*/
THE Bar Council and the Family Law Bar Association (FLBA) have endorsed the reforms recommending in Lord Laming’s report on child protection. Published on the 12th March, the report has highlighted the difficulties faced by professionals working to protect the most vulnerable in society. Increasingly complex cases which often involve alcohol and drug abuse, as well as mental health problems, are being faced by professionals in the front line of social services. Large caseloads are preventing poorly-prepared staff from addressing adequately the needs of troubled families.
The report’s recommendations include making all participants in care proceedings responsible for the reduction of delays in progressing
cases, and the appointment of an independent person to undertake a review of the impact of court fees, with a view to abolishing them from 2010/11 onwards.
Speaking as the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, the Rt Hon Ed Balls MP, announced mandatory training for all local authority directors of children’s services, the Chair of the FLBA, Lucy Theis QC, said:
‘The report by Lord Laming, and the Minister’s response, set out very clearly the huge challenge faced by those dealing with vulnerable families on a daily basis. The support and expertise of the family Bar, which provides specialist representation by dedicated practitioners who often have to deal with incredibly difficult situations involving child protection, is vital if we are to give the public the service they deserve.’ She continued:
‘It may well be that the laws which address child protection need to be reconsidered in the light of the spate of recent tragedies and the
findings contained in this report. The FLBA is committed to the best possible representation for those going through the family justice system; any changes to the law, which assist in the protection of vulnerable children, would be welcomed.’
Desmond Browne QC, the Chairman of the Bar, added:
‘The Bar Council has consistently warned about the effect of the enormous rise in court fees in May 2008 on local authorities’ ability to initiate child care proceedings. It was inevitable that an increase from £150 to £4,825 for a fully contested matter would deter some authorities from acting. As Lord Laming rightly says, “if even in one case a local authority is deterred from taking action, that is one case too many.” It is wrong in principle that in cases where a child’s safety is at risk, the government should be trying to recover court costs from litigants. They should think again.’
THE Bar Council and the Family Law Bar Association (FLBA) have endorsed the reforms recommending in Lord Laming’s report on child protection. Published on the 12th March, the report has highlighted the difficulties faced by professionals working to protect the most vulnerable in society. Increasingly complex cases which often involve alcohol and drug abuse, as well as mental health problems, are being faced by professionals in the front line of social services. Large caseloads are preventing poorly-prepared staff from addressing adequately the needs of troubled families.
The report’s recommendations include making all participants in care proceedings responsible for the reduction of delays in progressing
cases, and the appointment of an independent person to undertake a review of the impact of court fees, with a view to abolishing them from 2010/11 onwards.
Speaking as the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, the Rt Hon Ed Balls MP, announced mandatory training for all local authority directors of children’s services, the Chair of the FLBA, Lucy Theis QC, said:
‘The report by Lord Laming, and the Minister’s response, set out very clearly the huge challenge faced by those dealing with vulnerable families on a daily basis. The support and expertise of the family Bar, which provides specialist representation by dedicated practitioners who often have to deal with incredibly difficult situations involving child protection, is vital if we are to give the public the service they deserve.’ She continued:
‘It may well be that the laws which address child protection need to be reconsidered in the light of the spate of recent tragedies and the
findings contained in this report. The FLBA is committed to the best possible representation for those going through the family justice system; any changes to the law, which assist in the protection of vulnerable children, would be welcomed.’
Desmond Browne QC, the Chairman of the Bar, added:
‘The Bar Council has consistently warned about the effect of the enormous rise in court fees in May 2008 on local authorities’ ability to initiate child care proceedings. It was inevitable that an increase from £150 to £4,825 for a fully contested matter would deter some authorities from acting. As Lord Laming rightly says, “if even in one case a local authority is deterred from taking action, that is one case too many.” It is wrong in principle that in cases where a child’s safety is at risk, the government should be trying to recover court costs from litigants. They should think again.’
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By Kem Kemal, CEO, Henry Dannell
By BSK Financial Planning
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
Join us on Saturday 21 November 2026 at Leeds Beckett University and see for yourself why the North continues to be an exceptional place to build a career at the Bar
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
