*/
Christine Kings explains the changes currently being carried out to BARMARK.
BARMARK, the quality standard for the Bar, is about to undergo radical change. The voluntary scheme, designed to recognise best practice, was launched in July 1999 with the sole aim of improving the administration of chambers. It now needs a major overhaul to make it suitable for a highly competitive 21st century legal services market.
The Legal Practice Management Association (LPMA) has been working on the draft of a revised standard on behalf of the Bar Council since mid 2011. Senior managers and senior clerks in chambers will largely be responsible for implementation and the LPMA has taken the opportunity to ensure that the new standard will focus on continuous improvement to client services. It will not waste time on tick-box exercises which have little value to the success of the business. The draft revised standard, which was completed in April, is now out for consultation and we are inviting comments from chambers and interested parties.
Benchmarking standards
We have set out to ensure that those bodies with an interest in promoting quality services at the Bar are satisfied that the new BARMARK meets or exceeds their requirements. The LPMA has therefore benchmarked the revised standard against the LSC’s Quality Mark for the Bar, the Solicitors Quality Mark, the new Solicitors Regulation Authority Handbook, Lexcel, ISO9001, Investors in People, and compliance standards required by the Bar Standards Board, the Attorney General’s Department and the CPS. It is anticipated that BARMARK-accredited chambers will be subject to less frequent monitoring than non-accredited sets.
One size does not fit all
The one-size-fits-all approach is no longer appropriate in the new deregulated legal environment. The onus will be on chambers to demonstrate good business practice relevant to the market they are operating in and to show that this has had an impact on profitability. The new kitemark will allow chambers to demonstrate excellence in the most appropriate way to their circumstances. Whilst a commercial set might be able to plan three years ahead with confidence, a criminal set, or one that is predominantly funded through CFAs, will need to keep a close eye on developments over the next 12 months.
Operation and content
We envisage that the new standard will operate online through the Bar Council website. It will be structured in much the same way as a tax return so that chambers complete only those sections of the BARMARK accreditation that are relevant to them. There will be core competencies that must be met by all sets, however. These will cover: strategic development and operational management; financial management; human resources and pupillage; client care; and clerking and case management. Optional modules, which chambers will select as necessary, are likely to include: public access; ABSs; contracting with the Legal Services Commission (LSC); and tendering and contracting with local authorities and other suppliers of work. As with the tax return, relevant guidance about how to evidence the competencies will be embedded in the system and accessed through hyperlinks.
Barrister input
The revised standard will require more input from barristers - unlike the current version of BARMARK. For example, under the section on strategic development a chambers will be asked to demonstrate that “leadership and effective management improves the performance” of the organisation. One of the outcomes required is that “managers and senior barristers are role models of leadership, teamwork and knowledge sharing”, and one of the ways of evidencing this will be to ask junior barristers and staff for examples of this behaviour.
Diversity issues
Equality and diversity issues - relevant to every aspect of the day-to-day running of chambers - should no longer be viewed as an “add-on” and have been integrated into each section of the standard.
Timing and assessment
Introduction of the new standard will be staggered, with plenty of time for chambers with existing BARMARK accreditation to make preparations. Discussions are ongoing as to which body, if any, will conduct the assessments, the basis on which the standard will be issued, and a suitable appeal process for chambers not deemed to have made the grade.
Ensuring value
In a rapidly changing legal market with new challenges and opportunities around every corner, we want to ensure that this revised quality standard provides a framework which will help chambers focus on priorities and achieve business objectives. It has no value otherwise. It must give confidence to every client. It must be viewed as a mark of quality across the industry; one that says this is an organisation which is professionally run, commercially competent and delivers a service which stands out from its competitors.
See the draft new standard at www.BarCouncil.org.uk or email Alex Straker astraker@BarCouncil.org.uk. The consultation period will close on Friday 29 June 2012.
Christine Kings, Commercial Director, Outer Temple Chambers
BarMark 2012: timeline
End of April: draft of the new standard completed
May/June: consultation with chambers and interested bodies
End of June: core competency model integrated into Bar Council website
September: launch of new quality standard
Quality Mark holders
The Legal Services Commission intends to withdraw the Quality Mark for the Bar (QMB) standard. It has been agreed that all existing QMB holders that wish to obtain the new BARMARK standard will be offered a reduced registration fee, provided they apply for the standard within 3 months of the standard becoming operational. These chambers will then be required to be audited against the revised BARMARK standard in accordance with its procedures. The Legal Services Commission will contact all QMB holders to inform them of the steps that they will need to take.
