal research, drafting and cases on which pupils and junior barristers cut their teeth.
Conversely, many believed that young or junior barristers able to use AI constructively will be the winners. ChatGPT can expedite work processes in areas such as drafting initial misconduct work, personal injury claims analysis, family law, access to justice research, and paralegal assistance.
A US attorney used AI-generated arguments which fabricated legal precedents that ChatGPT essentially ‘hallucinated’. He was consequently fined by his governing body. This underscores the importance of human oversight in AI-generated content and the role that legal regulators may have to play.
ChatGPT undoubtedly presents exciting prospects for barristers and chambers. However, it is imperative to acknowledge its limitations, potential inaccuracies, and data security concerns. The future lies in a balanced integration of AI with human expertise, where AI augments, rather than replaces, barristers.
As the webinar participants highlighted, ensuring that junior barristers have ample opportunities to develop their skills in a changing environment is a challenge that must be addressed.
The biggest potential risk is, of course, ignoring this new age of technology, and failing to adapt as competitors are steaming ahead.
Orlagh Kelly delves into the implications of ChatGPT, sharing insights from a recent webinar that brought to light a crucial concern for the junior Bar
Chair of the Bar sets out a busy calendar for the rest of the year
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Examined by Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Time is precious for barristers. Every moment spent chasing paperwork, organising diaries, or managing admin is time taken away from what matters most: preparation, advocacy and your clients. That’s where Eden Assistants step in
AlphaBiolabs has announced its latest Giving Back donation to RAY Ceredigion, a grassroots West Wales charity that provides play, learning and community opportunities for families across Ceredigion County
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
Come in with your eyes open, but don’t let fear cloud the prospect. A view from practice by John Dove
Anon Academic explains why he’s leaving the world of English literature for the Bar – after all, the two are not as far apart as they may first seem...
Review by Stephen Cragg KC
