*/
Sentence – Sexual offences prevention order. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, in dismissing the claimant's appeal, held that the powers conferred under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 enabled a person who was subject to a Sexual Offences Prevention Order to be required to wear location monitoring device (a tag) when away from the premises at which he was residing or staying overnight.
Sentence – Sexual offences prevention order. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, in dismissing the claimant's appeal, held that the powers conferred under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 enabled a person who was subject to a Sexual Offences Prevention Order to be required to wear location monitoring device (a tag) when away from the premises at which he was residing or staying overnight.
The Bar Council continues to call for investment...
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at...
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s...
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private...
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at...
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Little has changed since Burns v Burns ....
Six months of court observation at the Old...
The Amazonian artist’s first international solo...
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum...
It’s been five years since the groundbreaking...
