*/
Bankruptcy and Insolvency – Bankruptcy. The first defendant owed a debt to the second defendant local authority. By a consent order, a judge set aside a bankruptcy order made against the first defendant on the basis that security had been offered by way of a charge on his home. The applicant trustee in bankruptcy applied for an order that the consent order should be rescinded, pursuant to s 375 of the Insolvency Act 1986, relying on alleged debts owed to unsecured creditors, which had not been brought to the court's attention. A district judge ruled that he had no jurisdiction to order rescission of an order made by the High Court and the matter was transferred to the Chancery Division. That court, dismissing the application, held that, applying Appleyard v Wewelwala[2013] 1 All ER 1383, s 375(1) of the Act did not empower review of an order made by a judge of the High Court on appeal under s 375(2) of the Act. In so far as other unsecured creditors might be affected by the provision of the security to a petitioner, it was neither necessary nor appropriate for their interests to be addressed in the context of the issue of whether, where security was offered and rejected, a bankruptcy order should be made or refused.
Bankruptcy and Insolvency – Bankruptcy. The first defendant owed a debt to the second defendant local authority. By a consent order, a judge set aside a bankruptcy order made against the first defendant on the basis that security had been offered by way of a charge on his home. The applicant trustee in bankruptcy applied for an order that the consent order should be rescinded, pursuant to s 375 of the Insolvency Act 1986, relying on alleged debts owed to unsecured creditors, which had not been brought to the court's attention. A district judge ruled that he had no jurisdiction to order rescission of an order made by the High Court and the matter was transferred to the Chancery Division. That court, dismissing the application, held that, applying Appleyard v Wewelwala[2013] 1 All ER 1383, s 375(1) of the Act did not empower review of an order made by a judge of the High Court on appeal under s 375(2) of the Act. In so far as other unsecured creditors might be affected by the provision of the security to a petitioner, it was neither necessary nor appropriate for their interests to be addressed in the context of the issue of whether, where security was offered and rejected, a bankruptcy order should be made or refused.
Efforts continue on gender equality, support for the Bar, meaningful reform for the sector and advocating for the rule of law
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Leading drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Beatson Cancer Charity in Glasgow as part of its Giving Back campaign
Girls Human Rights Festival 2025: a global gathering for change
Exclusive Q&A with Henry Dannell
Patrick Green KC talks about the landmark Post Office Group litigation and his driving principles for life and practice. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
Desiree Artesi meets Malcolm Bishop KC, the Lord Chief Justice of Tonga, who talks about his new role in the South Pacific and reflects on his career
Sir Nicholas Mostyn, former High Court judge, on starting a hit podcast with fellow ‘Parkies’ after the shock of his diagnosis
Exclusive QA with Henry Dannell
Best books, top tracks, fabulous films, artistic influences and an essential for mid-trial stayovers: Counsel invites barristers to share their cultural influences and home comforts
