*/
Prison – Prisoner. The claimant prisoner sought, by way of judicial review, to challenge the lawfulness of guidance issued by the defendant Parole Board (PB) to its panels on the test to be applied when considering the re-release after recall to custody of a prisoner who was serving a determinate sentence of imprisonment. Dismissing the claim, the Divisional Court held that when exercising its power under s 255C(4) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, the test that the PB should apply had been the statutory test of whether the PB was satisfied that it was not necessary for the protection of the public that the prisoner should remain in prison.
Prison – Prisoner. The claimant prisoner sought, by way of judicial review, to challenge the lawfulness of guidance issued by the defendant Parole Board (PB) to its panels on the test to be applied when considering the re-release after recall to custody of a prisoner who was serving a determinate sentence of imprisonment. Dismissing the claim, the Divisional Court held that when exercising its power under s 255C(4) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, the test that the PB should apply had been the statutory test of whether the PB was satisfied that it was not necessary for the protection of the public that the prisoner should remain in prison.
Efforts continue on gender equality, support for the Bar, meaningful reform for the sector and advocating for the rule of law
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Leading drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Beatson Cancer Charity in Glasgow as part of its Giving Back campaign
Girls Human Rights Festival 2025: a global gathering for change
Exclusive Q&A with Henry Dannell
