*/
The BSB has recently published a consultation paper on its proposals for revisions to barristers’ practising arrangements. Charles Hollander QC and Sarah Brown outline the key themes and explore the challenges ahead.
The Legal Services Act 2007 (“the Act”) introduces into the regulatory arena the principle of authorisation to practise. In terms of the Bar, this requires new procedures which build upon and extend the current practising certificate regime. The Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) has recently issued a consultation paper on its proposals for authorisation to practise arrangements.
Section 13(2) of the Act requires individuals wishing to provide reserved legal activities (exercising a right of audience, conducting litigation etc) to be authorised to do so by the relevant approved regulator.
For a transitional period, barristers who have practising certificates are deemed to be authorised, but at the end of this period, the BSB will be required to have in place measures to authorise barristers to undertake such activities. The current practising certificate regime operates effectively but the BSB believes that the authorisation requirements of the Act necessitate a strengthened approach which is more directly linked to compliance with the criteria, such as holding appropriate professional indemnity insurance cover, that must be met in order to practise as a barrister.
Under the proposed regime, the practising certificate will become an entitlement to practise. Barristers wishing to renew their practising certificate will have to complete a form, probably online, which verifies their practising address, their status and entitlement to carry out reserved legal activities and which declares the number of hours of CPD completed in the last calendar year and that adequate indemnity insurance cover has been obtained and paid for.
We believe that these proposals will benefit individual practitioners and provide greater clarity to those who use barristers’ services. Furthermore, the proposals will enable joined up administration of the BSB’s internal systems (which will further benefit members of the Bar) and promote a proportionate response to non-compliance with the practising requirements.
Barristers without full entitlements to practise
As the practising arrangements have developed over the last ten years the number of categories of barristers has increased, with each category having a different or limited entitlement to practise. This creates confusion and uncertainty, both for the profession and for members of the public.
The BSB has therefore taken the creation of an authorisation to practise regime as an opportunity to try to regularise the position. To do so, the following is proposed:
Barristers who are not entitled to practise may not hold themselves out as barristers if they supply legal services. This rule will remain but will be strengthened and clarified so as to protect the interests of the public who deal with them without imposing disproportionate restrictions on the barristers concerned:
These measures are intended to provide greater certainty for members of the public about what their barrister can and cannot do.
The proposed change in the regulatory approach to dealing with barristers without full entitlements to practise will require transitional arrangements to ensure a smooth shift from the old regime to the new. The BSB will develop such arrangements once the outcomes of the consultation are known.
The Barristers’ Register
The Register, which the BSB introduced in October 2009, will provide the public face for the new authorisation to practise regime and will reflect individual barristers’ practising entitlements. It will also provide a useful medium for explaining and publicising the final authorisation regime to the profession and the public.
Challenges to be faced
Education and publicity will be critical to ensure that any new authorisation to practise regime is implemented successfully. The consultation paper has been sent to all chambers as well as all employed and non-practising barristers who are registered with the Bar Council. The BSB will also be contacting the main consumer bodies as well as a number of representative bodies for users of barristers’ services. Once the scheme is finalised a further round of education and publicity will be undertaken. Ideas on how that can best be achieved would be most welcome in responses to the consultation paper.
The BSB’s internal systems will need to be developed and enhanced to enable a more joined up approach to authorisation to practise. Accuracy of information will be vital as will a robust and dependable IT framework.
The 2007 Act establishes a new regime for the provision and regulation of legal services. The Act identifies six types of reserved legal activities: the exercise of a right of audience; the conduct of litigation; reserved instrument activities; probate activities; notarial activities; and the administration of oaths. Under the Act, the BSB is able to authorise barristers to undertake reserved legal activities, with the exception of notarial activities. In addition to regulating reserved legal activities, the BSB also regulates practising barristers who undertake non-reserved legal activities (including giving oral and written legal advice). It also regulates, to a limited extent, barristers who are not considered to be “practising” but none the less give legal advice.
Next steps
The deadline for consultation is 1 June 2010. A copy of the paper “Development of authorisation to practise arrangements – Consultation Paper” can be found in the consultation section of the BSB website at www.barstandardsboard.org.uk. The proposed changes to the practising arrangements for barristers will impact to varying degrees on the large majority of the Bar. The BSB is therefore keen to secure a wide range of responses to the proposals set out in this paper. We would be interested to know if our proposals are expected to have an adverse impact on any particular sector of clients or barristers. It is proposed that the new authorisation to practise regime will be introduced towards the end of 2011 so that it is in place for renewals at the start of 2012.
Charles Hollander QC and Sarah Brown are Chair and Vice-chair of the BSB’s Standards Committee respectively as well as members of the Board itself. They are joint Chairs of the BSB’s review of the Bar’s Code of Conduct.
