*/
Orlagh Kelly delves into the implications of ChatGPT, sharing insights from a recent webinar that brought to light a crucial concern for the junior Bar
ChatGPT, introduced in November 2022, quickly gained widespread attention, amassing over 100 million active users in just two months. Its unique approach, being dialogue-based rather than query-based like traditional search engines, soon captured the interest of legal professionals worldwide.
Briefed, a training platform for lawyers, recently hosted a webinar series for hundreds of barristers and chambers staff exploring the implications of ChatGPT for the profession. A stunning 74% of participants indicated that ChatGPT was a significant opportunity for the Bar.
However, views were mixed in the extensive workshop discussions. One pro-ChatGPTer stated: ‘I think it has the potential to speed up our work and help us become more time efficient’.
Another attendee thought it would put the job of a barrister in jeopardy: ‘As it becomes more widely known, people will think that it is a safe means of obtaining advice they might otherwise come to us for.’
The webinar brought to light concern over the impact on junior barristers in particular – that AI integration could lead to the removal of lower-end legal research, drafting and cases on which pupils and junior barristers cut their teeth.
Conversely, many believed that young or junior barristers able to use AI constructively will be the winners. ChatGPT can expedite work processes in areas such as drafting initial misconduct work, personal injury claims analysis, family law, access to justice research, and paralegal assistance.
A US attorney used AI-generated arguments which fabricated legal precedents that ChatGPT essentially ‘hallucinated’. He was consequently fined by his governing body. This underscores the importance of human oversight in AI-generated content and the role that legal regulators may have to play.
ChatGPT undoubtedly presents exciting prospects for barristers and chambers. However, it is imperative to acknowledge its limitations, potential inaccuracies, and data security concerns. The future lies in a balanced integration of AI with human expertise, where AI augments, rather than replaces, barristers.
As the webinar participants highlighted, ensuring that junior barristers have ample opportunities to develop their skills in a changing environment is a challenge that must be addressed.
The biggest potential risk is, of course, ignoring this new age of technology, and failing to adapt as competitors are steaming ahead.
Orlagh Kelly, Barrister & CEO of Briefed, is a highly experienced barrister, accomplished legal technologist and internationally renowned authority on data protection. It is that unique blend of legal expertise and entrepreneurial spirit which inspired her to found Briefed in 2012.
ChatGPT, introduced in November 2022, quickly gained widespread attention, amassing over 100 million active users in just two months. Its unique approach, being dialogue-based rather than query-based like traditional search engines, soon captured the interest of legal professionals worldwide.
Briefed, a training platform for lawyers, recently hosted a webinar series for hundreds of barristers and chambers staff exploring the implications of ChatGPT for the profession. A stunning 74% of participants indicated that ChatGPT was a significant opportunity for the Bar.
However, views were mixed in the extensive workshop discussions. One pro-ChatGPTer stated: ‘I think it has the potential to speed up our work and help us become more time efficient’.
Another attendee thought it would put the job of a barrister in jeopardy: ‘As it becomes more widely known, people will think that it is a safe means of obtaining advice they might otherwise come to us for.’
The webinar brought to light concern over the impact on junior barristers in particular – that AI integration could lead to the removal of lower-end legal research, drafting and cases on which pupils and junior barristers cut their teeth.
Conversely, many believed that young or junior barristers able to use AI constructively will be the winners. ChatGPT can expedite work processes in areas such as drafting initial misconduct work, personal injury claims analysis, family law, access to justice research, and paralegal assistance.
A US attorney used AI-generated arguments which fabricated legal precedents that ChatGPT essentially ‘hallucinated’. He was consequently fined by his governing body. This underscores the importance of human oversight in AI-generated content and the role that legal regulators may have to play.
ChatGPT undoubtedly presents exciting prospects for barristers and chambers. However, it is imperative to acknowledge its limitations, potential inaccuracies, and data security concerns. The future lies in a balanced integration of AI with human expertise, where AI augments, rather than replaces, barristers.
As the webinar participants highlighted, ensuring that junior barristers have ample opportunities to develop their skills in a changing environment is a challenge that must be addressed.
The biggest potential risk is, of course, ignoring this new age of technology, and failing to adapt as competitors are steaming ahead.
Orlagh Kelly delves into the implications of ChatGPT, sharing insights from a recent webinar that brought to light a crucial concern for the junior Bar
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC present their best buys for this holiday season
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
