R v Padda

Sentence – Confiscation order. The defendant had satisfied a confiscation order against him under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Over six years later, the judge imposed a further confiscation order. The defendant appealed. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, in dismissing the appeal, held that the judge had taken an unexceptional approach to the case and that the further confiscation order had been neither wrong nor manifestly excessive.

Category: