Company – Petition. The petitioner, C, presented a petition seeking an order that the first two respondents, B and G, purchase his one third shareholding in the third respondent company. The Companies Court held that, on the evidence, the first and second respondent directors of the company were subject to equitable constraints, and that none of the allegations made about C's conduct had justified his exclusion while leaving him locked into the company. Relief would be granted to C under s 996 of the Companies Act 2006.