Section 13(2) of the Act requires individuals wishing to provide reserved legal activities (exercising a right of audience, conducting litigation etc) to be authorised to do so by the relevant approved regulator.
For a transitional period, barristers who have practising certificates are deemed to be authorised, but at the end of this period, the BSB will be required to have in place measures to authorise barristers to undertake such activities. The current practising certificate regime operates effectively but the BSB believes that the authorisation requirements of the Act necessitate a strengthened approach which is more directly linked to compliance with the criteria, such as holding appropriate professional indemnity insurance cover, that must be met in order to practise as a barrister.
Under the proposed regime, the practising certificate will become an entitlement to practise. Barristers wishing to renew their practising certificate will have to complete a form, probably online, which verifies their practising address, their status and entitlement to carry out reserved legal activities and which declares the number of hours of CPD completed in the last calendar year and that adequate indemnity insurance cover has been obtained and paid for.
We believe that these proposals will benefit individual practitioners and provide greater clarity to those who use barristers’ services. Furthermore, the proposals will enable joined up administration of the BSB’s internal systems (which will further benefit members of the Bar) and promote a proportionate response to non-compliance with the practising requirements.
Barristers without full entitlements to practise
As the practising arrangements have developed over the last ten years the number of categories of barristers has increased, with each category having a different or limited entitlement to practise. This creates confusion and uncertainty, both for the profession and for members of the public.
The BSB has therefore taken the creation of an authorisation to practise regime as an opportunity to try to regularise the position. To do so, the following is proposed:
Barristers who are not entitled to practise may not hold themselves out as barristers if they supply legal services. This rule will remain but will be strengthened and clarified so as to protect the interests of the public who deal with them without imposing disproportionate restrictions on the barristers concerned:
These measures are intended to provide greater certainty for members of the public about what their barrister can and cannot do.
The proposed change in the regulatory approach to dealing with barristers without full entitlements to practise will require transitional arrangements to ensure a smooth shift from the old regime to the new. The BSB will develop such arrangements once the outcomes of the consultation are known.
The Barristers’ Register
The Register, which the BSB introduced in October 2009, will provide the public face for the new authorisation to practise regime and will reflect individual barristers’ practising entitlements. It will also provide a useful medium for explaining and publicising the final authorisation regime to the profession and the public.
Challenges to be faced
Education and publicity will be critical to ensure that any new authorisation to practise regime is implemented successfully. The consultation paper has been sent to all chambers as well as all employed and non-practising barristers who are registered with the Bar Council. The BSB will also be contacting the main consumer bodies as well as a number of representative bodies for users of barristers’ services. Once the scheme is finalised a further round of education and publicity will be undertaken. Ideas on how that can best be achieved would be most welcome in responses to the consultation paper.
The BSB’s internal systems will need to be developed and enhanced to enable a more joined up approach to authorisation to practise. Accuracy of information will be vital as will a robust and dependable IT framework.
The 2007 Act establishes a new regime for the provision and regulation of legal services. The Act identifies six types of reserved legal activities: the exercise of a right of audience; the conduct of litigation; reserved instrument activities; probate activities; notarial activities; and the administration of oaths. Under the Act, the BSB is able to authorise barristers to undertake reserved legal activities, with the exception of notarial activities. In addition to regulating reserved legal activities, the BSB also regulates practising barristers who undertake non-reserved legal activities (including giving oral and written legal advice). It also regulates, to a limited extent, barristers who are not considered to be “practising” but none the less give legal advice.
Next steps
The deadline for consultation is 1 June 2010. A copy of the paper “Development of authorisation to practise arrangements – Consultation Paper” can be found in the consultation section of the BSB website at www.barstandardsboard.org.uk. The proposed changes to the practising arrangements for barristers will impact to varying degrees on the large majority of the Bar. The BSB is therefore keen to secure a wide range of responses to the proposals set out in this paper. We would be interested to know if our proposals are expected to have an adverse impact on any particular sector of clients or barristers. It is proposed that the new authorisation to practise regime will be introduced towards the end of 2011 so that it is in place for renewals at the start of 2012.
Charles Hollander QC and Sarah Brown are Chair and Vice-chair of the BSB’s Standards Committee respectively as well as members of the Board itself. They are joint Chairs of the BSB’s review of the Bar’s Code of Conduct.
The BSB has recently published a consultation paper on its proposals for revisions to barristers’ practising arrangements. Charles Hollander QC and Sarah Brown outline the key themes and explore the challenges ahead.
The Legal Services Act 2007 (“the Act”) introduces into the regulatory arena the principle of authorisation to practise. In terms of the Bar, this requires new procedures which build upon and extend the current practising certificate regime. The Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) has recently issued a consultation paper on its proposals for authorisation to practise arrangements.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt
