*/
Orlagh Kelly delves into the implications of ChatGPT, sharing insights from a recent webinar that brought to light a crucial concern for the junior Bar
ChatGPT, introduced in November 2022, quickly gained widespread attention, amassing over 100 million active users in just two months. Its unique approach, being dialogue-based rather than query-based like traditional search engines, soon captured the interest of legal professionals worldwide.
Briefed, a training platform for lawyers, recently hosted a webinar series for hundreds of barristers and chambers staff exploring the implications of ChatGPT for the profession. A stunning 74% of participants indicated that ChatGPT was a significant opportunity for the Bar.
However, views were mixed in the extensive workshop discussions. One pro-ChatGPTer stated: ‘I think it has the potential to speed up our work and help us become more time efficient’.
Another attendee thought it would put the job of a barrister in jeopardy: ‘As it becomes more widely known, people will think that it is a safe means of obtaining advice they might otherwise come to us for.’
The webinar brought to light concern over the impact on junior barristers in particular – that AI integration could lead to the removal of lower-end legal research, drafting and cases on which pupils and junior barristers cut their teeth.
Conversely, many believed that young or junior barristers able to use AI constructively will be the winners. ChatGPT can expedite work processes in areas such as drafting initial misconduct work, personal injury claims analysis, family law, access to justice research, and paralegal assistance.
A US attorney used AI-generated arguments which fabricated legal precedents that ChatGPT essentially ‘hallucinated’. He was consequently fined by his governing body. This underscores the importance of human oversight in AI-generated content and the role that legal regulators may have to play.
ChatGPT undoubtedly presents exciting prospects for barristers and chambers. However, it is imperative to acknowledge its limitations, potential inaccuracies, and data security concerns. The future lies in a balanced integration of AI with human expertise, where AI augments, rather than replaces, barristers.
As the webinar participants highlighted, ensuring that junior barristers have ample opportunities to develop their skills in a changing environment is a challenge that must be addressed.
The biggest potential risk is, of course, ignoring this new age of technology, and failing to adapt as competitors are steaming ahead.
Orlagh Kelly, Barrister & CEO of Briefed, is a highly experienced barrister, accomplished legal technologist and internationally renowned authority on data protection. It is that unique blend of legal expertise and entrepreneurial spirit which inspired her to found Briefed in 2012.
ChatGPT, introduced in November 2022, quickly gained widespread attention, amassing over 100 million active users in just two months. Its unique approach, being dialogue-based rather than query-based like traditional search engines, soon captured the interest of legal professionals worldwide.
Briefed, a training platform for lawyers, recently hosted a webinar series for hundreds of barristers and chambers staff exploring the implications of ChatGPT for the profession. A stunning 74% of participants indicated that ChatGPT was a significant opportunity for the Bar.
However, views were mixed in the extensive workshop discussions. One pro-ChatGPTer stated: ‘I think it has the potential to speed up our work and help us become more time efficient’.
Another attendee thought it would put the job of a barrister in jeopardy: ‘As it becomes more widely known, people will think that it is a safe means of obtaining advice they might otherwise come to us for.’
The webinar brought to light concern over the impact on junior barristers in particular – that AI integration could lead to the removal of lower-end legal research, drafting and cases on which pupils and junior barristers cut their teeth.
Conversely, many believed that young or junior barristers able to use AI constructively will be the winners. ChatGPT can expedite work processes in areas such as drafting initial misconduct work, personal injury claims analysis, family law, access to justice research, and paralegal assistance.
A US attorney used AI-generated arguments which fabricated legal precedents that ChatGPT essentially ‘hallucinated’. He was consequently fined by his governing body. This underscores the importance of human oversight in AI-generated content and the role that legal regulators may have to play.
ChatGPT undoubtedly presents exciting prospects for barristers and chambers. However, it is imperative to acknowledge its limitations, potential inaccuracies, and data security concerns. The future lies in a balanced integration of AI with human expertise, where AI augments, rather than replaces, barristers.
As the webinar participants highlighted, ensuring that junior barristers have ample opportunities to develop their skills in a changing environment is a challenge that must be addressed.
The biggest potential risk is, of course, ignoring this new age of technology, and failing to adapt as competitors are steaming ahead.
Orlagh Kelly delves into the implications of ChatGPT, sharing insights from a recent webinar that brought to light a crucial concern for the junior Bar
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
Kindness Ambassadors – coming to a courtroom near you! Valerie Charbit, Nicola Shannon KC and Professor Robin Banerjee update readers on the second phase of the project examining, and promoting, the impact of kindness and how it can fit into an adversarial system