The Legal Practice Management Association (LPMA) has been working on the draft of a revised standard on behalf of the Bar Council since mid 2011. Senior managers and senior clerks in chambers will largely be responsible for implementation and the LPMA has taken the opportunity to ensure that the new standard will focus on continuous improvement to client services. It will not waste time on tick-box exercises which have little value to the success of the business. The draft revised standard, which was completed in April, is now out for consultation and we are inviting comments from chambers and interested parties.
Benchmarking standards
We have set out to ensure that those bodies with an interest in promoting quality services at the Bar are satisfied that the new BARMARK meets or exceeds their requirements. The LPMA has therefore benchmarked the revised standard against the LSC’s Quality Mark for the Bar, the Solicitors Quality Mark, the new Solicitors Regulation Authority Handbook, Lexcel, ISO9001, Investors in People, and compliance standards required by the Bar Standards Board, the Attorney General’s Department and the CPS. It is anticipated that BARMARK-accredited chambers will be subject to less frequent monitoring than non-accredited sets.
One size does not fit all
The one-size-fits-all approach is no longer appropriate in the new deregulated legal environment. The onus will be on chambers to demonstrate good business practice relevant to the market they are operating in and to show that this has had an impact on profitability. The new kitemark will allow chambers to demonstrate excellence in the most appropriate way to their circumstances. Whilst a commercial set might be able to plan three years ahead with confidence, a criminal set, or one that is predominantly funded through CFAs, will need to keep a close eye on developments over the next 12 months.
Operation and content
We envisage that the new standard will operate online through the Bar Council website. It will be structured in much the same way as a tax return so that chambers complete only those sections of the BARMARK accreditation that are relevant to them. There will be core competencies that must be met by all sets, however. These will cover: strategic development and operational management; financial management; human resources and pupillage; client care; and clerking and case management. Optional modules, which chambers will select as necessary, are likely to include: public access; ABSs; contracting with the Legal Services Commission (LSC); and tendering and contracting with local authorities and other suppliers of work. As with the tax return, relevant guidance about how to evidence the competencies will be embedded in the system and accessed through hyperlinks.
Barrister input
The revised standard will require more input from barristers - unlike the current version of BARMARK. For example, under the section on strategic development a chambers will be asked to demonstrate that “leadership and effective management improves the performance” of the organisation. One of the outcomes required is that “managers and senior barristers are role models of leadership, teamwork and knowledge sharing”, and one of the ways of evidencing this will be to ask junior barristers and staff for examples of this behaviour.
Diversity issues
Equality and diversity issues - relevant to every aspect of the day-to-day running of chambers - should no longer be viewed as an “add-on” and have been integrated into each section of the standard.
Timing and assessment
Introduction of the new standard will be staggered, with plenty of time for chambers with existing BARMARK accreditation to make preparations. Discussions are ongoing as to which body, if any, will conduct the assessments, the basis on which the standard will be issued, and a suitable appeal process for chambers not deemed to have made the grade.
Ensuring value
In a rapidly changing legal market with new challenges and opportunities around every corner, we want to ensure that this revised quality standard provides a framework which will help chambers focus on priorities and achieve business objectives. It has no value otherwise. It must give confidence to every client. It must be viewed as a mark of quality across the industry; one that says this is an organisation which is professionally run, commercially competent and delivers a service which stands out from its competitors.
See the draft new standard at www.BarCouncil.org.uk or email Alex Straker astraker@BarCouncil.org.uk. The consultation period will close on Friday 29 June 2012.
Christine Kings, Commercial Director, Outer Temple Chambers
BarMark 2012: timeline
End of April: draft of the new standard completed
May/June: consultation with chambers and interested bodies
End of June: core competency model integrated into Bar Council website
September: launch of new quality standard
Quality Mark holders
The Legal Services Commission intends to withdraw the Quality Mark for the Bar (QMB) standard. It has been agreed that all existing QMB holders that wish to obtain the new BARMARK standard will be offered a reduced registration fee, provided they apply for the standard within 3 months of the standard becoming operational. These chambers will then be required to be audited against the revised BARMARK standard in accordance with its procedures. The Legal Services Commission will contact all QMB holders to inform them of the steps that they will need to take.
Christine Kings explains the changes currently being carried out to BARMARK.
BARMARK, the quality standard for the Bar, is about to undergo radical change. The voluntary scheme, designed to recognise best practice, was launched in July 1999 with the sole aim of improving the administration of chambers. It now needs a major overhaul to make it suitable for a highly competitive 21st century legal services market.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will