*/
Judicial review – Act of Scottish Parliament – Human rights – Data protection. Court of Session: Refusing a reclaiming motion in judicial review proceedings challenging the lawfulness of provisions in the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014, the court held: (1) that the Lord Ordinary applied the correct test as regards the standing of the first to fourth petitioners, although it disagreed with his conclusion that they lacked sufficient interest to pursue the alleged contraventions of EU law or breaches of fundamental rights; (2) that the named person service provisions in Pt 4 of the Act were not incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and hence beyond the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament; and (3) the challenges to the information sharing and disclosure provisions in the Act must be rejected.
Judicial review – Act of Scottish Parliament – Human rights – Data protection. Court of Session: Refusing a reclaiming motion in judicial review proceedings challenging the lawfulness of provisions in the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014, the court held: (1) that the Lord Ordinary applied the correct test as regards the standing of the first to fourth petitioners, although it disagreed with his conclusion that they lacked sufficient interest to pursue the alleged contraventions of EU law or breaches of fundamental rights; (2) that the named person service provisions in Pt 4 of the Act were not incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and hence beyond the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament; and (3) the challenges to the information sharing and disclosure provisions in the Act must be rejected.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
Responding to criticism on the narrow profile of government-instructed counsel, Mel Nebhrajani CB describes the system-wide change at GLD to drive fairer distribution of work and broader development of talent
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
