Public Funding

Article Default Image

A Step Too Far

Nick Green QC explains why the Bar Council is preparing to commence judicial review proceedings against the government 

Throughout January and early February I visited a number of cities in England and Wales (Cardiff, Winchester, Leeds, York, Birmingham and Manchester) and spoke to nearly 1,000 members of the Bar at the road shows. I have also visited over 30 sets of chambers and had conversations with numerous clerks and practice managers. The process is ongoing and I am planning further visits to chambers over the next few months. I am very grateful for the warm welcome that I have received. The exercise has been extraordinarily informative in enabling me to obtain a more precise and educated view of the day-to-day problems of the Bar. 

28 February 2010
Article Default Image

Prioritising legal aid

The Ministry of Justice has announced plans to re-focus legal aid away from low value damages claims against public bodies or “hopeless” judicial reviews. 

Before legal aid is granted in divorce and child contact disputes, the LSC will contact opponents to check applicants’ eligibility. Access to civil legal aid for non-residents will be restricted. Legal aid minister, Lord Bach said the changes would be introduced in April 2010. A consultation, “Legal Aid: Refocusing on Priority Cases”, took place last year. 

28 February 2010
Article Default Image

Reaction to Jackson

How have practitioners responded to the Final Report? Counsel rounds up some of the comments made on the NLJ Jackson webcast 

  

David Greene 

NLJ Consultant Editor & head of the litigation & dispute resolution team at Edwin Coe LLP. NLJ Jackson webcast participant 

“A lot of solicitors get their business from referral fees, agencies and management companies. If they didn’t get that business you would probably find that they would have to go out and advertise and spend the money in that way, so I don’t think it is a straight game in terms of referral fees. 

28 February 2010
Article Default Image

Disciplinary tribunals could struggle without extra funds

Extra funding for legal disciplinary proceedings may have to be found to cope with the fallout from the economic crisis, the Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger has warned. 

In a speech to the Disciplinary Conference in February, Lord Neuberger spelled out the regulatory challenges facing the profession. He warned that unreasonable delays in professional disciplinary proceedings penalised innocent professionals and undermined public confidence. Emphasising the need for effective case management, he said tribunals should abide by time limits and determine individual cases “as quickly as is consistent with the proper preparation of the case”. “Preparation, proper decision-making and judgment are of central importance here,” he said. “They will become all the more important if, as some anticipate, disciplinary investigations and proceedings increase as a consequence of the current difficult financial times. 

28 February 2010
Article Default Image

Stability for the publicly funded Bar, modernisation for all barristers - 2010 inaugural speech

SECURING stability for the publicly funded Bar and the need for all barristers to modernise in the fast-moving legal landscape have been set at the heart of the agenda for 2010 by incoming Bar Council Chairman, Nicholas Green QC. 

The leading regulatory and commercial lawyer, who practises at Brick Court Chambers, told a Bar Council meeting in London that the pressures on barristers doing publicly funded work were ‘potentially devastating’. He said: 

‘Cuts in legal aid pay, and competition for prosecution and defence work meant that pupillages to train young barristers were drying up in many parts of the country. Experienced barristers were often now ‘sitting idle’. Young, female and black and minority ethnic (BME) members of the Bar were being hit hardest. 

The Bar has made great strides in recent years to improve diversity and equality in the profession. These very positive steps are jeopardised by recent Government cuts, which do nothing to make the profession a more attractive place to come for a student saddled with a substantial debt as he or she leaves education and training,’ 

He condemned recent cuts in family and criminal legal aid, contrasting Ministerial and civil servants’ pay increases of 1% with reductions of 18% in legal aid pay. 

In the profession’s strongest warning yet over the legal aid crisis, Nicholas Green QC said: 

‘When members of the Bar see civil servants and Ministers taking an 18% pay cut, then we shall be silent. Until then we shall challenge unfair and irrational pay cuts with the utmost vigour.’ As rates declined, the risk was that there would be insufficient advocates prepared to take on the cases. 

Emphasising that he sought a settlement with the Crown Prosecution Service over its rising use of in-house counsel, Mr Green said that in the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, Parliament had expressly envisaged separation between the charging authority and the person conducting the trial. 

He warned: 

‘Parliament has never sanctioned the creation of a nationalised prosecution advocacy service. The creation of such a body has profound implications. Advocates will spend an entire career in a prosecutorial organisation and they might over time become “prosecution-minded”’ It was no coincidence that recent Directors of Public Prosecutions had made their names as leading defence advocates. Mr Green told the meeting, ‘Public and Parliament should debate the issue ‘before mission creep becomes mission accomplished’. 

