*/
The keynote address was given by the Rt Hon Sir Ernest Ryder, Senior President of Tribunals.
He spoke eloquently about the theme of this year’s conference – innovation and opportunity – as the life blood of a liberal profession. He took the audience back to 1873, when Levi Strauss patented his copper riveted overalls, Girton College opened as the first women-only college in Cambridge, Gladstone was prime minister, and the first of the Judicature Acts was passed to reform the judiciary and courts.
He said that just as in 1873, when focus was given to the issues of innovation, diversity and access to justice, there are interesting parallels today. While there were problems then, as now, there was a focus on strengthening the rule of law. The next six years will mark out the most ambitious period of change since the Judicature Acts of the 1870s; the court and tribunal reform programme that was announced in September is a £1bn investment project, the most ambitious court and tribunal modernisation programme in the world.
This year’s conference was a response to the realities of our age. ‘Austerity’ is not the driver of reform, but forces us to face up to the system’s limitations and be clear about what is necessary to prevent decline. It was important to avoid: lengthy delays that are inimical to justice and to welfare; processes and language that are unintelligible to all but the specialist user; and a system that is at times so costly that the only solution so far has been to impair access to justice by removing legal representation.
Sir Ernest said his intention is to reform process to make it clear and fit for the 21st century: an environment where paper-based processes are to digital processes and cloud-based systems what the horse-drawn carriage is to space travel. New process will inevitably lead to new rules and practices which need to be designed before we digitise them. It will be important to make those processes as intelligible to the user as possible.
In tribunals, online documents will be the norm, and criminal courts are already making use of tablets and screens. While there will be some who have neither the ability, nor the will, to take part in a digital dispute resolution system, the challenge is to design a new process which strengthens rather than dilutes the rule of law and which enhances the citizen’s access to justice. In the finest traditions of the Bar where innovation is second nature because it is fundamental to the practice of the common law, you will find and develop your own opportunities to provide digital access, both to advice but also to representation before online courts and tribunals.
He concluded by saying that while a digital world may be more effective and efficient (even more accessible, proportionate, swifter and more intelligible), it does not provide a substitute for the sophisticated skills of the advocate and the litigator. Reminding the audience that we are on the cusp of major reform to try and improve the rule of law by making it more accessible to the public, he asked the profession for its contribution.
Contributor Melissa Coutinho
Melissa Coutinho is a lawyer for the Government Legal Service An accredited arbitrator, qualified PPM practitioner and a magistrate, she also writes and lectures on medical products and their regulation.
He spoke eloquently about the theme of this year’s conference – innovation and opportunity – as the life blood of a liberal profession. He took the audience back to 1873, when Levi Strauss patented his copper riveted overalls, Girton College opened as the first women-only college in Cambridge, Gladstone was prime minister, and the first of the Judicature Acts was passed to reform the judiciary and courts.
He said that just as in 1873, when focus was given to the issues of innovation, diversity and access to justice, there are interesting parallels today. While there were problems then, as now, there was a focus on strengthening the rule of law. The next six years will mark out the most ambitious period of change since the Judicature Acts of the 1870s; the court and tribunal reform programme that was announced in September is a £1bn investment project, the most ambitious court and tribunal modernisation programme in the world.
This year’s conference was a response to the realities of our age. ‘Austerity’ is not the driver of reform, but forces us to face up to the system’s limitations and be clear about what is necessary to prevent decline. It was important to avoid: lengthy delays that are inimical to justice and to welfare; processes and language that are unintelligible to all but the specialist user; and a system that is at times so costly that the only solution so far has been to impair access to justice by removing legal representation.
Sir Ernest said his intention is to reform process to make it clear and fit for the 21st century: an environment where paper-based processes are to digital processes and cloud-based systems what the horse-drawn carriage is to space travel. New process will inevitably lead to new rules and practices which need to be designed before we digitise them. It will be important to make those processes as intelligible to the user as possible.
In tribunals, online documents will be the norm, and criminal courts are already making use of tablets and screens. While there will be some who have neither the ability, nor the will, to take part in a digital dispute resolution system, the challenge is to design a new process which strengthens rather than dilutes the rule of law and which enhances the citizen’s access to justice. In the finest traditions of the Bar where innovation is second nature because it is fundamental to the practice of the common law, you will find and develop your own opportunities to provide digital access, both to advice but also to representation before online courts and tribunals.
He concluded by saying that while a digital world may be more effective and efficient (even more accessible, proportionate, swifter and more intelligible), it does not provide a substitute for the sophisticated skills of the advocate and the litigator. Reminding the audience that we are on the cusp of major reform to try and improve the rule of law by making it more accessible to the public, he asked the profession for its contribution.
Contributor Melissa Coutinho
The keynote address was given by the Rt Hon Sir Ernest Ryder, Senior President of Tribunals.
The Bar Council continues to call for investment for the justice system and represent the interests of our profession both at home and abroad
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
The Amazonian artist’s first international solo exhibition is wholly relevant to current issues in social and environmental justice, says Stephen Cragg KC
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
It’s been five years since the groundbreaking QC competition in which six Black women barristers, including the 2025 Chair of the Bar, took silk. Yet today, the number of Black KCs remains ‘critically low’. Desirée Artesi talks to Baroness Scotland KC, Allison Munroe KC and Melanie Simpson KC about the critical success factors, barriers and ideas for embedding change
In the final part of a series celebrating the Bar Pro Bono Award winners, Ramby de Mello and Doughty Street Chambers share the stories behind their awards
