*/
THE Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, has consulted the profession on outline proposals for revising the Crown Prosecution Service’s (CPS) process for the selection of selfemployed advocates. The proposals were drawn up following lengthy discussions between the Bar Council and CPS about the new Panel Scheme which the CPS wishes to introduce.
The proposals would see the current advocates’ lists replaced with a smaller panel, for cases at levels two to four (with lists broadly maintained for level one). There would be an open competition for advocates to join the panel; a clear focus on quality as part of the selection criteria and a greater opportunity to prosecute for those who secure a place. One criticism of the current system is that many on the existing lists are rarely or never instructed. An important aspect of the proposed scheme is the creation of a stable relationship between the CPS and the Bar for the foreseeable future, which addresses key issues such as quality, volume of work, and size of panel.
Nicholas Green QC, Chairman of the Bar Council, said:
“The proposals reflect a new understanding between the Bar and the CPS and a real desire to build a solid foundation for a mutually beneficial relationship. In these difficult economic times concessions, necessarily, have been made on both sides to enable us to move towards the current position. It is now important that the views of the Bar are considered and, in the light of those responses, to continue our dialogue with the CPS on a positive footing”.
Keir Starmer QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions said:
“Ensuring that all prosecution advocates meet the high standard necessary to deliver justice is a top priority for both the CPS and the Bar Council. We have jointly developed this proposal for a system that will improve quality by allowing the self-employed bar access to prosecution work through a competency based application process and by moving to smaller panels of advocates who will focus on high quality prosecution work alongside our in-house advocates. We now look forward to examining the views of practising barristers on this proposal and our discussions with the Bar Council will move forward in due course.”
The Attorney General, the Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP said:
“We are in a period of fundamental review; an opportunity for root and branch reform. I commend both the CPS and Bar Council for this approach and I am looking forward to them using all their professional skills, creativity and innovation to deliver the core prosecution services which the public needs, to an even higher standard.”
The proposals would see the current advocates’ lists replaced with a smaller panel, for cases at levels two to four (with lists broadly maintained for level one). There would be an open competition for advocates to join the panel; a clear focus on quality as part of the selection criteria and a greater opportunity to prosecute for those who secure a place. One criticism of the current system is that many on the existing lists are rarely or never instructed. An important aspect of the proposed scheme is the creation of a stable relationship between the CPS and the Bar for the foreseeable future, which addresses key issues such as quality, volume of work, and size of panel.
Nicholas Green QC, Chairman of the Bar Council, said:
“The proposals reflect a new understanding between the Bar and the CPS and a real desire to build a solid foundation for a mutually beneficial relationship. In these difficult economic times concessions, necessarily, have been made on both sides to enable us to move towards the current position. It is now important that the views of the Bar are considered and, in the light of those responses, to continue our dialogue with the CPS on a positive footing”.
Keir Starmer QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions said:
“Ensuring that all prosecution advocates meet the high standard necessary to deliver justice is a top priority for both the CPS and the Bar Council. We have jointly developed this proposal for a system that will improve quality by allowing the self-employed bar access to prosecution work through a competency based application process and by moving to smaller panels of advocates who will focus on high quality prosecution work alongside our in-house advocates. We now look forward to examining the views of practising barristers on this proposal and our discussions with the Bar Council will move forward in due course.”
The Attorney General, the Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP said:
“We are in a period of fundamental review; an opportunity for root and branch reform. I commend both the CPS and Bar Council for this approach and I am looking forward to them using all their professional skills, creativity and innovation to deliver the core prosecution services which the public needs, to an even higher standard.”
THE Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, has consulted the profession on outline proposals for revising the Crown Prosecution Service’s (CPS) process for the selection of selfemployed advocates. The proposals were drawn up following lengthy discussions between the Bar Council and CPS about the new Panel Scheme which the CPS wishes to introduce.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Jemima Coleman and Zoë Leventhal KC on the evolving global movement seeking to reframe how we view nature: to recognise that nature possesses inherent rights and to enshrine these rights in law
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