Despite his concerns, he emphasised that his goal was to unify the profession, whether employed or in private practice: 

‘There is far more that binds us than parts us. We share a single set of values and traditions and an agreement will help us to heal the rift.’
Turning to moves to liberalise the rules governing the Bar’s provision of legal services, Nicholas Green QC said that these were changes that could not be ignored. 

He said: 

‘We do not have available to us the luxury of Canute-like opposition’ Moves by the Bar Standards Board to permit partnerships between barristers and other new business structures were to be welcomed. A menu of options was emerging, including procurement companies that would enable chambers to bid for more contracts. 

‘Over the next 12 months the Bar must begin to examine its methods of working. New choices on the menu will not appeal to all. But for some they may be critical.’ 

Looking ahead to Lord Justice Jackson’s forthcoming report on costs, Mr Green said that there were important opportunities, beyond Conditional Fee Agreements (CFAs), to open up access to the civil courts. These included the mooted Contingent Legal Aid Funds, which could be resourced by a court award of costs on top of damages rather than from the claimant’s damages themselves. 

He continued: 

‘In future, all barristers would need to define themselves by what they do. We are still predominantly advocacy specialists. We are specialist advisors. We are still essentially a referral service. The Bar has always represented a pool of very high quality specialist advice. We have a strong ethos as a profession that our work is in the public interest. The cab rank rule and the fundamental acknowledgement of our duty to the Court are still very important. The profession has a stellar record of pro bono work.’ 

He foresaw in future, the Bar might consider opening its doors to all specialist advocates, including solicitor advocates. Nicholas Green QC said he would be introducing measures to improve the internal operations of the Bar Council and its secretariat, inparticular to improve communication with profession. A panel of experienced juniors would be drafted in to assist with the Bar’s representations to Government and more widely. 

31 January 2010
Article Default Image

Forward Thinking

In his inaugural column Nick Green QC considers how the Bar should adapt and evolve 

As I look ahead into 2010 two main themes are likely to characterise the work of the Bar Council. These are the need to reintroduce stability in the publicly funded Bar and the need to address modernisation of the Bar. 

31 December 2009
Article Default Image

Nick Newman

Name: Nick Newman
Position: Senior Clerk
Chambers:  Cloth Fair Chambers 

31 December 2009
Article Default Image

Deal over complex terror and murder trials undermined by Government’s eleventh hour change in proposals

A deal to ensure proper funding for representation in the most complex criminal trials has today been threatened by a last-minute change of heart by the Government, the Bar said. The Bar Council and the Criminal Bar Association have reacted angrily to a new Legal Services Commission consultation paper on pay for so-called Very High Cost Cases – VHCCs – which include some of the most sensitive terror and murder trials before the courts. 

Bar representatives have been working with MoJ officials for nearly two years on a flexible pay scheme for senior advocates that would match the pay in each case to its particular circumstances. However, it emerged late in talks last month that the Government wanted to introduce a new, costcutting option for pay in these cases, involving an extension of the existing, fixed-fee scheme for shorter cases to include much longer cases lasting up to 60 days. The consultation paper of 2 December 2009 confirmed the eleventh-hour change. 

31 December 2009
Article Default Image

Friends in law

Chambers are being encouraged to contribute to pro bono work under the “Friends in Law” scheme launched by the Bar Pro Bono Unit and the Free Representation Unit. Scheme members can highlight their pro bono work on stationery and websites. 

31 December 2009
Article Default Image

Pro bono round up

Lord Goldsmith QC has expressed concern that budgets for pro bono and voluntary advice sector budgets are falling just as the recession is increasing demand. 

Addressing the National Pro Bono Conference, in London in November, he emphasised the need for lawyers to seek pro bono costs
orders, pointing out that they produced a “double win” for pro bono clients by generating new funds to support other pro bono work in the future. Lawyers needed to be “creative” to fi nd other means of funding, such as unclaimed client accounts. “This sector is stretched to capacity, swamped by an ever increasing demand and an ever decreasing budget,” he said. 

30 November 2009
Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results
virtual magazine View virtual issue

Chair’s Column

Feature image

Seeking a bright future for the Bar

Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession

Job of the Week

Sponsored

Most Viewed

Partner Logo

Latest Cases