*/
Town and country planning – Development. The claimant applied to quash the decision of the inspector appointed by the first defendant Secretary of State to grant a certificate of lawful use. The Planning Court, in dismissing the application, held that a proper interpretation of Class F of Pt 3 of Sch 2 to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995, SI 1995/418, permitted a change from a single planning unit to up to three planning units. Accordingly, the inspector had applied the law correctly in concluding that functional and physical separation had been required by the clear words of the Order.
Town and country planning – Development. The claimant applied to quash the decision of the inspector appointed by the first defendant Secretary of State to grant a certificate of lawful use. The Planning Court, in dismissing the application, held that a proper interpretation of Class F of Pt 3 of Sch 2 to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995, SI 1995/418, permitted a change from a single planning unit to up to three planning units. Accordingly, the inspector had applied the law correctly in concluding that functional and physical separation had been required by the clear words of the Order.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
